Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:40:46.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The German Elections in the 1870s: Why Germany Turned from Liberalism to Protectionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

Sibylle H. Lehmann
Sibylle H. Lehmann*
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, MPI Gemeinschaftsgüter, Kurt-Schuhmacher-Str. 10, Bonn 53113, Germany. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1878 the liberal parties lost enough votes to lose the majority in the parliament which they had defended in the general election just one year before. In this article, the questions of where the voters came from and why the voting changed so crucially within one year are reexamined. The analysis uses a new set of data and makes use of King's algorithm, a tool provided by modern political science. The main finding of this article is that the change towards protectionism was not caused by new, but by floating voters from the agricultural sector.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 146 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adolph, Christopher, King, Gary, Herron, Michael C., and Schott, Kenneth W. “A Consensus on Second-Stage Analyses in Ecological Inference Models.” Political Analysis 11, no. 1(2003): 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Margaret L. “Voters: Junker, Landrat, Priest: The Old Authorities and the New Franchise in Imperial Germany.” The American Historical Review 98, no. 5(1993): 1448–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, Kenneth D. “The Second Founding of the Reich.” German Studies Review 10 no. 2(1987): 219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, Giannetti, Daniela, and Laver, Michael “Voters Strategies with Restricted Choice Menus.” British Journal of Political Science 36, no. 3(2001): 459–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, King, GaryEzI: A(n Easy) Program for Ecological Inference Computer software for MS-DOS, OS/2, and Windows 95. Development language: Gauss 2003Google Scholar
Böhme, HelmutProbleme der Reichsgründungszeit 1848–1879 Cologne, Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1968Google Scholar
Böhme, HelmutDeutschlands Weg zur Großmacht: Studien zum Verhältnis von Wirtschaft und Staat während der Reichsgründungszeit 1848–1881 Cologne, Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1972Google Scholar
Borchardt, KnutProtektionismus im historischen Rückblick. In Der neue Protektionismus, edited by Gutowski, Armin17–47Hamburg: Verlag Weltarchiv, 1984.Google Scholar
Brawley, Michael R. “Factoral or Sectoral Conflict? Partially Mobile Factors and the Politics of Trade in Imperial Germany.” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 4(1997): 633–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, DanieleElections in Western Europe since 1815: The Societies of Europe New York: Grove, 2000Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob, Cohen, PatriciaApplied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.Google Scholar
Dovring, Folke “The Transformation of European Agriculture.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, VI, pt. 11: The Industrial Revolution and after, edited by Habakkuk, H. J. and Michael, Postan604–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Evans, Ellen L.The German Center Party, 1870–1933: A Study in Political Catholicism Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1981Google Scholar
Feree, Karen “Iterative Approaches to R x C Ecological Inference Problems: Where They Can Go Wrong and One Quick Fix.” Political Analysis 12, no. 2(2004): 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, David A., Klein, S., Ostland, M., and Roberts, M. R.. “Review of a Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem by Gary King.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, no. 444(1998): 1518–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, David A. “Response to King's Comment.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, no. 445(1999): 355–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, AlexanderBread and Democracy in Germany Berkeley: University of California Press, 1943Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. A. “International Trade, Domestic Coalitions, and Liberty: Comparative Responses to the Crisis of 1873–1896.” In Historical Foundations of Globalization, edited by Foreman-Peck, James703–35Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 1977. Reprint, 1998.Google Scholar
Grant, OliverMigration and Inequality in Germany, 1870–1913 Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Michael C., and Shotts, Kenneth W. “Logical Inconsistency in EI-Based Second-Stage Regressions.” American Journal of Political Science 49 no. 1(2004): 690–706.Google Scholar
Hohls, Rüdiger “Der Wandel der regionalen Disparitäten in der Erwerbsstruktur Deutschlands 1895–1970.” In Regionen im historischen Vergleich: Studien zu Deutschland im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Bergmann, Jürgen288–413Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
Huber, Ernst R.Dokumente zur deutschen Verfassungsgeschichte Vol. 2: Deutsche Verfassungsdokumente 1851–1900 Cologne, Mainz: Kohlhammer, 1986Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas “The Political Economy of Free Trade: Voting in the British General Election of 1906.” Journal of Law and Economics 37, no. 1(1994): 75–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Statistik des Deutschen Reiches, Vol 4. Berlin, 1872.Google Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Statistik des Deutschen Reiches. “Berufstatistik nach der Allgemeinen Berufszählung vom 5. Juni 1882, part 2 and 3.” new series 2. Berlin, 1884.Google Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Statistik des Deutschen Reiches, Vol 32. Berlin, 1888.Google Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Statistik des Deutschen Reiches. “Berufs- und Gewerbezählung vom 14. Juni 1895. Die Landwirthschaft im Deutschen Reich.” new series 112. Berlin, 1898.Google Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Statistisches Jahrbuch für das Deutsche Reich, Vol 7. Berlin, 1886.Google Scholar
King, GaryA Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997Google Scholar
King, Gary, Rosen, Ori, Tanner, Martin, and Wagner, Alexander F. “Ordinary Economic Voting Behavior in the Extraordinary Election of Adolf Hitler.” This Journal 68, no. 4 (2008): 951–96.Google Scholar
Klug, Adam “Why Chamberlain Failed and Bismarck Succeeded: The Political Economy of Trade Tariffs in British and German Elections.” European Review of Economic History 5, no. 2(2001): 219–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Sibylle“The German Elections in the 1870s: Why Germany Turned from Liberalism to Protectionism.” Issue 2009/34. Bonn:: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, Anna M., and Rodrick, Dani “Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protective Than Others?” European Economic Review 49 no. 6(2005): 1393–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, Marc J. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocation and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71, no. 6(2003): 1695–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nipperdey, ThomasDeutsche Geschichte 1866–1918, vol. 2. Machtstaat der Demokratie. München: Beck, 1992; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogburn, W. F., and Goltra, I. “How Women Vote: A Study of an Election in Portland, Oregon.” Political Science Quarterly 34 no. 3(1919):413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oncken, HermanRudolf von Bennigsen: Ein deutscher liberaler Politiker. Nach seinen Briefen und hinterlassenen Papieren Stuttgart, Leipzig: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1910Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Sinnotts, Richard “The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence.” Brookings Trade Forum (2001): 157–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pflanze, OttoBismarck and the Development of Germany: The Period of Consolidation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puhle, Hans-Jürgen “Lords and Peasant in the Kaiserreich.” In Peasants and Lords in Modern Germany, edited by Moeller, Robert, 81–109. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1981.Google Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard A., and Niehuss, MerithWahlgeschichtliches Arbeitsbuch: Materialien zur Statistik des Kaiserreichs 1871–1918 Munich: Beck, 1980Google Scholar
Rogowski, RonaldCommerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989Google Scholar
Rosen, Ori, Jiang, Wenxin, King, Gary and Tanner, Martin A. “Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Ecological Inference: the R x C case.” Statistica Neerlandica 55, no. 1(2001): 134–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl “Parties and Interests in the ‘Marriage of Iron and Rye’.” British Journal of Political Science 28 no. 2(1998): 291–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, WilhelmHandbuch der sozialdemokratischen Parteitage von 1863 bis 1909 Munich: G. Birk & Co., 1910Google Scholar
Sheehan, James J. “Klasse und Partei im Kaiserreich: Einige Gedanken zur Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Politik.” In Innenpolitische Probleme des Bismarck-Reiches. edited by Pflanze, Otto1–24. Munich, Vienna: Oldenbourg, 1983.Google Scholar
Steinbach, PeterDie Zähmung des politischen Massenmarktes: Wahlen und Wahlkämpfe im Bismarckreich im Spiegel der Hauptstadt- und Gesinnungspresse. Passau: Rothe, 1990.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter “The Golden Age of European Growth reconsidered.” European Review of Economic History 6, no. 1(2002): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zanden, Jan L. “The First Green Revolution: The Growth of Production and Productivity in European Agriculture. 1870–1914.” The Economic History Review 44, no. 2(1991): 215–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Steven B. “Tariffs, Cartels, Technology, and Growth in the German Steel Industry, 1879 to 1914.” This Journal 40 no. 2(1980):309–30.Google Scholar
Webb, Steven B. “Agricultural Protection in Wilhelminian Germany: Forging an Empire with Pork and Rye.” This Journal 42 no. 2(1982) 309–26.Google Scholar
Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. “Das Deutsche Kaiserreich 1871–1918.” In Deutsche Geschichte, Vol. 3: 19. und 20. Jahrhundert 1815–1945, edited by Schulz, Gerhard, 203–404Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973 and 1985.Google Scholar
Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 3: Von der deutschen “Doppelrevolution” bis zum Beginn des Ersten Weltkrieges 1849–1914. Munich: Beck 1995.Google Scholar