Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:33:03.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretations of the Industrial Revolution in England: A Methodological Inquiry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

R. M. Hartwell
R. M. Hartwell
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Perhaps the most important methodological problem in the writing of history is to discover why different historians, on the basis of the same or similar evidence, often have markedly different interpretations of a particular historical event. Why, for example, in a world in which there is almost unquestioned belief, even by Marxist historians, that industrialization is the grand remedy for the economic and social ills of poor and underdeveloped countries, do some historians, and especially the Marxists, still argue about the goods or ills bestowed on the worker by the first great experiment in industrialization, the industrial revolution in England? The expected economic dividend of modern industrialization is undoubtedly a higher standard of living, and the occasional opponents of such development base their opposition not on this indisputable material advance but on the “moral risk” involved in the transformation of life by industrialization.1The historians, however, while concerned also with this possible moral risk, are not all certain that the industrial revolution in England before 1850 did cause the average standard of living of the worker to rise. This uncertainty might be resolved by finding out what actually happened, but in the meantime interpretations differ, and have differed, on the basis of some evidence, of much confusion, and of differing value judgments. It is the specific aim of this article to give a history of the interpretations of the industrial revolution, and to explain them.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1959 , pp. 229 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Freyre, G., “Morals and Social Change,” Transactions of the Third World Congress of Sociology (8 vols.; London: International Sociological Association, 1956), I, 20–33Google Scholar.

2 Clapham, J. H., An Economic History of Modern Britain (3 vols.; Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1926), I, viiGoogle Scholar.

3 Webb, S., Labour in the Longest Reign (Fabian Tract No. 75; London: The Fabian Society, 1897), p. 2Google Scholar.

4 The Village Labourer, 1760-1832 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1911)Google Scholar; The Town Labourer, 1760-1832 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1917)Google Scholar; The Skilled Labourer, 1760-1832 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1919)Google Scholar; The Rise of Modern Industry (London: Methuen, 1925)Google Scholar; The Age of the Chartists (London: Longmans,. Green & Co., 1930)Google Scholar; The Bleak, Age (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1934)Google Scholar; and Lord Shaftesbury (London: Constable, 1923)Google Scholar. The popularity of these books can be judged from the number of reprints; thus, The Village Labourer was first published in 1911, reprinted in 1912, 1913, 1919, 1920, 1924, 1927, 1932, 1936, and 1948; The Town Labourer, which was first printed in 1917, had four new impressions by the end of 1920. Very few history books in the twentieth century have sold so well.

5 The Skilled Labourer, pp. 1 and 4; The Village Labourer (1948 Guild, ed.), II, 136–37Google Scholar. There is a significant difference between the early books and Tlie Bleak dge (published in 1934), which admitted that “historians have been apt to draw the life of this time in colours too sombre for the truth,” that the explanation of “systematic and widespread discontent…must be sought outside the sphere of strictly economic conditions,” and that “after the forties there was a slow and gradual improvement in the conditions and temper of social life.” (Pelican ed., pp. 15 and 226.) The change in attitude can be seen also in “The Industrial Revolution and Discontent,” The Economic History Review, II (01 1930), written in response to Clapham's claim that the standard of living improved between 1790 and 1830Google Scholar.

6 Toynbee, A., Lectures on the Industrial Revolution in England (London, 1884), p. 84Google Scholar.

7 Rogers, J. E. Thorold, Six Centuries of Work, and Wages (10th ed.; London: Swan Son-nenschein, 1909), pp. 485 and 492Google Scholar.

8 Cunningham, W., The Growth of Industry and Commerce in Modern Times (6th ed.; 3 vols.; Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1925), HI, 668 and 617Google Scholar.

9 Gibbins, H. de B., Industry in England: Historical Outlines (5th ed.; London: Methuen, 1907), p. 421Google Scholar.

10 Hamilton, E. J., “Prices as a Factor in Business Growth,” The Journal of Economic History, XII (Fall 1952), 344Google Scholar.

11 The Review of Economic Progress, IV (07 1952), 4Google Scholar.

12 Thus an Economic History of Modern Europe by Friedlander, H. E. and Oser, J. (New York: Prentice-Hall, 1953)Google Scholar describes labor conditions in England before 1870 almost entirely in terms of “social consequences,” quoting as authorities the Hammonds, the Webbs, the Coles, M. Beer, E. Lipson, W. Page, and G. Slater (p. 154 et seq.). See also Gregg, P.. A Social and Economic History of Britain, 1760-1950 (London: Harrap, 1952)Google Scholar and Bryant, A., The Age of Elegance, 1812-1822 (London: Collins, 1950)Google Scholar.

13 Ashton, T. S. in The Journal of Economic History, IX (1949), 38Google Scholar.

14 , Clapham, Economic History of Modern Britain, I, 561Google Scholar.

15 Bowley published in the Journal of the Statistical Society (1895, 1898, 1899, and 1902) and in The Economic Journal (1895, 1896); Wood's, G. H. researches were summarized in two articles, “The Course of Average Wages between 1790 and 1860,” The Economic Journal, IX (1899)Google Scholar and “Real Wages and the Standard of Comfort since 1850,” Journal of the Statistical Society, LXXII (1909)Google Scholar. Bowley's researches are summarized in Wages in the United Kingdom in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1900)Google Scholar and Wages and Income in the United Kingdom since 1860 (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1937)Google Scholar.

16 Daniels, G. W., The Early English Cotton Industry (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1920), pp. 145–46Google Scholar. Daniels went on to argue, pp. 147-48, that the distress of the period was caused by the Napoleonic Wars, which “distorted” economic development and “thwarted” social development

17 George Unwin and Others, Samuel Oldknow and the Arkfvrights (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1924), pp. 241–42Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., p. 561.

19 “Of Empty Economic Boxes,” The Economic Journal, XXXII (1922)Google Scholar.

20 Hutt, W. H., “The Factory System of the Early Nineteenth Century,” Economica, VI (1926), 93Google Scholar. Compare with Appendix VIII to Vol. VI of Tooke, T. and Newmarch, W., A History of Prices… 7792-7.856 (6 vols.; London, 1838-1857)Google Scholar, which shows the beneficial effects of the Factory Acts.

21 Gregory, T. E., An Introduction to Tooke and Newmarch's “A History of Prices and of the State of the Circulation from 1792 to 1856” (London: King, 1928), pp. 119–20Google Scholar.

22 Pinchbeck, iVy, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution (London: Routledge, 1930), p. 311Google Scholar.

23 George, D., England in Transition (London: Routledge, 1931; and Pelican edition, 1953), p. 144Google Scholar.

24 Redford, A., The Economic History of England, 1760-1860 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1931), p. 65Google Scholar.

25 Ashton, T. S., “The Standard of Life of the Workers in England, 1790-1830,” The Journal of Economic History, IX (Fall 1949)Google Scholar; “Some Statistics of the Industrial Revolution in Britain,” Manchester Statistical Society (01 14, 1948)Google Scholar.

26 See Hayek, F. A., Capitalism and the Historians (London: Routledge, 1954)Google Scholar, and Chaloner, W. H., The Hungry Forties (“Aids for Teachers Series,” No. 1; published by The Historical Association; London, 1957)Google Scholar.

27 See “The Moral History of U.S. Business,” and “What Historians Teach About Business,” Fortune, December 1949 and April 1952; also Woodruff, W., “History and the Businessman,” The Business History Review, XXX (1956)Google Scholar.

28 Hobsbawm, E. J., “The British Standard of Living, 1790-1850,” The Economic History Review, X (08 1957), 61Google Scholar.

29 Ibid., p. 46.

30 , Toynbee, The Industrial Revolution, p. 193Google Scholar.

31 Klingender, F. D., Art and the Industrial Revolution (London: Royle, 1947)Google Scholar, p. 71 et seq.

32 Ibid., p. 74; and The Excursion, Books VIII and IX.

33 Southey, T., Sir Thomas More: or Colloquies on the Progress and Prospects of Civilization (2 vols.; London, 1829), I, 197Google Scholar.

34 Coleridge, S. T., The Constitution of Church and State (London, 1829), pp. 66–67Google Scholar.

35 Fielden, J., The Curse of the Factory System (London, 1836)Google Scholar; Wing, C., The Evils of the Factory System Demonstrated by Parliamentary Evidence (London, 1837)Google Scholar; Kay, J. P., The Moral and Physical Condition of the Working Classes Employed in the Cotton Manufacture in Manchester (London, 1832)Google Scholar; Kydd, S., The History of the Factory Movement (London, 1857)Google Scholar; Thackrah, C. T., The Effects of Arts, Trades and Professions…on Health and Longevity (London, 1831)Google Scholar; for R. Oasder, see Driver, C., Tory Radical, the Life of Richard Oastler (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946)Google Scholar; Bray, J. F., Labour's Wrongs and Labour's Remedy (Leeds, 1839)Google Scholar; Thompson, W., An Enquiry into the Principles of the Distribution of Wealth Most Considerate to Human Happiness (London, 1850)Google Scholar; and Engels, F., The Condition of the Wording Class in England in 1844 (London, 1845)Google Scholar.

36 , Engels, The Condition of the Working Class (1950 ed.), p. 2Google Scholar. Engels book has had more influence on English interpretations of the industrial revolution than Marx's Capital, but there has never been an influential English Marxist historian of the industrial revolution. The traditional English denigrators have been Tory Radicals or Fabian Socialists, the first stimulated by opposition to Whig progress, the second by direct observation of English industrial conditions rather than by Continental theorizing. Nevertheless, Engels' book, which became a Socialist classic, was read by Toynbee, the Webbs, and the Hammonds, who consistendy overvalued it as history; but see the introduction to a new edition by W. O. Henderson and W. H. Chaloner (Oxford: Blackwell, 1958) which has a realistic reappraisal, and an unflattering one, of Engels as a historian.

37 Macaulay, T. B., “Southey's Colloquies,” Edinburgh Review (01 1930)Google Scholar; reprinted in all standard editions of Macaulay's essays, e.g., Longmans Popular edition (London, 1902), pp. 119–21Google Scholar.

38 Porter, G. R., The Progress of a Nation (London, 1847)Google Scholar and Tooke and Newmarch, A History of Prices.

39 Porter, ibid., p. 459; cf. , Tooke and , Newmarch, A History of Prices, II, 70–71Google Scholar. Porter excepted the “hand-loom weavers, and others following analogous employments, conducted in the dwellings of the workmen.”

40 Gaskell, P., The Manufacturing Population of England (London, 1833), p. 161Google Scholar; see also , Kay, The Moral and Physical Condition of the Working Classes, pp. 26–27Google Scholar. Both Gaskell and Kay argued for “moral decline.”

41 Greg, W. R., Essays on Political and Social Science (2 vols.; London, 1853), I, 321, 343Google Scholar.

42 Smiles, S., Workmen's Earnings, Strikes and Savings (London, 1861), pp. 12Google Scholar, 13, 17.

43 Ward, J., Workmen and Wages at Home and Abroad (London, 1868), p. 224Google Scholar. See also Nichols, G., A History of the English Poor Law (new edition by Willink, H. G.; 3 vols.; London: King, 1904), II, 46Google Scholar; Ludlow, J. M. and Jones, L., Progress of the Working Class, 1832-1867 (London, 1867), p. 297Google Scholar; Brassey, T., On Work and Wages (London, 1873), p. 126Google Scholar; , Levi, Wages and Earnings of the Working Classes (London, 1867), p. 128Google Scholar; Jeans, J. S., England's Supremacy (London, 1885), ch. 1Google Scholar.

44 Published as a threepenny pamphlet in 1884; later included in Economic Inquiries and Studies (2 vols.; London: Bell, 1904), I, 382–423Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., p. 28.

46 Eden, F. M., The State of the Poor (3 vols.; London, 1797), I, iiGoogle Scholar.

47 , Macaulay, “Southey's Colloquies,” p. 122Google Scholar.

48 J. L. and Hammond, B., The Town Labourer, p. viGoogle Scholar.

49 , Hutt, “The Factory System,” pp. 78–93Google Scholar.

50 Geyl, P., Use and Abuse of History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955), pp. 10 and 75Google Scholar.

51 See Ginsburg, M., The Idea of Progress (London: Methuen, 1953)Google Scholar.

52 See Butterfield, H., The Whig Interpretation of History (London: Bell, 1931), especially pp. 45–46Google Scholar.

53 Scatcherd, N., The History of Morley (Leeds, 1830), pp. 88–89Google Scholar.

54 The Economic Journal, IV (1894), 187Google Scholar, reviewing “Royal Commission on Labour. The Employment of Women” (London, 1893)Google Scholar; quoted by , Pinchbeck, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, p. 308Google Scholar.

55 Guest, R., A Compendious History of the Cotton Manufacture (Manchester, 1823), p. 37Google Scholar.

56 Parliamentary Papers, 1840, XXIII, 568Google Scholar; cf. Parliamentary Papers, 1834, X, 419Google Scholar, with J. Makin saying that “the writings of Carlyle and Taylor and other infidels are more read than the Bible, or any other Book.”

57 , Scatcherd, The History of Morley, p. 88Google Scholar.

58 Smith, W., The History and Antiquities of Morley (London, 1876), pp. 212–13Google Scholar.

59 Parliamentary Papers, 1833, XX, 32Google Scholar.

60 Parliamentary Papers, 1840, XXIII, 543Google Scholar.

61 , Guest, A Compendious History, p. 43Google Scholar.

62 Cf. Belloc, H., The Servile State (London: Foulis, 1912)Google Scholar.

63 Jones, G. T., Increasing Return (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1933), p. 1Google Scholar; Clark, C., The Conditions of Economic Progress (26. ed.; London: Macmillan, 1951), p. 16Google Scholar.

64 Ashton, T. S., “The Standard of Life of the Workers in England, 1790-1830,” The Journal of Economic History, IX (1949), 33Google Scholar.

65 George, D., London Life in the Eighteenth Century (London: Kegan Paul, 1925), p. viiiGoogle Scholar.

66 Thus, for example, Lionel Trilling says of Zola that he gives the reader “the strange pleasure we habitually derive from the indictment of human kind.” Observer, Aug. 18, 1957.

67 , Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation, p. iGoogle Scholar.

68 Quoted by George, D., England in Transition, p. 210Google Scholar. Compare Thornton's, W. T.statement in Over-Population and Its Remedy (London, 1846), p. 10:Google Scholar “The labouring population has…been spoken of as if it formed only one class, but it is really divided into several, among which the rates of remuneration are far from being uniform;

…so that, in order to represent with perfect fidelity the state of the labouring population, it would be necessary to describe each class separately.”

69 The writers who thought that the working classes were “progressing” between 1800 and 1850 nevertheless excepted the hand-loom weavers; thus Porter, McCulloch, and Ure.

70 The Bleak. Age, ch. v.

71 Gilboy, E. W., Wages in Eighteenth Century England (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1934)Google Scholar.

72 Redford, A., Labour Migration in England, 1800-50 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1926)Google Scholar.

73 , Pinchbeck, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, p. 308Google Scholar.

74 , Eden, The State of the Poor, I, 404Google Scholar.

75 Atkins, Ruth, “Report on the Webb Local Government Collection in the London School of Economics and Political Science” (unpublished, in Miss Atkins possession, University of Technology, Sydney)Google Scholar.

76 Colquhoun, P., A Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis (London, 1796), p. 33Google Scholar.

77 See in particular D. George, London Life in the Eighteenth Century, for numerous references to Place; also, Atkins“Report.” It would seem that the Webbs were somewhat inconsistent on this point.

78 This indicates, perhaps, a latent controversy to stimulate future Hammonds and Claphams.