Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:27:55.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Steers Afloat: The North Atlantic Meat Trade, Liner Predominance, and Freight Rates, 1870–1913

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

C. KNICK HARLEY
C. KNICK HARLEY*
Affiliation:
Professor of Economic History, Department of Economics and St. Antony's College, University of Oxford, Manor Road Building, Oxford OX1 3UQ, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meat transformed North Atlantic shipping, leading to dominance of liners and changed the economics of freight rates. Management coordination of meat shipment led to concentration in shipping. Only liner companies could provide specialized ships with the regularity needed and they dominated North Atlantic shipping. The cargo capacity of cattle ships, beyond that used for animals, lowered freight rates on grain below levels that would otherwise have prevailed. The berth rate on wheat from New York to Liverpool was most affected. Consequently, this readily available freight rate can be potentially misleading as an indicator of ocean shipping developments.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 1028 - 1058
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aduddell, Robert M., & Cain, Louis P.. “Location and Collusion in the Meat Packing Industry.” In Business Enterprise and Economic Change: Essays in Honor of Harold F. Williamson, edited by Cain, Louis P. and Uselding, Paul J., pp. 85–117. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Aduddell, Robert M., & Cain, Louis P.. “Public Policy Toward the ‘Greatest Trust in the World.’” Business History Review 55, no. 2 (1981): 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Frank. “Ocean Freights and the Conditions Affecting Them.” Washington, DC: GPO, 1907.Google Scholar
Annual Statement of Trade, Parliamentary Papers, various dates.Google Scholar
Annual Statistical Abstract of the United States.Google Scholar
Annual Statistical Report, New York Produce Exchange, 1876–1913.Google Scholar
Bai, Jushan.“Estimation of a Change Point in Multiple Regression Models” The Review of Economics and Statistics 79, no. 4 (1997): 551–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Parliamentary Papers. Reports of Agents of the Canadian Dominion Department of Agriculture in Britain. Various dates.Google Scholar
Carosso, Vincent P.The Morgans: Private International Bankers, 1854–1913. London and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr.The Visible H and: The Managerial revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Cunard Line Records, University of Liverpool Library.Google Scholar
Epley, Richard J. “Aging Beef.” University of Minnesota Extension Service, Bulletin FS-05968, 1992 [www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/nutrition/DJ5968.html].Google Scholar
Fairplay, various dates.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H.National Income, Expenditure, and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Barry K., Grennes, Thomas J., & Craig, Lee A.. “Mechanical Refrigeration and the Integration of Perishable Commodity Markets.” Explorations in Economic History 39, no. 2 (2002): 154–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Bruce E.“The New Econometrics of Structural Change: Dating Breaks in U.S. Labor Productivity” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, no. 4 (2001): 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “Western Settlement and the Price of Wheat.” This Journal 38, no. 4 (1978): 865–78.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “Transportation, the World Wheat Trade, and Kuznets Cycle” Explorations in Economic History 17, no. 3 (1980): 218–50.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “Coal Exports and British Shipping, 1850–1913” Explorations in Economic History 26, no. 3 (1989): 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “North Atlantic Shipping in the Late Nineteenth Century: Freight Rates and the Interrelationship of Cargoes.” In Shipping and Trade, 1750–1950: Essays in International Maritimes Economic History, edited by Fischer, Lewis R. and Nordvik, Helge W., 147–71. Pontefract, U.K.: Lofthouse Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “The World Food Economy and Pre-World War I Argentina.” In Britain in the World Economy: Essays in Honour of Alec Ford, edited by Broadberry, S. and Crafts, N., 244–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. The Integration of the World Economy, 1850–1914. Cheltenham, U.K.: Elgar Reference Collection, 1996.Google Scholar
Heffer, Jean. Le Port de New York et le Commerce Exterieur Americain, 1860–1900. Doctorat d'Etat, Université de Paris I, 1984.Google Scholar
Hooker, R. H.“The Meat Supply of the United Kingdom” The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 72, no. 2 (1909): 304–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasny, N.Competition among Grains. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Johnson, Emory R., & Huebner, Grover G.. Principals of Ocean Transportation. New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1918.Google Scholar
Malenbaum, Wilfred.The World Wheat Economy, 1885–1939. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markusen, James R.“The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, no. 2 (1995): 169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monthly Summary of Commerce and Finance. Grain Trade of the United States, January 1900.Google Scholar
Monthly Summary of Commerce and Finance. Provision Trade of the United States, February 1900.Google Scholar
Navin, Thomas R., & Sears, Marian V.. “A Study in Merger: Formation of the International Mercantile Marine Company” The Business History Review 28, no. 4 (1954): 291–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Prices Current, various dates.Google Scholar
New York Shipping and Commercial List, various dates.Google Scholar
Nimmo, Joseph Jr.Report on the Internal Commerce of the United States. Washington, DC: GPO, 1885.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin H., & Williamson, Jeffrey G.. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perren, Richard. The Meat Trade in Britain, 1840–1914. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar
Plimsoll, Samuel. Cattle Ships: Being the Fifth Chapter of Mr. Plimsoll's Second Appeal for Our Seamen. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, and Co., 1890.Google Scholar
Statistical Abstract of the United KingdomGoogle Scholar
Strand, Norman. Prices of Farm Products in Iowa, 1851–1940. Research Bulletin 303 Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, Ames, IA, 1942.Google Scholar
The Statistical Year Book of Canada for 1901.Google Scholar
U.K. Parliamentary Papers. Select Committee on Cattle Plague and Import of Cattle. 1877 IX.Google Scholar
U.K. Parliamentary Papers. Departmental Committee on the Transatlantic Cattle Trade. 1890/1 LXXVIII (C. 6350).Google Scholar
U.K. Parliamentary Papers. Departmental Committee on Combinations in the Meat Trade. 1909 XV (Cd 4661).Google Scholar
U.K. Parliamentary Papers. Departmental Committee on Shipping and Shipbuilding. 1918 XIII (Cd. 9092).Google Scholar
U.K. Parliamentary Papers. Reports of British Consuls in Boston, various dates.Google Scholar
Yeager, Mary.Competition and Regulation: The Development of Oligopoly in the Meat Packing Industry. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, 1985.Google Scholar