Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T20:40:28.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was England Really Superior to France?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Rondo Cameron
Rondo Cameron
Affiliation:
William Rand Kenan University Professor at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , December 1986 , pp. 1031 - 1039
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Crouzet, François, De la supériorité de l' Angleterre sur la France: L'Économique er l' Imaginaire, XVIIe–XXe siècles. Préface de Pierre Chaunu. Collection “Pour l' Histoire.” (Paris, 1985), p. 596.Google Scholar

2 Tapié, Victor-L., ed., Les hommes d'etat célèbres, vol. 4, De la découverte de l' Amérique à la Révolution française (Paris, 1971), pp. 102–7.Google Scholar

3 Crouzet, De la supérioriré, p. 21.Google Scholar

4 Annales, E.S.C., 21 (Mars-Avril 1966), pp. 254–91; Hartwell, R. M., ed., The Causes of tile Industrial Revolution in England (London, 1967), pp. 139–74.Google Scholar

5 Crouzet, De la supériorité, p. 37.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., pp. 74–75.

7 Braudel, Fernand, Civilisation matérielle, économie ci capitalisme, XVe–XVIIIe siècle, vol. 3, Le temps du monde (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar

8 “The Sources of England's Wealth: Some French Views in the Eighteenth Century,” in Cottrell, P. L. and Aldcroft, D. H., eds., Shipping, Trade and Commerce: Essays in Memory of Ralph Davis (Leicester, 1981).Google Scholar

9 London, Methuen & Co.Google Scholar

10 Deuxième conférence iniernationale d'histoire économique. Aix-en-Provence, 1962 (Paris-Den Haag, 1965), pp. 589–642.Google Scholar

11 Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Why was British Growth So Slow during the Industrial Revolution?” this JOURNAL, 44 (09 1984), pp. 687–712.Google Scholar

12 “Towards an Export Economy: British Exports during the Industrial Revolution,” Explorations in Economic History, 17 (01 1980), pp. 48–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 “Cliométne et révolution industrielle,” Histoire, Économie, el Société (1983), pp. 607–24.Google Scholar

14 Crouzet, De la supériorité, p. 220.Google Scholar

15 Crouzet, François, ed., Les hommes d'état célèbres, vol. 5, De la Révolution Française à la première guerre mondiale (Paris, 1975), pp. 52–69.Google Scholar

16 “Les Conséquences économiques de la Révolution. A propos d'un inédit de Sir Francis d' Ivernois,” Annales hisroriques de la Révolution Française, 34 (1962), pp. 182–217 and 336–62.Google Scholar

17 Crouzet, De la supériorité, p. 296.Google Scholar

18 Kindleberger, C. P. and di Tella, Guido, eds., Economics in the Long View: Essays in Honour of W. W. Rostow (London, 1982), vol. 2, pp. 44–66.Google Scholar

19 Youngson, A. J., ed., Economic Development in the Long Run (London, 1972), pp. 98–125.Google Scholar

20 Crouzet, De la supériorité, p. 341.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., p. 54.

22 Annales E.S.C., 19 (Mars-Avril 1964), pp. 281–310.Google Scholar

23 Crouzet, De la supériorité, p. 562.Google Scholar

24 Trenard, Louis, ed., Charbon et sciences humaines. Actes du colloqué organisé par la Faculté des Leures de l' Université de Lille en mai 1963 (Paris-Den Haag, 1966), pp. 173–205.Google Scholar

25 Crouzet, De la supériorité, p. 405.Google Scholar

26 Revue Historique, 254 (Juillet-Septembre 1975), pp. 105–34.Google Scholar

27 Bédarida, François, et al. , eds., De Guillaume le Conquérant au Marché Commun. Dix siècles de l'histoire franco-britannique (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar

28 Crouzet, De la supériorité, p. 454.Google Scholar

29 Harley, C. Knick, “British Industrialization before 1841: Evidence of Slower Growth during the Industrial Revolution,” this JOURNAL, 42 (06 1982), pp. 267–89;Google ScholarCrafts, N. F. R., “British Economic Growth, 1700–1831: A Review of the Evidence,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 36 (05 1983), pp. 177–99;CrossRefGoogle ScholarWilliamson, Jeffrey G., “Why was British Growth So Slow?”; Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald, eds., The Economic History of Britain since 1700, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar See also Cameron, Rondo, “The Industrial Revolution: A Misnomer,” in Schneider, Jürgen, ed., Wirtschafskräfte und Wirtschaftswege: Festschrift für Hermann Kellenbenz (Stuttgart, 1981), vol. 5, pp. 367–76;Google Scholar and “A New View of European Industrialization,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 38 (Feb. 1985), pp. 1–23. The latter article, which appeared a few months before he began reading proofs on his book, is primarily concerned with one of his central theses.Google Scholar