Article contents
French Colonialism, Imported Technology, and the Handicraft Textile Industry in the Western Sudan, 1898–1918
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2009
Abstract
European technology, both practical and managerial arts, had an impact on the well-established cotton and handicraft textile industries of the Western Sudan during the first twenty-five years of colonial rule. But French efforts to shape cotton production for export did not always have the intended results. Indigenous historical processes as well as French colonial policy account for the changes in these industries.
- Type
- Papers Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1987
References
He wishes to thank the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Pew Foundation for support during the collection of data, and Pat Manning and Judy Brown for their detailed comments on an earlier draft of this article.Google Scholar
1 Porter, Glenn, “Management,” in Williams, Trevor, ed., A History of Technology, (Oxford, 1978), vol. 6, part I, p. 77;Google ScholarMerrill, Robert, “The Study of Technology,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 576–77.Google Scholar
2 “ Rapport sur l' Association Cotonnière Coloniale, Campaign 1912–1913,” file 1913, Archives Nationales, République du Mali (hereinafter ANM) 1 R 118.Google Scholar
3 (Cotton broker) Fossat, letter to Commandant of Bamako, 17 January 1899, Bamako ANM 1 R 81; “Note sur le coton,” 28 April 1897, Segu, ANM 1 R 116; “Rapport commercial et agricole,” 4th Quarter 1902, Segu, ANM 1 R 69; (agronomist) Vuillet, “L'agriculture du pays de Segou,” Renseignements Coloniaux, 1920.Google Scholar
4 Roberts, Richard, “Linkages and Multiplier Effects in the Ecologically Specialized Trade of Precolonial West Africa,” Cahiers d' Etudes Africaines, 20 (1980–1981), pp. 135–48;CrossRefGoogle ScholarRoberts, Richard, Warriors, Merchants, and Slaves: The State and the Economy in the Middle Niger Valley, 1700–1914 (Stanford, 1987).Google Scholar
5 Household production straddled two superimposed economies: an economy of subsistence and an economy of commodity production. The boundaries between these two economies were never clear. Even in the “subsistence” economies of Africa, surpluses were normal rather than exceptional, but they were stored rather than sold. For a general introduction to African exchange systems, see Gray, Richard and Birmingham, David, eds., Precolonial African Trade: Essays on Trade in Central and Eastern Africa before 1900 (London, 1970);Google Scholar and Meillassoux, Claude, ed., The Development of Indigenous Trade and Markets in West Africa (London, 1971).Google Scholar
6 Roberts, Richard, “Women's Work and Women's Property: Household Social Relations in the Maraka Textile Industry of the Nineteenth Century,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26 (04 1984), pp. 229–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Mias, P. Georges, letter to Colonel [commandant supérieur], 6 April 1893, Kayes, Archives Nationales, République de la France, Section Outre-Mer (hereinafter ANF-SOM) Soudan XIII la.Google Scholar
8 Raffenel, Anne, Nouveau Voyage au pays des Nègres (Paris, 1856), vol. 1, p. 407. For the 1897 description, see “Note sur le coton,” 28 04 1897, Segu, ANM R 116.Google Scholar
9 Raffenel, , Nouveau Voyage, vol. 1, p. 385;Google ScholarRoberts, Richard, “Long Distance Trade and Production: Sinsani in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of African History, 21 (1980), pp. 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 For general discussions linking slavery to political economy in Africa, see especially Lovejoy, Paul, Transformation in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa (Cambridge, 1983), chaps. 8, 9, 12;Google ScholarMiers, Suzanne and Kopytoff, Igor, eds., Slavery in Africa: Historical and Anthropological Perspectives (Madison, 1977);Google Scholar and Manning, Patrick, “The Contours of Slavery and Social Change in Africa,” American Historical Review, 88 (1983), pp. 835–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Lt.-Gov. Louis de Trentinian, letter to Commandant, cercle of Bamako, 11 August 1899, Kayes, ANM B 77. In 1903 the ACC estimated that the freight rates, which did not favor cotton, would be 112 francs per metric ton from the field to France (22 francs for movement along river to Koulikoro; 45 francs rail freight from Koulikoro to Kayes; 45 francs freight from Kayes to France). This rate was still higher than transport costs from the American South: cotton shipped from Galveston to France cost 105.5 francs per ton; from New Orleans, 88.3 francs per ton; and from Savanna, 72.25 francs per ton. Nautilus, “Le Soudan et la question cotonnière,” Bulletin ACC, annex 1, 1903, p. 44;Google Scholar Rapport de Maigret, M., secretary-general of the ACC, Bulletin ACC, 3, 1904, p. 56.Google Scholar
12 The relationship between the ACC and the colonial state was fraught with tensions over the terms of their agreements and the amount of the state's contributions. After 1927 the metropolitan state placed a surcharge of 1 franc per 100 kilograms of raw cotton imported into France and funneled most of this capital into ACC activities. See Robert, Louis, La Culture du Coton en Afrique Occidentale Française (Paris, 1931), pp. vii–ix.Google Scholar
13 Ponty, William, “Note sur la Colonie du Haut-Sénégal-Niger,” 25 June 1905, Paris, ANF-SOM Soudan Iii bis.Google Scholar
14 Charnet, Captain, “Rapport commercial et agricole,” 2nd Quarter 1899, Bamako, ANM I R 31.Google Scholar
15 Commandant adjoint, “Notice accompagnant 400kg coton destiné à un essai d'égrenage,” 20 December 1903, Segu, ANM I R 95; Governor William Ponty, letter to ACC, 22 January 1906, Kayes, Bulletin ACC, 8, March 1906.Google Scholar
16 “Rapport commercial,” 3rd Quarter 1911, Segu, ANM 1 Q 83; “Rapport sur l'emploi des subventions accordées … l' Association Cotonnière Coloniale,” [n.d., probably 1912], ANM I R 118.Google Scholar
17 President of the ACC, Esnault-Peletier, letter to governor of Haut-Sénégal-Niger, 23 November 1907, Paris, ANM I R 118.Google Scholar
18 Allocution de Esnault-Peletier, Meeting of ACC, 21 March 1906, Bulletin ACC, 8, 1906.Google Scholar
19 Carrié and Dabrigeon [Bamako merchants], letter to governor-general, 4 December 1912, Bamako, ANM I R 118; Gov.-Gen. William Ponty, letter to Minister of Colonies, 27 February 1913, ANM 1 R 118.Google Scholar
20 Gov.-Gen. Marie-François Clozel, circular to lieutenant governors [in Afrique Occidentale Française], 12 December 1912, Dakar, ANM I R 118.Google Scholar
21 Gov.-Gen. Gabriel Angoulvant, letter to Minister of Colonies, 13 June 1918, Dakar, Archives Nationales République du Sénégal 1 R 18.Google Scholar
22 Governor of Haut-Sénégal-Niger, letter to governor-general of the AOF, 12 August 1918, Bamako, ANF-SOM Union Coloniale Française 467.Google Scholar
23 Roberts, Richard, “The End of Slavery in the Western Sudan, 1897–1914,” in Miers, Suzanne and Roberts, Richard, eds., The End of Slavery in Africa (Madison, 1987).Google Scholar
24 “Rapport commercial,” 1st Quarter 1903, Bouguni; “Rapport commercial,” 3rd Quarter 1906, Bouguni, ANM 1 Q 47.Google Scholar
25 Quesnel, Marcel, “Rapport,” Bulletin ACC, 4, 1904, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
26 “ Discours d' Esnault-Peletier,” November 1907, Bulletin ACC, 1906–1907.Google Scholar
27 Commandant Collieaux, “Rapport sur le coton,” Koutiala, 25 Mar. 1910, ANM I R 113.Google Scholar
28 “Rapport commercial,” 1st Quarter 1908, Segu, ANM 1 Q 83.Google Scholar
29 ACC representative, letter to governor of Haut-Sénégal-Niger, 17 May 1905, ANM I R 81; “Rapport sur l'égrenage du coton récolté,” 1906, Segu, ANM I R 116.Google Scholar
30 Shea, Philip, “The Development of an Export Oriented Dyed Cloth Industry in the Kano Emirate” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1975);Google ScholarPitt, Carol, “An Economic and Social History of the Senegambia Textile Industry” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1978);Google ScholarJohnson, Marion, “Cotton Imperialism in West Africa,” African Affairs, 82 (1974), pp. 178–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by