Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:49:08.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Much Trade Liberalization Was There in the World Before and After Cobden-Chevalier?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

ANTONIO TENA-JUNGUITO ,
MARKUS LAMPE  and
FELIPE TÂMEGA FERNANDES
ANTONIO TENA-JUNGUITO*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economic History and Instituto Figuerola, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, c/ Madrid, 126, Building 7, E-28902 Getafe, Madrid. E-mail: [email protected].
MARKUS LAMPE*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economic History and Instituto Figuerola, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, c/ Madrid, 126, Building 7, E-28902 Getafe, Madrid. E-mail: [email protected].
FELIPE TÂMEGA FERNANDES*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Economics Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rua Marquês de São Vicente, 225, sala 210F, Gávea 22451-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and Banco Modal, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Cobden-Chevalier Treaty of 1860 is regarded as central turning point in nineteenth-century trade policy, inaugurating a free trade era in Western Europe. We reexamine this story and put it into global perspective with a new database covering more than 7,500 data points for 11 categories of manufactures in 41 countries and colonies around the world between 1846 and 1880. It reveals that bilateralism after 1860 reinforced a process already underway before. Nevertheless, we highlight that trade liberalization was a global phenomenon over most of our period, so that the prominent British case appears as typical rather than exceptional.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , 22 August 2012 , pp. 708 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Accominotti, Olivier and Flandreau, Marc. “Bilateral Trade Treaties and the Most-Favored-Nation Clause: The Myth of Trade Liberalization in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 60, no. 2 (2008): 147–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, James E., and Peter Neary, J.. “Welfare versus Market Access: The Implications of Tariff Structure for Tariff Reform.” Journal of International Economics 71, no. 1 (2007): 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angier, E. A. V.Fifty Years' Freights. London: Fairplay, 1920.Google Scholar
Bairoch, Paul.. Commerce exterieur et development économique de l'Europe au XIX siègle. Paris and The Hague: Mouton, 1976.Google Scholar
Bairoch, Paul.. “European Trade Policy, 1815-1914.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. 8: The Industrial Economies: The Development of Economic and Social Policies, edited by Mathias, Peter and Pollard, Sidney, 1–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bairoch, Paul.. Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Beghin, John C., and Yue, Chengyan. “The Tariff Equivalent and Forgone Trade Effects of Prohibitive Technical Barriers to Trade.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91, no. 4 (2009): 930–41.Google Scholar
Bertola, Luis and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Globalization in Latin America Before 1940.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Latin America. Vol. 2: The Long Twentieth Century, edited by Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, Coatsworth, John, and Cortés Conde, Roberto, 11–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Board of Trade. Import Duties on British Goods (Foreign Countries). Return of the Estimated Average Ad Valorem Rate of Import Duty Levied in the Principal European Countries, and in the United States, on Certain Articles of British Produce or Manufacture. Parliamentary Papers 1877, (291).Google Scholar
Board of Trade. Rates of Duty (Foreign and Colonial) on British Manufactures or Produce. Return of the Rates of Duty in English Money Levied on Certain Articles of British Produce or Manufacture Imported into the Principal European Countries, the Turkish Empire, Egypt, Tunis, Morocco, Persia, the United States, Brazil, the Argentine Confederation, and the Principal Colonies, in Each of the Years 1860-61, 1870, 1875, and 1880. Parliamentary Papers 1881 (333).Google Scholar
Board of Trade. The Comparative Incidence of Foreign and Colonial Import Tariffs on the Principal Classes of Manufactures Exported from the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Papers 1903, Cd 1761, part XVI.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucy M.The Board of Trade and the Free Trade Movement, 1830-1842. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor.. The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, Miguel Angel. “Blood and Debt: War and Taxation in Nineteenth-Century Latin America.” The American Journal of Sociology 102, no. 6 (1997): 1565–1605.Google Scholar
Clemens, Michael A., and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Why Were Latin America Tariffs So Much Higher Than Asia's Before 1950?” Revista de Historia Económica. Journal of Iberian and Latin America Economic History 30, no. 1 (2012): 12–39.Google Scholar
Cockton, Peter.. Subject Catalogue of the House of Commons Parliamentary Papers, 1801-1900. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey, 1988.Google Scholar
Cruz Barney, Óscar. El comercio exterior de México, 1821-1928. Sistemas arancelarios y disposiciones aduanales. México DF: Universidad Autónoma de México, 2005.Google Scholar
Sergio, De la Cuadra F.. “Antecedentes históricos de la política arancelaria chilena 1810-1930.” Estudios Públicos 18 (otoño 1985): 1–7.Google Scholar
Denzel, Markus.. Handbook of World Exchange Rates, 1590-1914. Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Federico, Giovanni.. “The Corn Laws in Continental Perspective.” European Review of Economic History 16, no. 2 (2012): 166–87.Google Scholar
Federico, Giovanni and Tena-Junguito, Antonio. “Was Italy a Protectionist Country?” European Review of Economic History 2, no. 1 (1998): 73–97.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc.. The Glitter of Gold: France, Bimetallism, and the Emergence of the International Gold Standard, 1848-1873. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Giffen, Robert.. “The Use of Import and Export Statistics.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 45, no. 2 (1882): 181–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “The Antebellum Tariff: Different Products or Competing Sources? A Comment on Irwin and Temin.” The Journal of Economic History 61, no. 3 (2001): 799–805.Google Scholar
Hübner, Otto. Die Zolltarife aller Länder: Gesammelt, übersetzt, geordnet. Leipzig: Heinrich Hübner, 1852.Google Scholar
Hübner, Otto. Die Zolltarife aller Länder. Gesammelt, übersetzt, geordnet, Zweite Auflage. Iserlohn: Baedeker, 1866.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. “Free Trade and Protection in Nineteenth-Century Britain and France Revisited: A Comment on Nye.” The Journal of Economic History 53, no. 1 (1993a): 146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A.. “Multilateral and Bilateral Trade Policies in the World Trading System: An Historical Perspective.” In New Dimensions in Regional Integration, edited by de Melo, Jaime and Panagariya, Arvind, 90–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A., and Temin, Peter. “The Antebellum Tariff on Cotton Textiles Revisited.” The Journal of Economic History 61, no 3 (2001): 777–98.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H.The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. Second edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kee, Hiau Looi, Nicita, Alessandro, and Olarreaga, Marcelo. “Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices.” Economic Journal 119, no. 534 (2009): 172–99.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. “The Rise of Free Trade in Western Europe, 1820-1875.” The Journal of Economic History 35, no. 1 (1975): 20–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuntz Ficker, Sandra. El comercio exterior de México en la era del capitalismo liberal, 1870-1929. México, DF: El Colegio de México, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, H. Reader. The French Treaty and the Tariff of 1860, with An Historical Sketch of the Past Commercial Legislation of France. London: Cassel, Petter, and Galpin, 1861.Google Scholar
Lampe, Markus.. “Bilateral Trade Flows in Europe, 1857-1875: A New Dataset.” Research in Economic History 26 (2008): 81–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, Markus.. “Effects of Bilateralism and the MFN Clause on International Trade: Evidence for the Cobden-Chevalier Network, 1860-1875.” The Journal of Economic History 69, no. 4 (2009): 1012–1040.Google Scholar
Lampe, Markus.. “Explaining Nineteenth-Century Bilateralism: Economic and Political Determinants of the Cobden-Chevalier Network.” Economic History Review 64, no. 2 (2011): 644–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, Markus and Sharp, Paul. “Something Rational in the State of Denmark? The Case of an Outsider in the Cobden-Chevalier Network, 1860-1875.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 59, no. 1 (2011): 128–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, Muriel.. Contrabando en Colombia en el siglo XIX: Prácticas y discursos de resistencia y reproducción. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Historia, CESO, Ediciones Uniandes, 2008.Google Scholar
Lazer, David A. “The Free Trade Epidemic of the 1860s and Other Outbreaks of Economic Discrimination.” World Politics 51, no. 4 (1999): 447–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
League of Nations. Tariff Levels Indices, Geneva: League of Nations, 1927.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Sibylle H., and O'Rourke, Kevin H. “The Structure of Protection and Growth in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93, no. 2 (2011): 617–31.Google Scholar
Liepmann, Heinrich.. Tariff Levels and the Economic Unity of Europe: An Examination of Tariff Policy, Export Movements and the Economic Integration of Europe, 1913-1931. London: Allen & Unwin, 1938.Google Scholar
Llorca-Jaña, Manuel.. “To Be Waterproof or to Be Soaked: Importance of Packing in British Textile Exports to Distant Markets, The Cases of Chile and the River Plate, c.1810-1959.” Revista de Historia Económica/Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History 29, no. 1 (2011): 11–37.Google Scholar
López-Córdova, J. Ernesto, and Meissner, Christopher M.. “Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era.” American Economic Review 93, no. 1 (2003): 344–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, John.. Commercial Statistics: A Digest of the Productive Resources, Commercial Legislation, Customs Tariffs, of All Nations. Second edition. 5 vols. London: Whittaker and Co., 1850.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus.. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective/Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD, 2006.Google Scholar
Morrison, James Ashley. “Before Hegemony: Adam Smith, American Independence, and the Origins of the First Era of Globalization.” International Organization, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Nunn, Nathan and Trefler, Daniel. “The Structure of Tariffs and Long-Term Growth.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2, no. 4 (2010): 158–94.Google Scholar
Nye, John V.C. “The Myth of Free Trade Britain and Fortress France: Tariffs and Trade in the Nineteenth Century.” The Journal of Economic History 51, no. 1 (1991): 23–46.Google Scholar
Nye, John V.C.War, Wine, and Taxes. The Political Economy of Anglo-French Trade, 1689-1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick K. “Intercontinental Trade and the Development of the Third World since the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of World History 8, no. 1 (1997): 76–102.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. Globalization and History. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Pahre, Robert.. Politics and Trade Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century: The “Agreeable Customs” of 1815-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Polli-Schönborn, Marco.. “Zölle.” In Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz, http://www.hls-dhs-dss.ch/textes/d/D13765.php, 2006 (last accessed 29 February 2012).Google Scholar
de la Escosura, Leandro Prados. “El comercio hispano-británico en los siglos XVIII y XIX. I. Reconstrucción.” Revista de Historia Económica 2 (1984): 113–162.Google Scholar
Preußisches, Handels-Archiv. Wochenschrift für Handel, Gewerbe und Verkehrsanstalten (until 1855: Handels-Archiv; Berlin: Decker, 1847-1880).Google Scholar
Salvucci, Richard J.Textiles and Capitalism in Mexico: An Economic History of the Obrajes, 1539-1840. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Lars G.Lancashire in Decline: A Study in Entrepreneurship, Technology, and International Trade. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Sauerbeck, Augustus.. “Prices of Commodities and the Precious Metals.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 49, no. 3 (1886): 581–648.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl.. From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Schularick, Moritz and Solomou, Solomos. “Tariffs and Economic Growth in the First Era of Globalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 16, no. 1 (2011): 33–70.Google Scholar
Sharp, Paul.. “1846 and All That: The Rise and Fall of British Wheat Protection in the Nineteenth Century.” Agricultural History Review 58, no. 1 (2010): 76–94.Google Scholar
Stevens, Robert White. On the Stowage of Ships and Their Cargoes. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, & Dyer, 1878.Google Scholar
Tena-Junguito, Antonio.. “Assessing the Protectionist Intensity of Tariffs in Nineteenth-Century European Trade Policy.” In Classical Trade Protectionism, 1815-1914, edited by Dormois, Jean-Pierre and Lains, Pedro, 99–120. London and New York: Routledge (Explorations in Economic History), 2006.Google Scholar
Tena-Junguito, Antonio.. “Bairoch Revisited: Tariff Structure and Growth in the late Nineteenth Century.” European Review of Economic History 14, no. 1 (2010): 111–43.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. “The Impact of the Corn Laws Just Prior to Repeal.” Explorations in Economic History 27, no. 2 (1990): 123–56.Google Scholar
Yates, P. Lamartine. Forty Years of Foreign Trade: A Statistical Handbook with Special Reference to Primary Products and Underdeveloped Countries. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

TENA-JUNGUITO et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download TENA-JUNGUITO et al. supplementary material(File)
File 63.5 KB