Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:58:07.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immigration, Exclusion, and Taxation: Anti-Chinese Legislation in Gold Rush California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2005

MARK KANAZAWA
MARK KANAZAWA
Affiliation:
Mark Kanazawa is Professor, Department of Economics, Carleton College, 1 North College Street, Northfield, MN 55057. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Historical scholarship on the politics of nineteenth-century Chinese immigration emphasizes the interests of labor and management in the genesis of congressional legislation in 1882 that limited Chinese immigration into the United States. This article examines early state attempts at the exclusion of Chinese workers after the first major wave of Chinese immigration during the California Gold Rush. Opposition to exclusion occurred in California in the early 1850s because Chinese immigrants were important taxpayers when both the state and localities were experiencing major fiscal difficulties. State attempts to legislate exclusion were successful only after financial conditions improved in the late 1850s.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 779 - 805
Copyright
© 2005 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auerbach Alan, J., and Philip Oreopoulos. May 1999 “Analyzing the Fiscal Impact of U.S. Immigration.” American Economic Review 89 176– 80.Google Scholar
Bancroft Hubert H. 1888. History of California, Vol. VI, San Francisco: The History Company,
Brown Martin, and Peter Philips. October 1986 “Competition, Racism, and Hiring Practices among California Manufacturers, 1860–1882.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40 61– 74.Google Scholar
California. Laws. Statutes of California. San Jose: Winchester, 1850– 1853.
California. Laws. 1855. Statutes of California, San Francisco: Fitch & Geiger,
California. Laws. 1858. Statutes of California, San Francisco: O'Meara,
California. Legislature. 1850, Journal of the Senate, 1st session. Appendix S: Report of Green on Mines and Foreign Miners. San Jose: Winchester, pp. 493– 97.
California. Legislature. 1851. Journal of the Assembly, 2nd session. Eugene Casserly, State Printer,
California. Legislature. 1851, Journal of the Senate, 2nd session. Appendix E. No. 2: Treasurer's Report on Foreign Miner's Tax Law. Eugene Casserly, State Printer, pp. 591– 98.
California. Legislature. 1852. Journal of the Assembly, 3rd session, San Francisco: Fitch & Geiger, State Printers,
California. Legislature. 1852. Journal of the Proceedings of the Senate, 3rd Session, Appendix. San Francisco: Fitch & Geiger, State Printers,
California. Legislature. 1852, Report of Committee on the Governor's Special Message in relation to Asiatic Emigration. Journal of the Proceedings of the Senate, 3rd Session. Appendix. San Francisco: Fitch & Geiger, State Printers, pp. 731– 37.
California. Legislature. 1852, Report of the Committee on Mines and Mining Interests. Journal of the Proceedings of the Senate, 3rd Session. Appendix. San Francisco: Fitch & Geiger, State Printers, pp. 829–35.
California. Legislature. 1853. Journal of the Assembly, 4th session, San Francisco: Kerr, State Printer,
California. Legislature. 1853, Majority and Minority Reports of the Committee on Mines and Mining Interests, Document No. 28. Journal of the Assembly, 4th Session. San Francisco: Kerr, State Printer, pp. 3– 21.
California. Legislature. 1855, Reports of the Select Committee to who was referred Assembly Bills No. 206, 207 & 208 with Reference to Foreign Miners, Document No. 19. Journal of the Assembly, 6th Session. San Francisco: Redding, State Printer, pp. 5– 13.
California. Legislature. 1855, Minority Report of the Select Committee on Resolutions of Miner's Convention of Shasta County. Document No. 16. Journal of the Senate, 6th Session. San Francisco: Redding, State Printer, pp. 3– 7.
California. Legislature. 1855, Report of Mr. Flint, of the Select Committee to whom was referred the resolutions of Resolutions of Miner's Convention of Shasta County. Document No. 19. Journal of the Senate, 6th Session. San Francisco: Redding, State Printer, pp. 3– 6.
California. Legislature. 1856. Journal of the Senate, 7th session. Appendix: Report of the Controller of the State. San Francisco: Allen, State Printer,
California. Legislature. 1856, Report of Committee on Mines and Mining Interests, Document No. X. Journal of the Assembly, 7th Session. San Francisco: Allen, State Printer, pp. 3– 16.
California. Legislature. 1861. Journal of the Senate, 12th session, Sacramento: Botts, State Printer,
California. Legislature. Annual Report of the Comptroller of the State of California, various years.
Caughey John W. 1940. California. New York,
Chan Sucheng. 2000. “A People of Exceptional Character: Ethnic Diversity, Nativism, and Racism in the California Gold Rush.” In Rooted in Barbarous Soil: People, Culture, and Community in Gold Rush California, edited by Kevin Starr and Richard J. Orsi, 44–85. Berkeley: University of California Press,
Chan Sucheng. 1986. This Bittersweet Soil: The Chinese in California Agriculture, 1860–1910, Berkeley: University of California Press,
Chiu Ping. 1967. Chinese Labor in California, 1850–1880, Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin,
Clay Karen, and Gavin Wright. “Order Without Law? Property Rights During the California Gold Rush.” Explorations in Economic History forthcoming.
Cloud Patricia, and David W. Galenson. 1987 “Chinese Immigration and Contract Labor in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Explorations in Economic History 24, no. 1 22– 42.Google Scholar
Cloud Patricia, and David W. Galenson. 1991 “Chinese Immigration: Reply to Charles McClain.” Explorations in Economic History 28, no. 2 239– 47.Google Scholar
Cornford Daniel. 1999. “‘We all live more like brutes than humans’: Labor and Capital in the Gold Rush.” In A Golden State: Mining and Economic Development in Gold Rush California, edited by James J. Rawls and Richard J. Orsi, 78– 104. Berkeley: University of California Press,
Cross Ira B. 1935. A History of the Labor Movement in California, Berkeley: University of California Press,
Daily Alta Californian, various issues.
Daniels Roger. 1988. Asian America: Chinese and Japanese in the United States since 1850, Seattle: University of Washington Press,
Ellison William H. 1950. A Self-Governing Dominion: California, 1849–1860, Berkeley: University of California Press,
Friedberg Rachel M., and Jennifer Hunt. 1995 “The Impact of Immigrants on Host Country Wages, Employment, and Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 Spring: 23– 44.Google Scholar
Greenland Powell. 2001. Hydraulic Mining in California: A Tarnished Legacy, Spokane, WA: Clark,
Heckendorn and Wilson. 1856. Miners & Businessmen's Directory, Columbia: Clipper Office,
1882. History of Tuolumne County. San Francisco, Alley,
Mann Ralph. 1982. After the Gold Rush: Society in Grass Valley and Nevada City, California, 1849–1870, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
Margo Robert A. June 1997. “Wages in California During the Gold Rush.” NBER Working Paper Series on Historical Factors in Long Run Growth, Historical Paper 101,
Marks Paula Mitchell. 1994. Precious Dust: The American Gold Rush Era, 1848–1900, New York: Morrow,
May Philip Ross. 1970. Origins of Hydraulic Mining in California, Oakland: Holmes,
McClain Charles J. 1994. In Search of Equality: The Chinese Struggle Against Discrimination in Nineteenth-Century America, Berkeley: University of California Press,
McClain Charles J. 1990 “Chinese Immigration: A Comment on Cloud and Galenson.” Explorations in Economic History 27, no. 3 363– 78.Google Scholar
Morefield Richard H. 1971. The Mexican Adaptation in American California, 1846–1875, San Francisco: R&E Research Associates,
Paul Rodman. 1947. California Gold: The Beginnings of Mining in the Far West, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press,
Petersen Richard H. 1976 “The Foreign Miners' Tax of 1850 and Mexicans in California: Exploitation or Expulsion?” Pacific Historian 20 Fall: 265– 70.Google Scholar
Rohrbough Malcolm J. 1997. Days of Gold: The California Gold Rush and the American Nation, Berkeley: University of California Press,
Saxton Alexander. 1971. The Indispensable Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California, Berkeley: University of California Press,
Shinn Charles H. 1948. Mining Camps: A Study in American Frontier Government, New York: Knopf,
Storesletten Kjetil. April 2000 “Sustaining Fiscal Policy Through Immigration.” Journal of Political Economy 108 300– 23.Google Scholar
Takaki Ronald. 1998. Strangers from a Different Shore: A History of Asian Americans. (rev.) Boston: Little, Brown,
Umbeck John R. 1981. A Theory of Property Rights with Application to the California Gold Rush, Ames: Iowa State University Press,
U.S. Department of Interior. Census Office. 1854. Statistical View of the United States: Compendium, Washington, DC: GPO,
U.S. Department of Interior. Census Office. 1865. Manufactures of the United States in 1860, Washington, DC: GPO,
U.S. Department of Interior. Census Office. 1864. Population of the United States in 1860, Washington, DC: GPO,
U.S. Department of Interior. Census Office. 1885. The United States Mining Laws and Regulations Thereunder, and State and Territorial Mining Laws, to which are Appended Local Mining Rules and Regulations, Washington, DC: GPO,
Wallis John Joseph, Richard E. Sylla, and John B. Legler. 1994. “The Interaction of Taxation and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Banking.” In The Regulated Economy, edited by Claudia Goldin and Gary D. Libecap, 121– 44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
Williams Stephen. 1930. “The Chinese in the California Mines, 1848–1860.” MA Thesis, University of California, Berkeley,
Zerbe Richard O., and C. Leigh Anderson. 2001 “Culture and Fairness in the Development of Institutions in the California Gold Fields.” This JOURNAL 61, no. 1 114– 43.Google Scholar