Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:44:31.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land Policy and Its Relation to Agricultural Production and Distribution, 1862 to 1933

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Theodore Saloutos
Theodore Saloutos
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

If by land policy we mean a comprehensive, well-thought-out plan that made for an efficient long-range use of our agricultural resources, we are reasonably safe in saying we had none. If we had anything that came close to resembling a policy, it was that of throwing open vast quantities of public and private lands to cultivation which resulted in maladjustments that made it difficult, if not impossible, for many farmers to adjust themselves to capitalistic methods of production and distribution. The extent of these maladjustments may be gauged in part by observing the status of agriculture on the eve of the New Deal. Shrinking foreign markets, world-wide competition, rising tariff walls, poor farm management practices, and excessive production and distribution costs were accompanied by sharp increases in indebtedness, farm foreclosures, and tenancy. Agriculture was receiving a dwindling share of the national income, capital formation was being discouraged, and farming had been relegated to a subordinate position within the economy.

Type
Land Policy after the Homestead Act
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 1962 , pp. 445 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gray, L. C., “The Causes: Traditional Attitudes and Institutions,” Soil and Men. Yearbook of Agriculture, 1938 (Washington: Govt. Printing Office, 1938), p. 111Google Scholar.

2 Gray, L. C., “Objectives in the Land Use Planning Programs of the United States Government,” Proceedings of the Western Farm Economics Association, Seventh Annual Meeting (Berkeley, 1934), p. 1Google Scholar.

3 Gates, Paul, “Recent Land Policies of the Federal Government,” National Resources Board, Land Planning Committee, Part VII (Washington: Govt. Printing Office, 1935), p. 60Google Scholar.

4 Gray, “Objectives in the Land Use Planning Programs,” p. 4.

5 Saloutos, Theodore, “The Spring Wheat Farmer in a Maturing Economy, 1870–1920,” The Journal of Economic History, VI, No. 2 (Nov. 1946), 173–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Ibid., pp. 176–77.

7 Ely, Richard T. and Wehrwein, George S., Land Economics (New York: Macmillan Co., 1940), pp. 172–73Google Scholar.

8 Gray, “Objectives in Land Use Planning Programs,” p. 4.

9 Ely and Wehrwein, Land Economics, pp. 172–73

10 Tostlebe, Alvin S., Capital in Agriculture: Its Formation and Financing Since 1870 (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1957), pp. 4–5, 11–14Google Scholar.

11 Veblen, Thorstein, Absentee Ownership (New York: B. W. Huebsch, 1923), p. 136Google Scholar.

12 Tostlebe, Capital in Agriculture, pp. 11–14.

13 lbid., pp. 19–20.

14 Ibid., pp. 46–47.

15 Ibid., pp. 20–21.

16 This is expressed in terms of 1910–1914 prices.

17 Tostlebe, Capital in Agriculture, pp. 22–23

18 Flanders, Ralph E., Platform for America (New York: Whittlesey House, 1936), pp. 8–10Google Scholar.

19 Hambidge, Gove, ldquo;The Meat in the Agricultural Stew,” Harper's, CLXXI (July 1935), 245Google Scholar.

20 Schwartz, Harry, “On the Wage Structure of Agriculture,” Political Science Quarterly, LVII, No. 3 (Sept. 1942), 413Google Scholar; see also, Englund, Eric, “The Dilemma of the Corn Belt,” World's Work, LIII (Nov. 1926), 46–47Google Scholar.

21 Saloutos, Theodore, “The American Farm Bureau Federation and Farm Policy: 1933–1945,” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, XXVIII, No. 4 (March 1948), 316Google Scholar; Hambidge, quo;The Meat in the Agricultural Stew,” p. 245.

22 “Agricultural Exports In Relation to Land Policy,” Supplementary Report of the Land Planning Committee to the National Resources Board, Part II (Washington: Govt. Printing Office, 1935). P. 6Google Scholar.

23 Farmers in a Changing World, Yearbook of American Agriculture (Washington: Govt. Printing Office, 1940), p. 571Google Scholar.

24 Coulter, J. L., “Agricultural Development in the United States, 1900–1910,” in Carver, T. N., ed., Readings in Rural Economics (Boston: Ginn & Co., 1916), p. 322Google Scholar; Nourse, Edwin G., “Agriculture,” in Recent Economic Changes in the United States, II (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1929), 553Google Scholar; Nourse, , American Agriculture and the European Market (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1924), p. 42Google Scholar.

25 Baker, O. E., “Land Utilization,” Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, IX (New York: Macmillan Co, 1937) 132–33Google Scholar.

26 Saloutos, Theodore and Hicks, John D., Agricultural Discontent in the Middle West, 1900–1939 (Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1951), pp. 128–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 554–56.

27 Leven, Maurice, Moulton, Harold G.,3 and Warburton, Clark, America's Capacity to Consume (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1934), pp. 19–21Google Scholar.

28 Strauss, Frederick and Bean, Louis H., Gross Farm Income and Indices of Farm Production and Prices in the United States, 1869–1937, U. S. Agriculture Dept., Technical Bulletin No. 703 (1940), p. 6Google Scholar.

29 Ibid.

30 Gray, “Objectives in the Land Use Planning Programs,” p. 4.

31 Saloutos and Hicks, Agricultural Discontent in the Middle West, pp. 128–30, 554–56; Hicks, John D., The Populist Revolt (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1931), pp. 427–44Google Scholar.

32 Baker, “Land Utilization,” Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, IX, 136. See also Duddy, Edward A., Conference on Economic Policy for American Agriculture (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1932)Google Scholar.

33 Schickele, Rainer, Agricultural Policy (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1954), pp. 364–67Google Scholar.