Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:31:45.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and Peace: Contracts and the Success of the Danish Dairy Cooperatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2012

INGRID HENRIKSEN ,
MORTEN HVIID  and
PAUL SHARP
INGRID HENRIKSEN*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 K⊘benhavn K, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected].
MORTEN HVIID*
Affiliation:
Director of the ESRC Centre for Competition Policy and Professor of Law, UEA Law School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. E-mails: [email protected].
PAUL SHARP*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. E-mails: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the successful early emergence of cooperative creameries in Denmark in the late nineteenth century within the framework of the “new institutional economics” presented by Oliver Williamson. Previous work focused on the social cohesion of the Danes, but we demonstrate that this was not sufficient for their success. The Danish legal system, which we compare to that of other countries, was also of crucial importance, along with the way in which rules were monitored and enforced. Of particular interest is the Danish cooperatives’ use of contracts, which we explore with evidence from a variety of primary and secondary sources.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , 12 March 2012 , pp. 197 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, James C., and Fant, James. Notes on Agricultural Cooperation in the Netherlands. Dublin: The Sackville Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Ahlerup, Pelle, Olsson, Ola, and Yanagizawa, David. “Social Capital vs. Institutions in the Growth Process.” European Journal of Political Economy 25, no. 1 (2009): 1–14.Google Scholar
Atiyah, Patrick S.An Introduction to the Law of Contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abjihit, Besley, Timothy, and Timothy, W. Guinnane. “Thy Neighbor's Keeper: The Design of a Credit Cooperative with Theory and a Test.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, no. 2 (1994): 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Donald M., and Christopher, E. Ondeck. “The Capper-Volstead Act: Opportunity Today and Tomorrow.” Mimeo, University of Wisconsin. Center for Cooperatives, 1997. Also available online at http://www.uwcc.wisc.edu/info/capper.html.Google Scholar
Bjørn, Claus. Dansk mejeribrug, 1882–1914. Odense: Landbohistorisk Selskab, 1982.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Theodor. Die dänische Landwirtschaft. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1908.Google Scholar
Bøggild, Bernhard. Kortfattet Mælkerilære for Elever i Landbrugsskoler. København: Ernst Bojesen, 1899.Google Scholar
Bøggild, Bernhard. Mælkeribruget i Danmark. 4. udg. København: Gyldendal og Nordisk Forlag, 1916.Google Scholar
Buch, Leon. “Investeringerne indenfor mejerierne og slagterierne.” Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift 98 (1960): 131–51.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert. Contract, Irish Law Texts. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1982.Google Scholar
Colvin, Christopher L. “God and Risk: The Role of Religion in Early-Twentieth-Century Dutch Rural Cooperative Banking.” Mimeo, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics & Political Science, November 2010.Google Scholar
Cook, Michael L., Chaddad, Fabio R., and Iliopoulos, Constantine. “Advances in Cooperative Theory Since 1990: A Review of Agricultural Economics Literature.” In Restructuring Agricultural Cooperatives, edited by George, W.J., 65–89.Google Scholar
Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam School of Management, 2004. Danmarks Mejeri-drifts-statistik, 1898–1904. Aarhus: Kontoret for Mejeri-statistik.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction for Ireland. Report on Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Conditions in Denmark, Bulletin No. 7, 1903.Google Scholar
Dyrbye, Ernst. Retsforholdet mellem andelsforeninger og deres medlemmer. København: Fællesbanken for Danmarks Sparekasser, 1954.Google Scholar
Fay, C.R.Cooperation at Home and Abroad: A Description and Analysis. London: P. S. King and Son, 1908.Google Scholar
Fernández, Eva. “Determinants of Agricultural Cooperatives in the Western World, 1880–1930.” Mimeo, Department of Economic History and Institutions, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2010.Google Scholar
Frederick, Donald A. “Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives: The Story of the Capper-Volstead Act.” United States Department of Agriculture. Rural Business-Cooperative Service. Cooperative Information Report 59. September 2002. http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/pub/cir59.pdf.Google Scholar
Galassi, F.L. “Screening, Monitoring and Incentives in Cooperative Banks: The Case of Italy's Casse Rurali, 1883–1926.” Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, No. ESH96/2, University of Leicester, 1996.Google Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy W.“A Failed Institutional Transplant: Raiffeisen's Credit Cooperatives in Ireland, 1894–1914.” Explorations in Economic History 31, no. 1 (1994): 38–61.Google Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy W.“Trust: A Concept Too Many.” Working Paper No. 907, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, 2005.Google Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy W.“New Law for New Enterprises: The Development of Cooperative Law in Germany, 1867–1889.” Mimeo, Yale University, July 2010.Google Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy W., Harris, Ron, Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. “Putting the Corporation in Its Place.” Enterprise and Society 8, no. 3 (2007): 687–729.Google Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy W., and Martinez-Rodriguez, Susana. “Did the Cooperative Start Life as a Joint Stock Company?” Working Paper No. 987, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, 2010.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry. The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: TheBelknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Ingrid. “Avoiding Lock-In: Cooperative Creameries in Denmark, 1882–1903.” European Review of Economic History 3, no. 1 (1999): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, Ingrid, and Hviid, Morten. “Diffusion of New Technology and Complementary Bets Practice: A Case Study.” European Review of Economic History 9, no. 3 (2005): 365–97.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Ingrid, Lampe, Markus, and Sharp, Paul. “The Role of Technology and Institutions for Growth: Danish Creameries in the Late Nineteenth Century.” European Review of Economic History 15, no. 3 (2011): 475–93.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Ingrid, and O'Rourke, Kevin H.. “Incentives, Technology, and the Shift to Year-Round Dairying in Late-Nineteenth-Century Denmark.” Economic History Review 58, no. 3 (2005): 520–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, Samuel. “Butter Making in Denmark,” A paper read before the Norfolk Chamber of Agriculture at Norwich Saturday January 5th 1889. The Norfolk Chronicle Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Hørlyck, Erik. Dansk andelsret. 3.udg. København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2000.Google Scholar
Hviid, Morten. “Incentive Payments in Danish Cooperative Dairies.” In Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, edited by Kalmik, Pamuk and Klinedienst, Mark, Vol. 9, 149–76. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2006.Google Scholar
Johansen, Hans Chr. Dansk historisk statistik, 1814–1980. København: Gyldendal, 1985.Google Scholar
Keillor, Steven. Cooperative Commonwealth, Co-Ops in Rural Minnesota, 1859–1939. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P.“Group Behavior and International Trade.” Journal of Political Economy 59, no. 1 (1951): 30–46.Google Scholar
Kyed, Johannes. Enkelte statistiske Oplysninger vedrørende Mejeribruget. Odense: Kontoret for Mejeristatistik, 1910.Google Scholar
Lawless, Greg. “History of Cooperatives in Wisconsin.” University of Wisconsin. Center for Cooperatives. Bulletin No. 2, 2002.Google Scholar
Masten, Scott. “Contractual Choice.” In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Vol. III, edited by Boukart, Boujdewijn and de Geest, Gerrit, 25–45. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000.Google Scholar
Mælkeritidende 1901.Google Scholar
McCabe, David A.“The Recent Growth of Co-Operation in Ireland.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 20, no. 4 (1906): 547–74.Google Scholar
McLaughin, Eoin J. “Microfinance Institutions in Nineteenth-Century Ireland.” Ph.D. Thesis, National University of Ireland Maynooth, 2009.Google Scholar
Ó Gráda, Cormac. “The Beginning of the Irish Creamery System, 1880–1914.” Economic History Review 30, no. 2 (1977): 284–305.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin H. “Culture, Politics, and Innovation: Evidence from the Creameries.” Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 3235, London, 2002.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin H.“Culture, Conflict, and Cooperation: Irish Dairying Before the Great War.” Economic Journal 117, no. 523 (2007): 1357–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, M.C.Andelsmælkerivirksomheden i Vestjylland, 1884–85. Esbjerg: Syddansk Universitetsforlag, 1895 [1981 edition by Claus Bjørn].Google Scholar
Rashid, Salim. “Quality in Contestable Markets: A Historical Problem?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, no. 1 (1988): 245–49.Google Scholar
Rey, Patrick, and Tirole, Jean. “Loyalty and Investment in Cooperatives.” IDEI Working Paper 123, Institut d’Économie Industrielle, Toulouse, 2000.Google Scholar
Rommes, Ronald. “The Rise of Agricultural Cooperatives in the Netherlands.” Mimeo, Rural History, The University of Wageningen, 2008.Google Scholar
Statistiske Meddelelser 1911, 4. række 36. bind. København.Google Scholar
Statistiske Meddelelser 1914, 4. række, 40. bind. København.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E.“Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets.” The World Bank Economic Review 4, no. 3 (1990): 351–66.Google Scholar
Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen, 1895.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Handbook No. 138. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1958.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. “Cooperatives in the Dairy Industry.” Rural Development, Cooperative Information, Report 1, Section 16, Washington, DC: USGPO, 2005, available at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/pub/cir116.pdf.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “Transaction Cost Economics.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization I, edited by Schmalensee, Richard and Willig, Robert D., 135–82. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1989.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E.“Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works, Where It Is Headed.” De Economist 146, no. 1 (1998): 23–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E.“The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38, no. 3 (2000): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar