Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:41:46.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance Institutions and Landholding Inequality in Nineteenth-Century Germany: Evidence from Hesse-Cassel Villages and Towns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2021

Simone A. Wegge Open the ORCID record for Simone A. Wegge [Opens in a new window]
Simone A. Wegge*
Affiliation:
Professor, College of Staten Island – CUNY, Department of Economics, Lucille and Jay Chazanoff School of Business, 2800 Victory Blvd., Staten Island, NY 10314 and Member of the Faculty, The Graduate Center – CUNY. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the German principality of Hesse-Cassel in the 1850s, comparing inheritance institutions and landholding inequality for roughly a thousand mostly agricultural villages and towns. The principality lay between impartible northern Europe and the partible southwest. Inequality in landholding size is measured, showing an average Gini of 0.615 and substantial variation across communities. Places with relatively larger populations and ones that practiced impartible inheritance had mostly higher wealth inequality. The main result is that inheritance norms played a role in causing higher landholding inequality. Higher emigration rates in the impartible communities helped to alleviate landholding inequality.

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 909 - 942
Copyright
© The Economic History Association 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to thoughtful guidance from JEH editor Dan Bogart and former editor William Collins, both of whom made this a much better paper. Similar thanks go to former editor Ann Carlos and two anonymous referees. I also extend my deep gratitude to my colleague Kristin Mammen who made substantive editorial suggestions that also improved this paper. Participants in the economics workshop at SUNY-Binghamton in October 2020 contributed very helpful suggestions in the final stages. Discussions with Guido Alfani over time inspired me to persist with this work. Thanks also go to Nora Santiago for creating the GIS maps and to Leon L. Wegge for assisting with translations of works by Joseph Goy. I also thank Alex Klein, Joel Mokyr, Anne Pfaelzer de Ortiz, and my CUNY colleagues Hyoung Suk Shim, George Vachadze, Wim Vijverberg, and Bryan Weber for suggestions on the paper at various stages. Participants of the 2015 Economic History Association (EHA) meetings made helpful comments on an earlier draft. The presentation of this research at the 2015 EHA conference was supported by a travel grant from the Faculty Center for Professional Development at the College of Staten Island.

References

REFERENCES

Alfani, Guido. “Wealth Inequalities and Population Dynamics in Early Modern Northern Italy.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 40, no. 4 (2010): 513–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfani, Guido. “Economic Inequality in Northwestern Italy: A Long-Term View (Fourteenth to Eighteenth Centuries).” Journal of Economic History 75, no. 4 (2015): 1058–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfani, Guido, and Francesco, Ammannati. “Long Term Trends in Economic Inequality, c. 1300–1800: The Case of the Florentine State.” Economic History Review 70, no. 4 (2017): 1072–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfani, Guido, Gierok, Victoria, and Schaff, Felix. “Economic Inequality in Preindustrial Germany, ca. 1300–1850.”Forthcoming, this Journal.Google Scholar
Alvaredo, Facundo, Atkinson, Anthony B., Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. “The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, no. 3 (2013): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Inge. Hessische Auswanderer (HESAUS) Index nach Familiennamen, Nr. 12, Vol. 2. Marburg/Lahn, Germany: Archivschule Marburg, Institut für Archivwissenschaft, 1987–1988.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Inge. Auswanderung aus Kurhessen: nach Osten oder Westen? Marburg, Germany: Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg, 1993.Google Scholar
Baum-Snow, Nathaniel, and Ronni, Pavan. “Inequality and City Size.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95, no. 5 (2013): 1535–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrens, Kristian, and Frederic, Robert-Nicoud. “Survival of the Fittest in Cities: Urbanisation and Inequality.” Economic Journal 124, no. 581 (2014): 1371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, Ernst. “Population Change and the Economy.” In Germany. A New Social and Economic History 1630–1800 . Vol. II, edited by Ogilvie, Sheilagh, 39–62. London/New York: Arnold, 1996.Google Scholar
Berkner, Lutz K. “Inheritance, Land Tenure and Peasant Family Structure: A German Regional Comparison.” In Family and Inheritance. Rural Society in Western Europe 1200–1800, edited by Goody, Jack, Thirsk, Joan, and Thompson, E.P., 71–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Berkner, Lutz, and Franklin, Mendels. “Inheritance Systems, Family Structure and Demographic Patterns in Western Europe, 1700–1900.” In Historical Studies of Changing Fertility, edited by Tilly, Charles, 209–24. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Blinder, Alan. “Model of Inherited Wealth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, no. 4 (1973): 608–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovensiepen, R. Die Kurhessische Gewerbepolitik und die wirtschaftliche Lage des zünftigen Handwerks in Kurhessen von 1816–1867. Marburg, Germany: Elwert, 1909.Google Scholar
Brophy, James M. “The End of the Economic Old Order: The Great Transition, 17501860.” In Oxford Handbook of Modern German History, edited by Helmut Walser Smith, 169–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Casari, Marco, and Maurizio, Lisciandra. “Gender Discrimination in Property Rights: Six Centuries of Commons Governance in the Alps.” Journal of Economic History 76, no. 2 (2016): 559–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, C.Y. Cyrus. “Primogeniture.” Journal of Political Economy 99, no. 1 (1991): 78–99.Google Scholar
Crafts, N.F.R. “Patterns of Development in Nineteenth Century Europe.” Oxford Economic Papers 36, no. 3 (1984): 438–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, James B. “Wealth and Economic Inequality.” In Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, edited by Salverda, Wiemer, Nolan, Brian, and Timothy, M. Smeeding, 127–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Davies, James B., Susanna, Sandström, Anthony, Shorrocks, and Edward, Wolff. “The Level and Distribution of Global Household Wealth.” Economic Journal 121 (2011): 223–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumke, Rolf. “Income Inequality and Industrialization in Germany, 1850–1913.” Research in Economic History, 11 (1988): 1–47.Google Scholar
Eddie, Scott. “The Distribution of Landed Properties by Value and Area: A Methodological Essay Based on Prussian Data, 1886–1913.” Journal of Income Distribution, 3 (1993): 101–40.Google Scholar
Eddie, Scott. Landownership in Eastern Germany before the Great War. A Quantitative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, George Thomas. “Studies in the Rural History of Upper Hesse, 1650–1830.” Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University, 1976.Google Scholar
Fox, Thomas. “Land Tenure, Feudalism, and the State in Eighteenth-Century Hesse.” In Themes in Rural History of the Western World, edited by Herr, Richard, 99–139. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Franz, Günther. Der Dreißigjährige Krieg und das Deutsche Volk. Untersuchungen zur Bevölkerungs-und Agrargeschichte. Stuttgart: G. Fischer, 1961.Google Scholar
Germany, State of Hesse. Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg (HStAM). Marburg, Germany. Bestand H3 (Community survey).Google Scholar
Germany, State of Hesse. Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg (HStAM). Marburg, Germany. Bestand 16 (Ministerium des Inneren).Google Scholar
Goy, Joseph. “Pour une cartographie des modes de transmission successorale deux siècles après le Code civil.” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome. Moyen Âge, temps modernes 100 (1988): 431–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goy, Joseph. “A propos du système de la coutume: problématiques en evolution.” In L’histoire grande ouverte, hommages à Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, edited by Burguière, André, Goy, Joseph, Ladurie, Emmanuel Le Roy, and Tits-Dieuaide, Marie-Jeanne. Paris: Fayard, 1997.Google Scholar
Hatton, Timothy J., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. The Age of Mass Migration: Causes and Economic Impact. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Herlihy, David. “The Distribution of Wealth in a Renaissance Community: Florence 1427.” In Towns in Societies. Essays in Economic History and Historical Sociology, edited by Abrams, Philip and Wrigley, E. A., 131–57. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hessen-Kassel. Kurfürstlich Hessisches Hof-und Staatshandbuch. Kassel, Germany: Waisenhaus, 1843, 1860. Available at http://opacplus.bsb-muenchen.de/title/514509-0.Google Scholar
Kopczuk, Wojciech. “What Do We Know about the Evolution of Top Wealth Shares in the United States?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29, no. 1 (2015): 4766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukowski, Martin. Pauperismus in Kurhessen. Ein Beitrag zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der Massenarmut in Deutschland 1815–1855. Marburg, Germany: Hessische Historische Kommission Darmstadt & Historische Kommission für Hessen, 1995.Google Scholar
Landau, Georg. Beschreibung des Kurfürstenthums Hessen. Kassel, Germany: Theodor Fischer, 1842.Google Scholar
Landwirtschaftliche Zeitschrift für Kurhessen. Kassel, Germany: Kurfürstliche Commission für landwirtschaftliche Angelegenheiten, 1865.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H. “Three Centuries of Inequality in Britain and America.” In Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 1, edited by Anthony, B. Atkinson and Bourguignon, François, 167–216. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, Peter H., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. American Inequality. A Macroeconomic History. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H., and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. American Growth and Inequality since 1700 . Unequal Gains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Mayhew, Alan. Rural Settlement and Farming in Germany. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko, Lindert, Peter H., and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Pre-industrial Inequality.” Economic Journal 121 (2011): 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, Esteban A., and Palencia, Fernando Ramos. “Decomposing Income Inequality in a Backward Pre-Industrial Economy: Old Castile (Spain) in the Middle of the Eighteenth Century.” Economic History Review 69, no. 3 (2016): 747–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noback, Christian, and Noback, Friedrich E. . Münz-, Mass-und Gewichtsbuch: das Geld-, Maass-und Wechselwesen, die Kurse, Staaspapiere, Banken, Handlesanstlaten und Usanzen aller Staaten und wichtigern Orte. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus, 1858.Google Scholar
Ohles, Frederik. Germany’s Rude Awakening. Censorship in the Land of the Brothers Grimm. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Osmond, Jonathan. “Land, Peasant, and Lord in German Agriculture since 1800.” In Germany. A New Social and Economic History, Vol. III, edited by Ogilvie, Sheilagh and Overy, Richard, 71–105. London: Arnold, 2003.Google Scholar
Pedlow, Gregory W. The Survival of the Hessian Nobility 1770–1870. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Gottfried. “The Quality of Peasant Living in Central Europe.” In Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, edited by William, L. Thomas, Jr., with the collaboration of Carl O. Sauer, Marston Bates, and Lewis Mumford, 240–77. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piketty, Thomas, Postel-Vinay, Gilles, and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. “Wealth Concentration in a Developing Economy: Paris and France, 1807–1994.” American Economic Review 96, no. 1 (2006): 236–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prados, de la Escosura, Leandro. “Inequality, Poverty, and the Kuznets Curve in Spain, 1850–2000.” European Review of Economic History 12, no. 3 (2008): 287–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, Frederic L. “Simulation of the Impact of Social and Economic Institutions on the Size Distribution of Income and Wealth.” American Economic Review 63, no. 1 (1973): 50–72.Google Scholar
Roine, Jesper, and Daniel, Waldenström. “Long Run Trends in the Distribution of Income and Wealth.” In Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 2A, edited by Anthony, B. Atkinson and Bourguignon, François, 469–592. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2015.Google Scholar
Ryckbosch, Wouter. “Economic Inequality and Growth before the Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Low Countries (Fourteenth to Nineteenth centuries).” European Review of Economic History 20, no. 1 (2016): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabean, David W. Kinship in Neckarhausen, 1700–1870. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sakai, Eihachiro. Der kurhessiche Bauer im 19. Jahrhundert und die Grundlastenablösung. Melsungen, Germany: A. Bernecker, 1967.Google Scholar
Scheffer, Marten, van Bavel, Bas, van de Leemput, Ingrid A., and van Nes, Egbert H.. “Inequality in Nature and Society.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 50 (2017): 13154–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, Tom. “Economic Landscapes.” In Germany. A New Social and Economic History 1450–1630, Vol. I, edited by Scribner, Bob, 1–31. London: Arnold, 1996.Google Scholar
Shammas, Carole. “A New Look at Long-Term Trends in Wealth Inequality in the United States.” American Historical Review 98, no. 2 (1993): 412–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieglerschmidt, Jörn. “Social and Economic Landscapes.” In Germany. A New Social and Economic History, Vol. II, edited by Ogilvie, Sheilagh, 1–38. London: Arnold, 1996.Google Scholar
Sperber, Jonathan. “The Atlantic Revolutions in the German Lands, 1776–1849.” Oxford Handbook of Modern German History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H., and Carolyn Moehling. “Rising Inequality: Trends in the Distribution of Wealth in Industrializing New England.” Journal of Economic History 61, no. 1 (2001): 160–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. “Distribution of Income and Wealth among Individuals.” Econometrica 37, no. 3 (1969): 382–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutch, Richard. “The One Percent across Two Centuries: A Replication of Thomas Piketty’s Data on the Concentration of Wealth in the United States.” Social Science History 41, no. 4 (2017): 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theibault, John. German Villages in Crisis. Rural Life in Hesse-Kassel and the Thirty Years’ War, 1580–1720. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1995.Google Scholar
van Bavel, Bas. “Looking for the Islands of Equality in a Sea of Inequality. Why Did Some Societies in Pre-Industrial Europe Have Relatively Low Levels of Wealth Inequality?” In Economic Inequality in Pre-Industrial Societies: Causes and Effects. Datini Studies in Economic History, edited by Nigro, Giampiero, 431–36. Firenze: Firenze University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
van Zanden, Jan Luiten. “Tracing the Beginning of the Kuznets Curve: Western Europe during the Early Modern Period.” Economic History Review 48, no. 4 (1995): 643–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vits, Brigitta. Die Wirtsschafts-und Sozialstruktur ländlicher Siedlungen in Nordhessen vom 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Marburg/Lahn, Germany: Selbstverlag der Marburger Geographischen Gesellschaft, 1993.Google Scholar
Walker, Mack. German Home Towns. Community, State and General Estate, 1648–1817. New York: Cornell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Wandschneider, Kirsten. “Landschaften as Credit Purveyors: The Example of East Prussia.” Journal of Economic History 75, no. 3 (2015): 791–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegge, Simone A. “Chain Migration and Information Networks: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Hesse-Cassel.” Journal of Economic History 58, no. 4 (1998): 957–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegge, Simone A. “To Part or Not to Part: Emigration and Inheritance Institutions in Nineteenth-Century Hesse-Cassel.” Explorations in Economic History 36, no. 1 (1999): 30–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegge, Simone A. “Occupational Self-Selection of Nineteenth-Century German Emigrants: Evidence from the Principality of Hesse-Cassel.” European Review of Economic History 6, no. 3 (2002): 365–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, Eberhard. “Ergebnisse eines Vergleichs der grundherrschaftlichen Strukturen Deutchlands und Frankreichs vom 13. Bis zum Ausgang des. 18. Jahrhunderts.” Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial-und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 57, no. 1 (1970): 1–14.Google Scholar
Wodon, Quentin, and Shlomo, Yitzhaki. “The Effect of Using Grouped Data on the Estimation of the Gini Income Elasticity.” Economics Letters 78, no. 2 (2003): 153–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunder, Heide. “Agriculture and Agrarian Society.” In Germany. A New Social and Economic History, Vol. II, edited by Ogilvie, Sheilagh, 63–99. London: Arnold, 1996.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Wegge supplementary material

Online Appendix
Download Wegge supplementary material(File)
File 43.9 KB