¹ North, Douglass C. and Weingast, Barry R., “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolutionof Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England,” this JOURNAL, 49 (12 1989), pp. 803–32.Google Scholar

² Ibid., p. 803.

³ Ibid., p. 819.

⁴ Ibid., pp. 809–12.

⁵ Ibid., pp. 816, 829.

⁶ See Shaw, W. A., ed., Calender of Treasury Books (London, 1908), vol. 3, p. xlviii.Google Scholar

⁷ The connection of the Stop with the Third Dutch War is consistent with North and Weingast's point that wars raise the discount rate of rulers and make repudiations of sovereign debt more likely.Google Scholar

⁸ Horsefield, J. Keith, “The ‘Stop of the Exchequer’ Revisited,” Economic History Review, 35 (11 1982), p. 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ The terms of the letters patent allowed the goldsmith-bankers the option of assigning a portion of the interest payments they received directly to their own creditors, most of whom were former depositors.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Horsefield, “The ‘Stop of the Exchequer,’” p. 517.Google Scholar

¹¹ Clay, C. G. A., Economic Expansion and Social Change: England 1500–1700 (Cambridge, 1984), vol. 2, p. 277.Google Scholar

¹² Holdsworth, Sir William, A History of English Law (3rd edn., London, 1944), vol. 9, pp. 8–15, 22–23.Google Scholar

¹³ The Court of Exchequer had jurisdiction over cases involving Crown revenue. A monstrans de droit was a fourteenth-century offshoot of the petition of right. For some situations it provided an alternative remedy against the Crown. See Holdsworth, A History, p. 25.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Ibid., p. 33.

¹⁵ Sachse, William L., Lord Somers: A Political Portrait (Manchester, 1975), p. 75.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Horsefield, “The ‘Stop of the xchequer,’” pp. 519–20.Google Scholar

¹⁷ See the Historical Manuscripts Commission, Manuscripts of the House of Lords, new series (London, 1905), vol. 3, pp. 407–9.Google Scholar

¹⁸ North and Weingast, “Constitutions and ommitment,” p. 820.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Burton, I. F., Riley, P. W. J., and Rowlands, E., Political Parties in the Reigns of William III and Anne (Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. Special Supplement No. 7, London, 1968), pp. 1–3Google Scholar; Johnson, Richard R., “Politics Redefined: An Assessment of Recent Writings on the Late Stuart Period of English History, 1660 to 1714,” William and Mary Quarterly, 35 (10 1978), pp. 705–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁰ Jones, J. R., The First Whigs: The Politics of the Exclusion Crisis, 1678–1683 (London, 1961), pp. 2, 4, 214.Google Scholar

²¹ Speck, W. A., Reluctant Revolutionaries: Englishmen and the Revolution of 1688 (Oxford, 1988), pp. 66, 128.Google Scholar

²² Horwitz, Henry, Parliament, Policy and Politics in the Reign of William III (Newark, 1977), pp. 217, 316–17.Google Scholar

²³ Holmes, Geoffrey, British Politics in the Age ofAnne (London, 1967), p. 63Google Scholar; Speck, W. A., Tory and Whig: The Struggle in the Constituencies, 1701–1715 (London, 1970), pp. 1, 22.Google Scholar

²⁴ Horwitz, Parliament, Policy and Politics, pp. 130–31;Google ScholarRubini, Dennis, “Politics and the battle for the Banks, 1688–1697,” English Historical Review, 337 (10 1970), p. 694.Google Scholar

²⁵ Holmes, Geoffrey, British Politics, p. 27;Google ScholarHill, B. W., The Growth of Parliamentary Parties, 1689–1742 (Hamden, 1976), p. 69.Google Scholar

²⁶ SirClapham, John, The Bank of England (Cambridge, 1945), vol. 1, pp. 74–75Google Scholar; Hill, B. W., “The Change of Government and the ‘Loss of the City,’ 1710–1711,” Economic History Review, 24 (08 1971), p. 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁷ Dickson, P. G. M., The Financial Revolution in England (London, 1967), p. 65.Google Scholar

²⁸ Brewer, John, The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783 (New York, 1989), p. 120Google Scholar; Sperling, John G., The South Sea Company (Boston, 1962), pp. 7, 14.Google Scholar

²⁹⁵ Horwitz, Henry, “The East India Trade, The Politicians, and the Constitution; 1689–1702,” Journal of British Studies, 17 (Spring 1978), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁰ Ibid., pp. 10–11.

³¹ Horwitz, Henry, Parliament, Policy and Politics, pp. 232–33;Google ScholarJones, D. W., War and Economy in the Age of William 111 and Marlborough (Oxford, 1988), pp. 221, 301.Google Scholar

³² North and Weingast, “Constitutions and Commitment,” p. 804.Google Scholar

³³ Miller, John, Popery and Politics in England, 1660–1688 (Cambridge, 1973), pp. 197, 202, 250;CrossRefGoogle ScholarSpeck, Reluctant Revolutionaries, p. 128.Google Scholar

³⁴ Speck, Reluctant Revolutionaries, pp. 233, 235.Google Scholar

³⁵ Giuseppi, J. A., “Sephardi Jews and the early years of The Bank of England” Transactions ofthe jewisjh Historical Society of England, 19, (1955–1959), pp. 53–54Google Scholar; Carter, A. C., “The Huguenot Contribution to the Early Years of the Funded Debt, 1694–1714” Proceedings of the Huguenot society of London, 19 (1955), p. 22.Google Scholar

³⁶ Lee, Maurice Jr, The Cabal (Urbana, 1965), p. 159.Google Scholar

³⁷ North and Weingast, “Constitutions and Commitments,” p. 805.Google Scholar