Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:33:21.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Peculiar Sample: A Reply to Steckel and Ziebarth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2016

Jonathan Pritchett  and
Herman Freudenberger
Jonathan Pritchett
Affiliation:
Jonathan Pritchett is Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles Avenue, 206 Tilton Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118. E-mail: [email protected]
Herman Freudenberger
Affiliation:
Herman Freudenberger is Professor Emeritus, Department of Economics, Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles Avenue, 206 Tilton Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Richard Steckel and Nicolas Ziebarth (2016) find that biases in height by age imposed by traders versus non-traders were negligible. Importantly, their method of identifying traders differs from that of Jonathan Pritchett and Herman Freudenberger (1992). Using a sample of inward coastwise manifests for the port of New Orleans, we show that Steckel and Ziebarth made errors classifying shippers, that they underestimate the relative number of slaves shipped by traders, and that their empirical estimates of selection bias are attenuated towards zero.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 139 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors benefited from the helpful comments and suggestions of James Alm, Stanley Engerman, Timothy Guinnane, and Paul Rhode.

References

REFERENCES

Bancroft, Frederic. Slave Trading in the Old South. Baltimore: J. H. Furst Company 1931.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, Guinnane, Timothy, and Mroz, Thomas. “Problems of Sample-Selection Bias in the Historical Heights Literature: A Theoretical and Econometric Analysis.” Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 1023, New Haven, CT, May 2013.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, Guinnane, Timothy, and Mroz, Thomas. “Caveat Lector: Sample Selection in Historical Heights and the Interpretation of Early Industrializing Economies.” NBER Working Paper No. 19955, Cambridge, MA, March 2014.Google Scholar
Calomiris, Charles, and Pritchett, Jonathan. “Preserving Slave Families for Profit: Traders' Incentives and Pricing in the New Orleans Slave Market.” Journal of Economic History 69, no. 4 (2009): 986 – 1011.Google Scholar
Choo, Eugene, and Eid, Jean. “Interregional Price Difference in the New Orleans Auctions Market for Slaves.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 26, no. 4 (October 2008): 486 – 509.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W. and Engerman, Stanley L.. Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Boston: Little Brownm 1974.Google Scholar
Freudenberger, Herman, and Pritchett, Jonathan. “The Domestic United States Slave Trade: New Evidence.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 21, no. 3 (1991): 447–77.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Bruce C. and Glasspiegel, Robert R.. “Adverse Selection in the Market for Slaves: New Orleans: 1830–1860.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, no. 3 (1983): 479–99.Google Scholar
Johnson, Walter. Soul By Soul: Life inside the Antebellum Slave Market. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1999.Google Scholar
Komlos, John, and Alecke, Bjorn. “The Economics of Antebellum Slave Heights Reconsidered.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 26, no. 3 (1996): 437 – 57.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, Laurence. “The Structure of Slave Prices in New Orleans, 1804 to 1862.” Economic Inquiry 17, no. 4 (1979): 496 – 517.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, Laurence. “Quantitative Description of the New Orleans Slave Market, 1804 to 1862.” In Without Consent or Contract: Markets and Production, Technical Papers, 1, edited by Fogel, Robert W. and Engerman, Stanley L., 31 – 53. New York: W. W. Norton 1992.Google Scholar
Levendis, John. “Qualities and Effective-Quantities of Slaves in New Orleans.” Southwestern Economic Review 34, no. 1 (2007): 161 – 77.Google Scholar
Margo, Robert A. and Steckel, Richard H.. “The Heights of American Slaves: New Evidence on Slave Nutrition and Health.” Social Science History 6, no. 4 (1982): 516–38.Google Scholar
New Orleans City Archive. “Slaves Arrived in New Orleans, 1831.” 1831.Google Scholar
Oxford American College Dictionary. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons c2002.Google Scholar
Phillips, Ulrich B. Life & Labor in the Old South. Boston: Little Brown and Company 1929.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Jonathan. “The Interregional Slave Trade and the Selection of Slaves for the New Orleans Market.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 28, no. 1 (1997): 57 – 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, Jonathan, and Chamberlain, Richard M.. “Selection in the Market for Slaves: New Orleans, 1830–1860.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 2 (1993): 461–73.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Jonathan, and Freudenberger, Herman. “A Peculiar Sample: The Selection of Slaves for the New Orleans Market.” Journal of Economic History 52, no. 1 (1992): 109–27.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard. “Slave Height Profiles from Coastwise Manifests.” Explorations in Economic History 16, no. 4 (1979): 363–80.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard, and Ziebarth, Nicolas. “A Troublesome Statistic: Traders and Coastal Shipments in the Westward Movement of Slaves.” Journal of Economic History 73, no. 3 (2013): 792–809.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard, and Ziebarth, Nicolas. “Trader Selectivity and Measured Catch-Up Growth of American Slaves.” Journal of Economic History 76, no. 1 (2016): 109 – 138.Google Scholar
Tadman, Michael. “Slave Trading in the Ante-Bellum South: An Estimate of the Extent of the Inter-Regional Slave Trade.” Journal of American Studies 13, no. 2 (1979): 195 – 220.Google Scholar
Tadman, Michael. Speculators and Slaves: Masters, Traders, and Slaves in the Old South. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1989.Google Scholar
Webster's New World Dictionary, Second College Edition. New York: Prentice Hall Press 1984.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pritchett and Freudenberger supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Pritchett and Freudenberger supplementary material(File)
File 43.6 KB