Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:20:57.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productivity, Extent of Markets, and Manufacturing in the Late Antebellum South and Midwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Viken Tchakerian
Viken Tchakerian
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses the Bateman-Weiss samples of manufacturing firms from 1850 and 1860 to estimate the labor and total factor productivity of southern and midwestern manufacturing industries in the late antebellum period. The results indicate rapid growth in productivity, especially in the South. The article also demonstrates a positive association between measured productivity, firm size, and urbanization. Differences in manufacturing performance between the South and the Midwest are shown to be crucially dependent on the extent of markets within the two regions.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 497 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atack, Jeremy, “Industrial Structure and the Emergence of the Modern Industrial Corporation,” Explorations in Economic History, 22 (01 1985), pp. 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, “Economies of Scale and Efficiency Gains in the Rise of the Factory in America, 1820–1900,” in Kilby, Peter, ed., From Quantity to Quidity (Middletown, CT, 1987), pp. 286–335.Google Scholar
Bateman, Fred, and Weiss, Thomas, “Comparative Regional Development in Antebellum Manufacturing,” this Journal, 35 (03 1975), pp. 182–208.Google Scholar
Bateman, Fred, and Weiss, Thomas, “Manufacturing in the Antebellum South,” in Uselding, Paul, ed., Research in Economic History (Greenwich, CT, 1976), vol. 1, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Bateman, Fred, and Weiss, Thomas, A Deplorable Scarcity (Chapel Hill, 1981).Google Scholar
Brady, Dorothy, “Price Deflators for Final Product Estimates,” in Brady, Dorothy, ed., Output, Employment, and Productivity in the United States after 1800 (Chicago, 1966), pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
Brownlee, W. Elliot, Dynamics of Ascent (2nd edn., Belmont, CA, 1988).Google Scholar
Clark, Victor S., History of Manufactures in the United States (Washington, DC, 1929), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Cole, Arthur, Wholesale Commodity Prices in the United States, 1700–1861 (Cambridge, MA, 1938), vol. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBow's Review (various issues).Google Scholar
Dollar, David, and Sokoloff, Kenneth, “The Organization of Manufacturing During Early Industrialization: A Model and Evidence on the Contrast Between Britain and the United States,” NBER paper No. 30 (09 1991).Google Scholar
Field, Alexander, “Sectoral Shift in Antebellum Massachusetts: A Reconsideration,” Explorations in Economic History, 15 (04 1978), pp. 146–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, Robert, Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
Genovese, Eugene, The Political Economy of Slavery (New York, 1965).Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi, and Ringstad, Vidar, Economies of Scale and the Form of the Production Function (Amsterdam, 1973).Google Scholar
Helper, Hinton, The Impending Crisis of the South (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
Huertas, Thomas F., “Damnifying Growth in the Antebellum South,” this Journal, 39 (03 1979), pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Kendrick, John, Productivity Trends in the United States (Princeton, 1961).Google Scholar
Marglin, Stephen, “What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 6 (Summer 1974), pp. 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Balthasar H. et al. , History of Transportation in the United States Before 1860 (Washington, DC, 1917).Google Scholar
Meyer, David R., “The Industrial Retardation of Southern Cities, 1860–1880,” Explorations in Economic History, 25 (10 1988), pp. 366–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Albert W. Jr., “Industrial Profits and Market Process: The Antebellum South,” Social Science History, 13 (Spring 1989), pp. 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, William N., “Slavery and Southern Economic Development: An Hypothesis and Some Evidence,” in Parker, William, ed., The Structure of the Cotton Economy of the Antebellum South (Washington, DC, 1970), pp. 115–25.Google Scholar
Phillips, Ulrich B., American Negro Slavery (New York, 1918).Google Scholar
Ross, Steven J., Workers on the Edge: Work, Leisure, and Politics in Industrializing Cincinnati, 1830–1890 (PhD. diss., Princeton University, 1980).Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth, “Was the Transition from the Artisanal Shop to the Non-Mechanized Factory Associated with Gains in Efficiency? Evidence from the U.S. Manufacturing Censuses of 1820 and 1850,” Explorations in Economic History, 21 (10 1984), pp. 351–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth, “Productivity Growth in Manufacturing During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the American Northeast, 1820–60,” in Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert, eds., Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth (Chicago, 1986), pp. 679–736.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846,” this Journal, 48 (12 1988), pp. 813–50.Google Scholar
Tchakerian, Viken, “Structure and Performance of Southern and Midwestern Manufacturing, 1850–60” (PhD. diss., UCLA, 1990).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Digest of Statistics of Manufactures (Washington, DC, 1858).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Eighth Census of the United States, Manufactures (Washington, DC, 1865).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Eighth Census of the United States, Population (Washington, DC, 1865).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Tenth Census of the United States, Manufactures (Washington, DC, 1883).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Eleventh Census of the United States, Manufactures (Washington, DC, 1893).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Historical Statistics of the United States from Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, DC, 1975), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Wallis, G., Whitworth, J., and Anderson, J., The American System of Manufactures (Edinburgh, [1854/1985], 1969).Google Scholar
Weiman, David, “Urban Growth on the Periphery of the Antebellum Cotton Belt: Atlanta, 1847–1860,” this Journal, 84 (06 1988), pp. 259–72.Google Scholar
Weiman, David, “Staple Crops and Slave Plantations: Alternative Perspectives on Regional Development in the Antebellum Cotton South,” in Ferleger, Lou, ed., Agriculture and National Development (Ames, IA, 1990), pp. 119–61.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin, “Cheap Labor and Southern Textiles Before 1880,” this Journal, 39 (09 1979), pp. 655–80.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin, Old South, New South (New York, 1986).Google Scholar