We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Pluralism and divisions in European archaeology - Whither Archaeology? Papers in honour of Evžen Neustupný edited by Martin Kuna and Natalie Venclova (Prague: Institute of Archaeology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 1995, 312 pp., pbk, ISBN 80-901934-0-4, £15.00).
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
27 January 2017
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Coarelli, Filippo, 1994. L'archéologie classique dans la culture européenne d'aujourd'hui. Revue Archéologique2: 294–302.Google Scholar
Dyson, Stephen L., 1989. The role of ideology and institutions in shaping classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In Christenson, A. L. (ed.), Archaeology's Past, the Historiography of Archaeology: 127–138. Carbondale: Southern Illinois State Universty Press.Google Scholar
Funari, Pedro Paulo A., 1995, Mixed features of archaeological theory in Brazil. In Ucko, Peter J. (ed.), Theory in Archaeology, a World Perspective: 236–250. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Anna C.1991. Determinismo ecologico na interpretacao do desenvolvimento social indigena. In Neves, Walter A. (ed.), Origens, adaptacoes e diversidade biologica do homem nativo da Amazonia: 103–41. Belem: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi.Google Scholar