Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:48:19.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reviving the grand narrative: archaeology and long-term change: The Second David L. Clarke Memorial Lecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Andrew Sherratt
Andrew Sherratt*
Affiliation:
Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PH, Great Britain
Get access

Abstract

This contribution, in memory of the Cambridge archaeologist and cultural theorist, David Clarke (1938–76), investigates the possibility of a coherent description of long-term change on an archaeological time scale. It rejects an earlier (‘processualist’) synthesis based on ecology; but, rather than retreat into an introverted and fragmented post-modernism, it asserts the continuing value of a ‘grand narrative’. It identifies the problems of the neo-evolutionary conception prevalent in the 1960s and early 1970s, and in particular a division into stages, and emphasis on autonomous development, and the priority given to production. In contrast, this presentation emphasises the importance of social interaction and cultural encounter. This interactionist approach is exemplified in new descriptions of the ‘Neolithic’, ‘Urban’, and ‘Industrial’ Revolutions, and discussed as a means of conceptualising some general properties of long-term change.

Der vorliegende Beitrag, der dem Gedenken an den Cambridger Archäologen und Theoretiker David Clarke (1938–76) gewidmet ist, untersuch die Möglichkeit, Langzeitwandel innerhalb eines archäologischen Zeitrahmens kohärent zu beschreiben. Die früher vorgeschlagene ‘prozessualistische’ Synthese, die auf der Äkologie baseirte, wird dabei abgelehnt. Statt aber den Rückzug in einen introvertierten und in sich zerrissenen Postmodernismus anzutreten, wird hier der Wert eines übergreifenden Erklärungmodells bekräftigt. Der Beitrag arbeitet die Problmeme des neoevolutionären Konzeptes der 1960er und 70er Jahre heraus, insbesondere die Unterteilung in Entwicklungsstufen, die einsetige Betonung eigenständiger Entwicklung und die Priorität, die dem Produktionsbereich zugemessen wurde. Im Gegensatz dazu stellt der vorliegende Beitrag die Bedeutung von sozialer Interaktion und Kulturkontakt heraus. Dieser ‘interaktionistische’ Ansatz wird beispielhaft in neuen Beschreibungen der neolithischen, der städtischen und der industriellen Revolution vorgeführt, und seine Anwendung zum Verständnis einiger allgemeiner Eigenschaften von Langzeitwandel wird erörtert.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of European Archaeology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, J., 1989. Before European Hegemony: the world system A.D. 1250–1350. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, R. McC., 1974. Anthropological perspectives on ancient trade. Current Anthropology 15 (3), 239–58.Google Scholar
Asch, D. L. and Asch, N. E., 1985. Prehistoric plant cultivation in west-central Illinois. In Ford, R. I. (ed.), Prehistoric Food Production in North America: 149–204. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J., 1981. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis: Telos Press. (Wooden translation of 1972 French original.)Google Scholar
Bender, Barbara, 1978. Hunter-gatherer to farmer: a social perspective. World Archaeology 10: 204–222.Google Scholar
Bender, Barbara, 1990. The dynamics of nonhierarchical societies. In Upham, S. (ed.), The Evolution of Political Systems: 247–263. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boserup, E., 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Brewer, J. and Porter, R. (eds), 1993. Consumption and the World of Goods. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cannadine, David, 1984. The present and the past in the English industrial revolution 1880–1980. Past and Present 103: 131–172.Google Scholar
Chorley, R. and Haggett, P., 1969. Network Analysis in Geography. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Clarke, David L., 1972. Models and paradigms in contemporary archaeology. In Clarke, D. L. (ed.) Models in Archaeology: 1–60. London: Methuen (reprinted in Clarke 1979:21–82).Google Scholar
Clarke, David L., 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 47: 6–18 (reprinted in Clarke 1979:83–104).Google Scholar
Clarke, David L., 1979 (opus posthumus). Analytical Archaeologist: collected papers of David L. Clarke, edited by his colleagues. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, David L., 1979a. The economic context of trade and industry in barbarian Europe till Roman Times. In Clarke 1979:263–332.Google Scholar
Clarke, David L., 1979b. Towns in the development of early civilisation. In Clarke 1979:435–444.Google Scholar
Dartty, William 1992. British industry and the West Indies Plantations. In Inikori, J. E. and Engerman, S. L. (eds), The Atlantic Slave Trade: effects on economies, societies and peoples in Africa, the Americas and Europe: 247–282. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, 1966. Purity and Danger: an analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1978. The Civilizing Process, vol. 1, The History of Manners. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1982. The Civilizing Process, vol. 2, State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellen, R. F., 1988. Fetishism. Man (n.s.) 23:213–235.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent (ed.), 1976. The Early Mesoamerican Village. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Paul and Saller, R. P., 1987. The Roman Empire: economy, society, culture. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Kevin, 1986. The Archaeology of the Roman Economy. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Gudeman, S., 1986. Economics as Culture: models and metaphors of livelihood. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hart, K., 1982. On commoditization. In Goody, E. N. (ed.), Prom Craft to Industry: the ethnography of proto-industrial cloth production: 38–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, 1990. The Domestication of Europe, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hornborg, A., 1992. Machine fetishism, value and the image of unlimited good: towards athermodynamics of imperialism. Man (n.s.) 27:1–18.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jane, 1969. The Economy of Cities. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. W. and Earle, Timothy, 1987. The Evolution of Human Societies: from foraging group to agrarian state. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McKendrick, N., Brewer, J., and Plumb, J. H., 1982. The Birth of a Consumer Society: the commercialisation of eighteenth-century England. London: Europa.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E. and Fisher, M. M. J., 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: an experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Medawar, P., 1969. Herbert Spencer and the law of general evolution. In Medawar, P., The Art of the Soluble: creativity and originality in science: 45–67. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lotka, Alfred, 1924. Elements of Physical Biology. Reprinted 1956 as Elements of Mathematical Biology. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Moran, P. and Hides, D. S., 1990. Writing, authority and the determination of a subject. In Bapty, Ian and Yates, Timothy (eds), Archaeology after Structuralism: 205–221. London: Routledge. [N.B. this poor article is listed amongst so many good ones solely for the purposes of criticism.]Google Scholar
Paulsen, Allison C., 1974. The thorny oyster and the voice of God: Spondylus and Strombus in Andean prehistory. American Antiquity 39 (4): 597–607.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. Colin, 1994. Preface. In Mathers, C. and Stoddart, Simon (eds), Development and Decline in the Mediterranean Bronze Age: 5–11. Sheffield: J. R. Collis Publications.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W., 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: a non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall, 1988. Cosmologies of capitalism: the trans-Pacific sector of ‘the World System’. Proceedings of the British Academy 74: 1–51.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T. and Price, B. J., 1968. Mesoamerica: the evolution of a civilization. New York Random House.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jane, 1977. Was there a pre-capitalist world system?' Peasant Studies 6 (1): 20–9.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., 1985. Anthropology and psychology: towards an epidemiology of representations. Man (n. s.) 20:73–89.Google Scholar
Taussig, M., 1980. The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. and Goodfield, J., 1965. The Discovery of Time. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel, 1974. The Modern World-System: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the world-economy in the 16th century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Mortimer, 1955. Rome Beyond the Imperial Frontiers. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
White, Leslie A., 1959. The Evolution of Culture: the development of civilization to the fall of Rome. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R., 1982. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A., 1969. Population and History. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar