Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nwwvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-09T21:53:22.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulating the Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

C. Knick Harley  and
N.F.R. Crafts
C. Knick Harley
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 5C2. E-mail: [email protected]. N. F. R.
N.F.R. Crafts
Affiliation:
Department of Economic HistoryLondon School of Economics, Houghton St., London, United Kingdom WX2A 2AE. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines technical change, trade, economic structure, and growth during the British Industrial Revolution by means of computational general equilibrium (CGE) modeling. It rejects Peter Temin's contention that our “new view” of sectorally concentrated productivity growth is inconsistent with industrial export data. A CGE trade model with diminishing returns in agriculture and realistic assumptions about consumer demand shows that while technical change in cottons and iron were major spurs to exportation of those specific goods, the need for food imports also stimulated exports generally. Incorporating trade data thus enriches our “new view.”

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 819 - 841
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Robert C.. “Agriculture During the Industrial Revolution.” In The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, 2nd ed., vol. 1, edited by Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald, 96–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert C. “Tracking the Agricultural Revolution.“ Economic History Review 52, no. 2 (1999): 209–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, T. S.The Industrial Revolution 1760–1830. London: Oxford University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Bairoch, Paul. “International Industrialization Levels from 1750 to 1980.” Journal of European Economic History 11, no. 2 (1982): 269–333.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine, and Hudson, Pat. “Rehabilitating the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 45, no. 1 (1992): 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregoiy. “Too Much Revolution: Agriculture and the Industrial Revolution, 1700–1860.” Paper presented to Cliometrics Meeting, 1998.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R.British Economic Growth During the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., and Harley, C. Knick. “Output Growth and the British Industrial Revolution: A Restatement of the Crafts-Harley View.“ Economic History Review 45, no. 4 (1992): 703–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Ralph. “English Foreign Trade, 1700–1774.” Economic History Review 15, no. 2 (1962): 285–303.Google Scholar
Davis, Ralph.The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Deane, Phyllis, and Cole, W. A.. British Economic Growth, 1688–1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Edwards, Michael M.The Growth of the British Cotton Trade 1780–1815. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Farnie, Douglas A.The English Cotton Industry andthe WorldMarket 1815–1896. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H. “Appendix.” In Studies in Capital Formation in the UnitedKingdom, 1750–1920, edited by Feinstein, Charles H. and Pollard, Sidney, 425–71. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H. “Pessimism Perpetuated: Real Wages and the Standard of Living in Britain during and after the Industrial Revolution.“ This JOURNAL 58, no. 3 (1998): 625–58.Google Scholar
Gayer, Arthur D., Rostow, Walt W., and Schwartz, Anna D.. The Growth and Fluctuation of the British Economy, 1790–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Ethanan. “Technology and Trade.” In Handbook of International Economics, vol. 3, edited by Grossman, Gene M. and Rogoff, Kenneth, 1279–337. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1995.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “British Industrialization before 1841: Evidence of Slower Growth during the Industrial Revolution. ”This JOURNAL 42, no. 2 (1982): 267–89.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “The Antebellum American Tariff: Food Exports and Manufacturing.” Explorations in Economic History 29, no.4 (1992): 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “Reassessing the Industrial Revolution: A Macro View.” In The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective, edited by Mokyr, Joel, 171–226. Oxford: West- view Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “Cotton Textile Prices and the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 51, no. 1 (1998): 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C. Knick, and Crafts, N. F. R.. “Productivity Growth During the First Industrial Revolution: Inferences from the Pattern of British External Trade.” London School of Economics Working Papers in Economic History, no. 42, 1998.Google Scholar
Hoffinann, Walther G.British Industry, 1700–1950. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1955.Google Scholar
Imlah, Albert H.Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. T.Increasing Returns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Landes, David S.The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Landes, David S. “What Room for Accident in History? Explaining Big Changes by Small Events.” Economic History Review 47, no. 3 (1994): 637–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. “The Industrial Revolution: A Survey.” In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, 1st ed., vol. 1, edited by Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald N., 103–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R.British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick K. “Agriculture and the Home Market for English Industry, 1660–1820.” English Historical Review 100, no. 4 (1985): 773–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, Mark.The Agricultural Revolution in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlote, WernerBritish Overseas Tradefrom 1700 to the 1930s. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Shoven, John B., and Whalley, John. Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Thirukodikaval, Srinivasan N., and Whalley, John, eds. General Equilibrium Trade Policy Modeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. “Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution.” This JOURNAL 57, no. 1 (1997): 63–82.Google Scholar
Thomas, Brinley. “Food Supply in the United Kingdom during the Industrial Revolution ” In The Economics of the Industrial Revolution, edited by Mokyr, Joel, 137–50. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld, 1985.Google Scholar
Turner, Michael E., Beckett, John V., and Afton, Bethanie. Agricultural Rent in England, 1690–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Kingdom. Finance Accounts. In British Parliamentary Papers, vol. 5 (1830/1).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. “Debating the British Industrial Revolution.” Explorations in Economic History 24, no. 3 (1987): 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar