Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:06:00.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

House Contents in Pompeii: data collection and interpretative procedures for a reappraisal of Roman domestic life and site formation processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Penelope M. Allison
Penelope M. Allison*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, Classics and Ancient History, University of Sydney, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Despite the extensive household assemblages excavated in Pompeii, material culture studies of this site have been dominated by epigraphical, architectural, and art-historical studies. A database of the excavated contents of 30 Pompeian houses (863 rooms and 6,300 artefacts) was compiled in order to rectify this situation. It was used to investigate room use and the living conditions in Pompeii between AD 62 and AD 79, through these assemblages.

Because of the nature of the excavation records, much effort was required to process the available data in a meaningful and useful manner. Also the state of prior research in this area required the deconstruction of past, predominantly text-based, assumptions about these specific issues. However, using methods and analytical processes appropriate to such an investigation of a previously excavated site, this study was able to present a new perspective on living conditions in the last decades in Pompeii, in particular, and on Roman domestic life and site formation processes, more generally.

Die Häuser von Pompeii enthielten zahlreiche Haushaltsgegenstände und Apparaturen, die an der Stelle ihres letzten Gebrauchs freigelegt worden sind. Auf einer Datenbasis von 863 Räumen und 6.300 Gegenständen wurden Raumnutzung und Lebensverhältnisse im Pompeii der Jahre vor dem Ausbruch des Vesuvs im Jahre 79 n. Chr. untersucht. Es erforderte große Mühe, die vorhandenen Daten zu bearbeiten, nicht nur weil die frühen Ausgräber Entdeckungen von alltäglichen Material und dessen Fundorte nicht dokumentierten, sondern auch well unsere Annahmen so lange von klassischen Texten geprägt waren.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of European Archaeology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 145 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, Jean-Paul, 1989. L'edilizia privata: Pompei e suo agro. In Guidaboni, E. (ed.), I terramoti prima del Mille in Italia e nell'area mediterranea: 224–243. Bologna.Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., 1986. The Wall-paintings of the Casa della Caccia Antica in Pompeii. , University of Sydney (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International, 1991).Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., 1992a. Artefact assemblages: not the ‘Pompeii premise’. In Herring, Edward et al. (eds), Papers of the Fourth Conference in Italian Archaeology 3 no. 1: 49–56. London: Accordia Research Centre.Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., 1992b. The Distribution of Pompeian House Contents and its Significance. , !University of Sydney (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International, 1994).Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., 1993. How do we identify the use of space in Roman housing? In Moormann, Eric M. (ed.), Functional and Spatial Analysis of Wall Painting, Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Ancient Wall Painting: 1–8. Leiden: BABESCH Suppl.3.Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., 1994. Issues of data exchange and accessibility: Pompeii. In Johnson, Ian (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of the UISPP Commission IV Meeting (Data Management, Mathematical Methods and Computing in Archaeology): 35–41. Sydney: Archaeological Computing Laboratory, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., forthcoming 1. On-going seismic activity and its effects on living conditions in Pompeii in the last decades. In Fröhlich, Thomas and Jacobelli, Luciana (eds), La regione vesuviana dal 62 al 79 d.C: problemi archaeologici e sismologici. Munich: Biering-Brinkman.Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., forthcoming 2. Why do excavation reports have finds' catalogues? Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M., forthcoming 3. Artefact distribution and spatial function in Pompeian houses. In Rawson, Beryl and Weaver, Paul (eds), Roman Family III: Status, Sentiment and Space.Google Scholar
Allison, Penelope M. and Ling, Roger, forthcoming. The Insula del Menandro in Pompeii: The Finds.Google Scholar
Andreau, Jean, 1973. Histoire des séismes et histoire économique. Annales Économies Sociétés Civilisations 28 (1): 369–395.Google Scholar
Annecchino, Maria, 1977a. Suppellettile fittile da cucina di Pompei. In Carandini, Andrea et al., L'Instrumentum domesticum di Ercolano e Pompei nella prima éta imperiale: 105–120. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Annecchino, Maria, 1977b. Fritillus, un piccolo vaso di terracotta. Cronache Pompeiana 3: 198–213.Google Scholar
Ascher, Robert, 1961. Analogy in archaeological interpretation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17: 317–25.Google Scholar
Atkinson, T. D., Bosanquet, R. C., Edgar, C. C., Evans, A. J., Hogarth, D. G., Mackenzie, D., Smith, C., and Welch, F. B., 1904. Excavations at Phylakopi in Melos. London: MacMillan (Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Supplementary Paper 4).Google Scholar
Barbet, Alix and Allag, Claudine, 1972. Techniques de préparations des parois dans la peinture murale romaine. Mélanges de l'École français de Rome, Antiquité 84: 935–1069.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R., 1981. Behavioral archaeology and the ‘Pompeii premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research 37: 195–208.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1970. La maison kabyle ou le monde renversé. In Pouillon, Jean et Maranda, Pierre (eds), Échanges et Communications, Mélanges offerts à Claude Lévi-Strauss à l'occasion de son 60ème anniversaire. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1991. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bragantini, Irene, Vos, Mariette de, Badoni, Franca Parise, and Sampaolo, Valeria, 1980, 1983, and 1986. Pitture e pavimenti di Pompei: Repertorio delle fotografie de Gabinetto Fotografico Nazionale, vols 1–3. Rome: Ministero per i beni culturali e ambientali.Google Scholar
Carandini, Andrea, 1977. L'Instrumentum Domesticum di Ercolano e Pompei nella prima éta imperiale. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Cerulu Irelli, Giuseppina, 1975. Intorno al problema della rinascita di Pompei. In Andreae, Bernard and Kyrieleis, Helmut, Neue Forschungen in Pompeji: 291–298. Recklinghausen: Bongers.Google Scholar
Clarke, John R., 1991. The Houses of Roman Italy 100 BC – AD 250: Ritual, Space, and Decoration. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Conticello, Baldasarre, 1990. Riscoperire Pompei. In Conticello, Baldasarre et al., Rediscovering Pompeii: 2–25. Rome: L'Erma Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Crummy, Nina, 1983, The Roman Small Finds from Excavations in Colchester, 1971–9. London: Colchester Archaeological Trust and the Council for British Archaeology (Colchester Archaeological Reports 2).Google Scholar
Daremberg, Charles V. and Saglio, Edmond, 1875. Dictionnaire des Antiquités grecqués et romaines I. Paris: Libairie Hachette.Google Scholar
Davey, Norman and Ling, Roger, 1982. Wall-painting in Roman Britain. Gloucester Allan Sutton.Google Scholar
Daviau, P. M. Michèle, 1993. Houses and their Furnishings in Bronze Age Palestine: Domestic Activity Areas and Artefact Distribution in the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Della Corte, Matteo, 1919. Pompei – Continuazione degli scavi sulla via dell'Abbondanza. Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità series 5 vol. 16: 232–242.Google Scholar
Della Corte, Matteo, 1965. Case ed Abitanti di Pompei. 3rd edition. Naples: Fausto Fiorentino.Google Scholar
De Vos, Arnold and Vos, Mariette de, 1982. Pompei Ercolano Stabia. Rome and Bari: Guis. Laterza and Figli Spa.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Eugene J., 1982. Pompeian Domestic Sculpture: A Study of Five Pompeian Houses and their Contents. Rome: Georgio Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Dyson, Stephen L., 1989, The role of ideology and institutions in shaping classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In Christenson, Andrew L. (ed.), Tracing Archaeology's Past: the Historiography of Archaeology: 127–135. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois.Google Scholar
Dyson, Stephen L., 1993. From new to new age archaeology: archaeological theory and classical archaeology – a 1990s perspective. American Journal of Archaeology 97 (2): 195–206.Google Scholar
Elia, Olga, 1932. I cubiculi nelle case di Pompeii. Historia 4 (3): 394–421.Google Scholar
Evans, Edith M., 1984. The Atrium Complex in the Houses in Pompeii. , University of Birmingham (London: British Library Microfilms).Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I., 1985. Ancient History: evidence and models. London: Chatto and Winches.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Thomas and Jacobelu, Luciana (eds), forthcoming. La regione vesuviana dal 62 al 79 d.C.: problemi archaeologici e sismologici. München: Biering-Brinkman.Google Scholar
Jongman, Willem M., 1988. Economy and Society in Pompeii. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
La Torre, Gioacchino F., 1988. Gli impianti commerciali ed artigianali nel tessuto urbano di Pompei. In Pompei. L'informatica al servizio di una città: 75–102. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Ling, Roger, 1983. The Insula of the Menander at Pompeii: interim report. The Journal of Antiquaries 63: 33–57.Google Scholar
Lista, Marinella, 1986. Gli oggetti di uso quotidiano. In Borriello, Maria R. et al., Le Collezione del Museo Nazionale di Napoli (i mosaici, le pitture, gli oggetti di uso quotidiano, gli argento ecc.): 77–86. Rome: De Luca.Google Scholar
McKay, Alexander G., 1977. Houses, Villas and Palaces in the Roman World. Southampton: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Maiuri, Amedeo, 1927. Relazione sui lavori di scavo dal marzo 1924 al marzo 1926. Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità series 6 vol. 3: 1–83.Google Scholar
Maiuri, Amedeo, 1929. Pompei – Relazione sui lavori di scavo dall'aprile 1926 al dicembre 1927. Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità series 6 vol. 5: 354–438.Google Scholar
Maiuri, Amedeo, 1933. La Casa del Menandro e il suo Tesoro di Argenteria. Rome: La Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Maiuri, Amedeo, 1942. L'Ultima Fase Edilizia di Pompei. Rome: Istituto di studi romani.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, Hendrik, 1988. Elections, Magistrates and the Municipal Élite. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider. Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, Notiziario VI,26 (Sept.-Oct. 1989).Google Scholar
Nevett, Lisa, 1992. Variation in the Form and Use of Domestic Space in the Greek World in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods. , University of Cambridge 1992.Google Scholar
Nevett, Lisa, forthcoming. Greek households under Roman hegemony: the archaeological evidence. In Samson, Ross (ed), Theoretical Roman Archaeology: proceedings of the third conference. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Oliva, Maria n.d. Unpublished excavation notebooks of the Casa di Iulius Polybius, vols 1–9 VIII. Archivio Pompei.Google Scholar
Peters, W. J. Th., Moormann, E. M., Heres, T. L., Brunsting, H., and Wynia, S. L., 1993. La Casa di Marcus Lucretius Fronto a Pompei e le sue pitture, Scrinium V. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Amos, 1990. The Meaning of the Built Environment. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Ricci, Andreina, 1985. Settefinestre: Una villa schiavistica nell'Etruria romana, vol. 2, La Villa e i suoi reperti. Modena: Panini.Google Scholar
Roaf, Michael, 1989. Social organization and social activities at Tell Madhhur. In Hendrickson, Elizabeth F. and Thuesen, Ingolf (eds), Upon This Foundation: 91–146. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Anne, 1982. Absence of evidence: reply to Keryn Kefous. Archaeology in Oceania 17: 99.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., 1985. Is there a Pompeii premise? Journal of Anthropological Research 41: 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael E., 1992. Braudel's temporal rhythms and chronological theory in archaeology. In Knapp, Bernard E. (ed.), Archaeology, Annales and Ethnohistory: 23–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sogliano, A., 1905. Pompei - Relazione degli scavi fatti dal dicembre 1902 a tutto marzo 1905. Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità II: 245–257.Google Scholar
Spinazzola, Vittorio, 1953. Pompei alle luce degli Scavi Nuovi di Via dell'Abbondanza (anni 1910–1923), vols 1–3. Rome.Google Scholar
Stead, Ian M. and Rigby, Valery, 1986. Baldock: the Excavation of a Roman and pre-Roman Settlement, 1968–72. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies (Britannia monograph series 7).Google Scholar
Stenning, Derrick J., 1969. Household viability among pastoral Fidarti. In Goody, Jack (ed.), Developmental Cycles in Domestic Groups: 92–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology no. 1).Google Scholar
Strocka, Volker M., 1984. Casa di di Prinicipe di Napoli. Tübingen: Wasmuth (Häuser in Pompeji 1).Google Scholar
Taylor, Penny (ed.), 1988. After 200 Years: photographic essays of aboriginal and islander Australia today. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Torrence, Robin, Specht, Jim and Fullagar, Richard, 1990. Pompeiis in the Pacific. Australia Natural History 23 (6): 457–463.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew F., 1988. The social structure of a Roman house. Papers of the British School at Rome 56: 43–97.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew F., 1989. Patronage in Roman society: from republic to empire. In Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew F. (ed.), Patronage in Ancient Society: 63–87. London and New York Routledge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew F., 1990. The social spread of Roman luxury: sampling Pompeii and Herculaneum. Papers of the British School at Rome 58: 145–192.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew F., 1991. House and households: sampling Pompeii and Herculaneum. In Rawson, Beryl (ed.), Marriage, Divorce and Children in Ancient Rome: 191–227. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Will, Elizabeth L., 1979. Women in Pompeii. Archaeology 32 (5): 34–43.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard V.S., 1989. Doing Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology and Prehistory, Handling Large Data Sets with MV-Arch. Sydney: Richard Wright.Google Scholar
Zanker, Paul, 1993. Pompei: Società, immagini urbane e fórme dell'abitare. (Zambrini, Andrea, tr.) Turin: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar