Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:28:27.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Banking's Role in U.S. Industrialization, 1850–1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2014

Matthew Jaremski
Matthew Jaremski*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, Hamilton, NY 13346. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The passage of the National Banking Acts stabilized the existing financial system and encouraged the entry of 729 banks between 1863 and 1866. These new banks concentrated in the area that would eventually become the Manufacturing Belt. Using a new bank census, the article shows that these changes to the financial system were a major determinant of the geographic distribution of manufacturing and the nation's sudden capital deepening. The entry not only resulted in more manufacturing capital and output at the county level, but also more steam engines and value added at the establishment level.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 109 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Peter Rousseau, Jeremy Atack, Richard Sylla, Robert Margo, Jon Moen, Greg Niemesh, and Hugh Rockoff for their comments on various drafts, as well as Paul Rhode and the two referees for their insightful and detailed suggestions. The article has also greatly benefited from seminar participants at the NBER Development of the American Economy and NYU-Stern, and financial support from the Economic History Association.

References

REFERENCES

Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred. “U.S. Historical Statistics: Nineteenth-Century U.S. Industrial Development Through the Eyes of the Census of Manufactures.” Historical Methods 32, no. 4 (1999): 177-88.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Bateman, Fred, Haines, Michael, and Margo, Robert. “Did Railroads Induce or Follow Economic Growth? Urbanization and Population Growth in the American Midwest, 1850-1860.” Social Science History 34, no. 2 (2010): 171-97.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Bateman, Fred, and Margo, Robert. “Capital Deepening in American Manufacturing, 1850-1880.” NBER Working Paper No. 9923, Cambridge, MA, August 2003.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Bateman, Fred, and Margo, Robert. “Steam Power, Establishment Size, and Labor Productivity Growth in Nineteenth-Century American Manufacturing.” Explorations in Economic History 45, no. 2 (2008): 185-98.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Bateman, Fred, and Weiss, Thomas. “The Regional Diffusion and Adoption of the Steam Engine in American Manufacturing.” The Journal of Economic History 40, no. 2 (1980): 281–308.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Haines, Michael, and Margo, Robert. “Railroads and the Rise of the Factory: Evidence for the United States, 1850-1870.” In Economic Evolution and Revolution in Historical Time, edited by Rhode, Paul, Rosenbloom, Joshua, and Weiman, David, 162–79. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859-1877. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles, and Beard, Mary. The Rise of American Civilization. New York: MacMillian, 1927.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, and Cuberes, David. “Financial Development and City Growth: Evidence from Northeastern American Cities, 1790-1870.” NBER Working Paper No. 15997, Cambridge, MA, May 2010.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Davis, Andrew. The Origin of the National Banking System. Washington: GPO, 1910.Google Scholar
Davis, Joseph. “An Index of U.S. Industrial Production, 1790-1915.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, no. 4 (2004): 1177–1215.Google Scholar
Davis, Lance. “The Investment Market, 1870-1914: The Evolution of a National Market.” The Journal of Economic History 25, no. 3 (1965): 355-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Lance, and Gallman, Robert. “Capital Formation in the United States During the Nineteenth Century.” In Cambridge Economic History of Europe Volume VII: The Industrial Economies: Capital, Labour, and Enterprise, Pt. 2, edited by Mathias, Peter and Postan, M., 1–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
DeGeer, Sten. “The American Manufacturing Belt.” Geografiska Annaler 9 (1927): 233–359.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L. “The Economic Impact of the Civil War.” Explorations in Entrepreneurial History 3, no. 2 (1966): 176-99.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L.. “Technology and Industrialization, 1790-1914.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Volume II, edited by Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert, 367–401. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander. “Sectoral Shift in Antebellum Massachusetts: A Reconsideration.” Exploration in Economic History 15, no. 2 (1978): 146-71.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. American Railroads and the Transformation of the Ante-Bellum Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Fulford, Scott. “If Financial Development Matters, Then How? National Banks in the United States, 1870-1900.” Boston College Working Paper No. 723, Boston, MA, 2012. Gallman, Robert. “Value Added by Agriculture, Mining, and Manufacturing in the United States, 1840-1880.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1956.Google Scholar
Gische, David. “The New York City Banks and the Development of the National Banking System, 1860-1870.” American Journal of Legal History 23 (1979): 21–67.Google Scholar
Hacker, Louis. The Triumph of American Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael. Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790-2000. ICPSR Study 2896. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2004.Google Scholar
Horan, Patrick, and Hargis, Peggy. County Longitudinal Template, 1840-1990. ICPSR6576. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1995.Google Scholar
James, John. “The Development of the National Money Market: 1893-1911.” The Journal of Economic History 36, no. 4 (1976): 878-97.Google Scholar
Jaremski, Matthew. “State Banks and the National Banking Acts: Measuring the Response to Increased Financial Regulation, 1860-1870.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 45, no. 2-3 (2013): 379-99.Google Scholar
Jaremski, Matthew, and Rousseau, Peter. “Banks, Free Banks, and Economic Growth.” Economic Inquiry 51, no. 2 (2013): 1603–21.Google Scholar
Keehn, Richard. “Federal Bank Policy, Bank Market Structure, and Bank Performance: Wisconsin, 1863-1914.” Business History Review 48, no. 1 (1974): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Alexander, and Crafts, Nicholas. “Making Sense of the Manufacturing Belt: Determinants of U.S. Industrial Location, 1880-1920.” CAGE Online Working Paper, 2010.Google Scholar
King, Robert, and Levine, Ross. “Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3 (1993): 717-37.Google Scholar
Meyer, David. “Emergence of the American Manufacturing Belt.” Journal of Historical Geography 9, no. 2 (1983): 145-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David. “Midwestern Industrialization and the American Manufacturing Belt in the Nineteenth Century.” The Journal of Economic History 49, no. 4 (1989): 921-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David. Networked Machinists: High-Technology Industries in Antebellum America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Ronald. Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Minnesota Population Center. National Historical Geographic Information System: Pre-Release Version 0.1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Available online at http://www.nhgis.org, 2004.Google Scholar
Niemi, Albert. State and Regional Patterns in American Manufacturing, 1860-1900. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1974.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. The Economic Growth of the United States, 1790-1860. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: W. W. Norton & Company, 1961.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Anthony. “Factory Size, Economies of Scale, and the Great Merger Wave of 1898-1902.” The Journal of Economic History 48, no. 3 (1988): 639-49.Google Scholar
Officer, Lawrence. “What Was the Value of the U.S. Consumer Bundle Then?” MeasuringWorth. Available online at http://www.measuringworth.org/consumer/, 2008.Google Scholar
Perloff, Harvey. Regions, Resources, and Economic Growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Porter, Glenn, and Livesay, Harold. Merchants and Manufacturers: Studies in the Changing Structure of Nineteenth-Century Marketing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger. Conflict and Compromise: The Political Economy of Slavery, Emancipation, and the American Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard. “Debt Peonage in the Cotton South After the Civil War.” The Journal of Economic History 32, no. 3 (1972): 641-69.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard. One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Redenius, Scott. Between Reforms: The U.S. Banking System in the Postbellum Period. Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 2002.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Peter, and Sylla, Richard. “Emerging Financial Markets and Early U.S. Growth.” Explorations in Economic History 42, no. 1 (2005): 1–26.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Peter, and Wachtel, Paul. “What is Happening to the Impact of Financial Deepening on Economic Growth?” Economic Inquiry 49, no. 1 (2011): 276-88.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Dunker & Humblot, 1912; Translated by Redvers Opie. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth. “Productivity Gains in Manufacturing During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the American Northeast, 1820-1860.” In Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, Vol. 51, edited by Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert, 679–729. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Sylla, Richard. “Federal Policy, Banking Market Structure, and Capital Mobilization in the United States, 1863-1913.” The Journal of Economic History 29, no. 4 (1969): 657-86.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ross. Structures of Change in the Mechanical Age: Technological Innovation in the United States, 1790-1865. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Warren. Listing of all State Banks with Beginning and Ending Dates. Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Available online at http://research.mpls.frb.fed.us/research/economists/wewproj.html, 2005.Google Scholar
Weber, Warren. Balance Sheets for U.S. Antebellum State Banks. Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Available online at http://research.mpls.frb.fed.us/research/economists/wewproj.html, 2008.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey. “The Railroads and Midwestern Development 1870-90: A General Equilibrium History.” In Essays in Nineteenth-Century Economic History, edited by Klingaman, D. and Vedder, R., 269–352. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
White, Eugene. The Regulation and Reform of the American Banking System, 1900-1929. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar