Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:58:41.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pay Cuts for the Boss: Executive Compensation in the 1940s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2012

CAROLA FRYDMAN  and
RAVEN MOLLOY
CAROLA FRYDMAN*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics, Boston University, 270 Bay State Road, Room 307, Boston, MA 02215; and NBER. E-mail: [email protected].
RAVEN MOLLOY*
Affiliation:
Senior Economist, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, 20th and C Streets NW, Washington, DC 20551. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Executive pay fell during the 1940s, marking the last notable decrease in the past 70 years. We study this decline using a new panel data set on the remuneration of top executives in 246 firms. Government regulation—including explicit salary restrictions and taxation—had, at best, a modest effect on executive pay. By contrast, a decline in the returns to firm size and an increase in the power of labor unions contributed greatly to the reduction in executive compensation relative to other workers’ earnings from 1940 to 1946. The continued decrease in relative executive pay remains largely unexplained.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , 12 March 2012 , pp. 225 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Autor, David, Katz, Lawrence, and Kearney, Melissa. “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90, no. 2 (2004): 300–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B., Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. “Top Incomes in the Long Run of History.” NBER Working Paper No. 15408, Cambridge, MA, October 2009.Google Scholar
Bailey, Martha J., and William, J. Collins. “The Wage Gains of African American Women in the 1940s.” The Journal of Economic History 66, no. 3 (2006): 737–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, G., and Price, R.. Profiles of Union Growth. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar
Baker, John Calhoun. “Fluctuation in Executive Compensation of Selected Companies, 1928–1936.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 20 (1938): 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, A.“Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates.” Journal of Human Resources 8 (1973): 436–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, D. “The Effects of Unions on the Distribution of Wages: Redistribution or Relabelling?” NBER Working Paper 4195, Cambridge, MA, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelo, Harry, and DeAngelo, Linda. “Union Negotiations and Corporate Policy: A Study of Labor Concessions in the Domestic Steel Industry During the 1980s.” Journal of Financial Economics 30 (1991): 3–43.Google Scholar
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N.M., and Lemieux, T.. “Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973–1992: A Semiparametric Approach.” Econometrica 64 (1996): 1001–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiNardo, J., Hallock, Kevin, and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. “Unions and Managerial Pay.” NBER Working Paper No. 6318, Cambridge, MA, December 1997.Google Scholar
Douglas, Paul H.“What is Happening to the ‘White-Collar-Job’ Market?” System: The Magazine of Business 49, December, 1926.Google Scholar
Firpo, Sergio, Fortin, Nicole, and Lemieux, Thomas. “Decomposing Wage Distributions using Recentered Influence Function Regressions.” Working Paper, 2007.Google Scholar
Firpo, Sergio, Fortin, Nicole, and Lemieux, Thomas. “Unconditional Quantile Regressions.” ? Econometrica 77, no. 3 (2009): 953–73.Google Scholar
Freeman, R.B. “How Much Has Deunionization Contributed to the Rise of Male Earnings Inequality?’ In Uneven Tides: Rising Income Inequality in America, edited by Danziger, Sheldon and Gottschalk, Peter, 133–63. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1993.Google Scholar
Freeman, R.B. “Spurts in Union Growth: Defining Moments and Social Processes” In The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century, edited by Bordo, Michael, Goldin, Claudia and White, Eugene, 265–96. University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Frydman, Carola, and Jenter, Dirk. “CEO Compensation.” Annual Review of Financial Economics 2, no. 1 (2011): 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydman, Carola, and Molloy, Raven. “Does Tax Policy Affect Executive Compensation? Evidence from postwar Tax Reforms.” Journal of Public Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Frydman, Carola, and Raven, E. Saks. “Executive Compensation: A New View from a Long-Term Perspective, 1936–2005.” Review of Financial Studies 23, May (2010): 2099–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, Xavier, and Landier, Agustin. “Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 123, no. 1 (2008): 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Katz, Lawrence. The Race Between Education and Technology. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Robert, A. Margo. “The Great Compression: The Wage Structure in the United States at Mid-Century.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, February (1992): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goolsbee, Austan. “Evidence on the High-Income Laffer Curve from Six Decades of Tax Reform.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1999): 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, John R., Li, Si, and Qiu, Jiaping. “Managerial Attributes and Executive Compensation.” Duke University Working Paper, 2009.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jon, and Saez, Emmanuel. ‘The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications,” Journal of Public Economics 84 (2002): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Howell J.The Right to Manage: Industrial Relations Policies of American Business in the 1940s. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hunstman, Blaine, and Wilbur, G. Lewellen. “Managerial Pay and Corporate Performance.” American Economic Review 60, no. 4 (1970): 710–20.Google Scholar
Juhn, Chinhui. “Wage Inequality and Demand for Skill: Evidence from Five Decades.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52 (1999): 424–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Clark. “Employer Policies in Industrial Relations, 1945 to 1947.” In Labor in Postwar America, edited by Warne, Colston E. and others, 43–77. New York: Remsen Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. Shares of Upper Income Groups in Income and Savings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1953.Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley. “Wage Structures.” The Review of Economic Statistics 29 (November 1947): 274–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leff, Mark. H. “The Politics of Sacrifice on the American Home Front in World War II.” The Journal of American History 77, no. 4 (1991): 1296–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewellen, Willbur G.Executive Compensation in Large Industrial Corporations. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1968.Google Scholar
Machado, J., and Mata, J.. “Counterfactual Decomposition of Changes in Wage Distributions Using Quantile Regression.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 20 (2005): 445–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millis, Harry, and Brown, Emily Clark. From the Wagner Act to Taft-Hartley: A Study of National Labor Policy and Labor Relations. Chicago: TheUniversity of Chicago Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin J. “Executive Compensation.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3B, edited by Ashenfelter, Orley and Card, David. Amsterdam, New York: North Holland, 1999.Google Scholar
National Industrial Conference Board. “Top Executive Compensation.” Studies in Personnel Policy, various dates.Google Scholar
Oaxaca, R.“Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets.” International Economic Review 14, no. 3 (1973): 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, Harry. “Occupational Wage Differentials, 1907–1947.” Monthly Labor Review, August (1948): 27–134.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. “Income Inequality in the United States: 1913–1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (2003): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockoff, Hugh. Drastic Measures: a History of Wage and Price Controls in the United States. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin. “Contracts and the Market for Executives.” In Contract Economics, edited by Lars Werin and Hans Wijkander. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Saez, Emmanuel. “Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960–2000: Evidence and Policy Implications.” In Tax Policy and the Economy 18, edited by Poterba, James, Cambridge, MA: TheMIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Saez, Emmanuel, Slemrod, Joel B., and Seth, H. Giertz. “The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: A Critical Review.” NBER Working Paper No. 15012, 2009.Google Scholar
Slemrod, Joel B. “The Economics of Taxing the Rich.” In Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich, edited by Slemrod, Joel B., 3–27. New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation, 2000.Google Scholar
Smith, James P., and Finis, R. Welch. “Black Economic Progress After Myrdal.” Journal of Economic Literature 27, no. 2 (1989): 519–64.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J.Trends in Employment in the Service Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Taft, Philip. Organized Labor in American History. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Manufactures, 1939. Vol. 1, Table 5. Washington, DC: GPO, 1942.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Manufactures, 1947. Vol. 1, Table 2. Washington, DC: GPO, 1950.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. National Income and Product Accounts. Table 6.6, http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1 (downloaded May 2009).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. National Income: A Supplement to the Survey of Current Business, 1951. Prepared by the National Income Division, Office of Business Economics. Washington, DC: GPO, 1951.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. National Income: A Supplement to the Survey of Current Business, 1958. Prepared by the National Income Division, Office of Business Economics. Washington, DC: GPO, 1958.Google Scholar