Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:33:43.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-Run Impacts of Agricultural Shocks on Educational Attainment: Evidence from the Boll Weevil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2020

Richard B. Baker ,
John Blanchette  and
Katherine Eriksson
Richard B. Baker
Affiliation:
Richard B. Baker is Assistant Professor of Economics, The College of New Jersey, School of Business, PO Box 7718, 2000 Pennington Road, Ewing, NJ08628–0718. E-mail: [email protected]
John Blanchette
Affiliation:
John Blanchette is Ph.D. candidate in Economics, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA95616-8617. E-mail: [email protected]
Katherine Eriksson
Affiliation:
Katherine Eriksson is Assistant Professor of Economics, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA95616–8617; Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research; and Research Affiliate at Laboratory for the Economics of Africa’s Past, University of Stellenbosch. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The boll weevil spread across the South from 1892 to 1922 with devastating effect on cotton cultivation. The resulting shift away from this child labor–intensive crop lowered the opportunity cost of school attendance. We investigate the insect’s long-run effect on educational attainment using a sample of adults from the 1940 census linked back to their childhood census records. Both white and black children who were young (ages 4 to 9) when the weevil arrived saw increased educational attainment by 0.24 to 0.36 years. Our results demonstrate the potential for conflict between child labor in agriculture and educational attainment.

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 136 - 174
Copyright
© The Economic History Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to James Feigenbaum, Paul Rhode, and Marianne H. Wanamaker for providing feedback on earlier versions of this paper. We thank workshop participants at the University of California Davis, The College of New Jersey, the 2018 World Economic History Congress, and North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society for their helpful comments and suggestions. We owe special thanks to Celeste K. Carruthers and Marianne H. Wanamaker for generously sharing with us their county-level administrative data on schools.

References

REFERENCES

Aaronson, Daniel, and Mazumder, Bhashkar. “The Impact of Rosenwald Schools on Black Achievement.” Journal of Political Economy 119, no. 5 (2011): 821–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramitzky, Ran, Boustan, Leah Platt, and Eriksson, Katherine. “Europe’s Tired, Poor, Huddled Masses: Self-Selection and Economic Outcomes in the Age of Mass Migration.” American Economic Review 102, no. 5 (2012): 1832–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ager, Philipp, Brueckner, Markus, and Herz, Benedikt. “The Boll Weevil Plague and its Effect on the Southern Agricultural Sector, 1899–1929.” Explorations in Economic History 65 (2017): 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Martha, Cole, Connor, Henderson, Morgan, and Massey, Catherine. “How Well Do Automated Linking Methods Perform in Historical Data? Evidence from New U.S. Ground Truth.” NBER Working Paper No. 24019, Cambridge, MA, November 2017.Google Scholar
Baird, Sarah, Hicks, Joan Hamory, Kremer, Michael, and Miguel, Edward. “Worms at Work: Long-Run Impacts of a Child Health Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 131, no. 4 (2016): 1637–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, Richard B. “From the Field to the Classroom: The Boll Weevil’s Impact on Education in Rural Georgia.” Journal of Economic History 75, no. 4 (2015): 1128–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Richard B.. “School Resources and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Early Twentieth-Century Georgia.” Economics of Education Review 70 (2019): 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Richard B., Blanchette, John, and Eriksson, Katherine. “Replication: Long-Run Impacts of Agricultural Shocks on Educational Attainment: Evidence from the Boll Weevil.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-12-02. https://doi.org/10.3886/E115906V1.Google Scholar
Bandara, Amarakroon, Dehejia, Rajeev, and Lavie-Rouse, Shaheen. “The Impact of Income and Non-Income Shocks on Child Labor: Evidence from a Panel Survey of Tanzania.” World Development 67 (2015): 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beegle, Kathleen, Dehejia, Rajeev, and Gatti, Roberta. “Why Should We Care about Child Labor? The Education, Labor Market, and Health Consequences of Child Labor.” Journal of Human Resources 44, no. 4 (2009): 871–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanden, Jo, and Gregg, Paul. “Family Income and Educational Attainment: A Review of Approaches and Evidence for Britain.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20, no. 2 (2004): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleakley, Hoyt. “Disease and Development: Evidence from Hookworm Eradication in the American South.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, no. 1 (2007): 73–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloome, Deirdre, Feigenbaum, James, and Muller, Christopher. “Tenancy, Marriage, and the Boll Weevil Infestation, 1892–1930.” Demography 54, no. 3 (2017): 1029–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boozer, Michael A., and Tavneet, K. Suri. “Child Labor and Schooling Decisions in Ghana.” Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT, September 2001.Google Scholar
Borusyak, Kirill, and Jaravel, Xavier. “Revisiting Event Study Designs, with an Application to the Estimation of the Marginal Propensity to Consume.” Working paper, 2017. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2826228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Frances Sage, and Margaretta, A. Williamson. Rural Children in Selected Counties of North Carolina. U.S. Children’s Bureau, Rural Child Welfare Series No. 2. Washington, DC: GPO, 1918.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Celeste K., and Marianne, H. Wanamaker. “Separate and Unequal in the Labor Market: Human Capital and the Jim Crow Wage Gap.” Journal of Labor Economics 35, no. 3 (2017): 655–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, Raj, John, N. Friedman, Hilger, Nathaniel, Saez, Emmanuel, Schanzenbach, Diane Whitmore, and Yagan, Danny. “How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings? Evidence from Project Star.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, no. 4 (2011): 1593–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clay, Karen, Schmick, Ethan, and Troesken, Werner. “The Rise and Fall of Pellagra in the American South.” NBER Working Paper No. 23730, Cambridge, MA, August 2017.Google Scholar
Collins, William J., and Robert, A. Margo. “Historical Perspectives on Racial Differences in Schooling in the United States.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 1, edited by Eric, A. Hanushek and Welch, Finis, 107–54. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2006.Google Scholar
Dammert, Ana C. “Child Labor and Schooling Response to Changes in Coca Production in Rural Peru.” Journal of Development Economics 86, no. 1 (2008): 164–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Patrick M., Ponczek, Vladimir, and André Portela Souza. “Child Labor and Learning.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 65, no. 2 (2017): 265–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, Katherine. “Education and Incarceration in the Jim Crow South: Evidence from Rosenwald Schools.” Journal of Human Resources, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Evans, David K., and Ngatia, Muthoni. “School Costs, Short-Run Participation, and Long-Run Outcomes: Evidence from Kenya.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8421, April 2018.Google Scholar
Giesen, James C.Boll Weevil Blues: Cotton, Myth, and Power in the American South. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, Victoria, Peter, F. Orazem, and Mario, A. Sánchez. “Child Labor and School Achievement in Latin America.” World Bank Economic Review 20, no. 1 (2006): 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, Michael R., and Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790–2002. ICPSR02896-v3. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR, 2010.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., Moon, Seong Hyeok, Pinto, Rodrigo, Savelyev, Peter A., and Yavitz, Adam. “The Rate of Return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program.” Journal of Public Economics 94, no. 1–2 (2010): 114–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, Robert. “The Boll Weevil, the Cotton Economy, and Black Migration 1910–1930.” Agricultural History 50, no. 2 (1976): 334–50.Google Scholar
Holley, William C., and Lloyd, E. Arnold. Changes in Technology and Labor Requirements in Crop Production: Cotton. Works Progress Administration, National Research Project Report No. A-7. Philadelphia, PA, 1938.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. D. “Statement of Mr. W. D. Hunter, in Charge of Southern Field-Crop Insect Investigations, Bureau of Entomology.” In Agriculture Appropriation Bill: Hearings Before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives. Washington, DC: GPO, 1916.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. D., and Coad, B. R.. The Boll Weevil Problem. Washington, DC: GPO, 1923.Google Scholar
Jensen, Robert. “Agricultural Volatility and Investments in Children.” American Economic Review 90, no. 2 (2000): 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Fabian, Alan, L. Olmstead, and Paul, W. Rhode. “The Impact of the Boll Weevil, 1892–1932.” Journal of Economic History 69, no. 3 (2009): 685–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lleras-Muney, Adriana. “Were Compulsory Attendance and Child Labor Laws Effective? An Analysis from 1915 to 1939.” Journal of Law and Economics 45, no. 2 (2002): 401–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, Paul. “Examining the Effect of Economic Shocks on the Schooling Choices of Southern Farmers.” European Review of Economic History 23, no. 2 (2019): 214–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louisiana Department of Education. Biennial Report of the State Superintendent of Education of Public Education to the General Assembly. Baton Rouge, LA: The Advocate, 1902.Google Scholar
Louisiana Department of Education. Proceedings of the Conference of Parish Superintendents of Public Education. Baton Rouge, LA: Daily State Publishing, 1908.Google Scholar
Louisiana Board of Health. Biennial Report of the Louisiana State Board of Health to the Legislature of the State of Louisiana, 1928–1929. New Orleans, LA: State Printer, 1930.Google Scholar
Matthews, Ellen Nathalie, and Helen, M. Dart. The Welfare of Children in Cotton-Growing Areas of Texas. U.S. Children’s Bureau, Publication No. 134. Washington, DC: GPO, 1924.Google Scholar
Mississippi Department of Public Education. Biennial Report and Recommendations of the State Superintendent of Public Education to the Legislature of Mississippi. Nashville, TN: Brandon Printing, 1907.Google Scholar
Moehling, Carolyn M. “State Child Labor Laws and the Decline of Child Labor.” Explorations in Economic History 36, no. 1 (1999): 72–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moehling, Carolyn M. “Family Structure, School Attendance, and Child Labor in the American South in 1900 and 1910.” Explorations in Economic History 41, no. 1 (2004): 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemesh, Gregory T. “Ironing Out Deficiencies: Evidence from the United States on the Economic Effects of Iron Deficiency.” Journal of Human Resources 50, no. 4 (2015): 910–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, M. Bruce, and Reynoldson, L. A.. Standards of Labor on the Hill Farms of Louisiana. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bulletin No. 961. Washington, DC: GPO, 1921.Google Scholar
Osband, Kent. “The Boll Weevil Versus ‘King Cotton’.” Journal of Economic History 45, no. 3 (1985): 627–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Flood, Sarah, Goeken, Ronald, Grover, Josiah, Meyer, Erin, Pacas, Jose, and Sobek, Matthew. IPUMS, USA: Version 8.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2018.Google Scholar
Taubman, Paul. “Role of Parental Income in Educational Attainment.” American Economic Review 79, no. 2 (1989): 57–61.Google Scholar
Tennessee Department of Education. Annual Report of the Department of Education. Nashville, TN: Ambrose-Nashville, 1924.Google Scholar
Texas Department of Education. Biennial Report of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. Austin, TX: Gammel-Statesman Publishing, 1905.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Thirteenth Census of the United States: 1910. 11 vols. Washington, DC: GPO, 1913.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Children in Gainful Occupations at the Fourteenth Census of the United States. Washington, DC: GPO, 1924.Google Scholar
Census Office, U.S.. Eleventh Census of the United States: Instructions to Enumerators. Washington, DC: GPO, 1890.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. By the Sweat and Toil of Children Volume II: The Use of Child Labor in U.S. Agricultural Imports and Forced and Bonded Child Labor. Washington, DC, 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor. Washington, DC, 2018.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Baker et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Baker et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB