Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:42:51.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domestic Trade and Market Size in Late-Eighteenth-Century France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Guillaume Daudin
Guillaume Daudin*
Affiliation:
Professeur des Universités in economics, Université Lille-I (EQUIPPE), Sciences Po (OFCE) Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, Cité Scientifique, Faculté d’Economie et de Sciences Sociales, Bâtiment SH2, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq cedex France. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article tests whether smaller domestic markets can explain why France industrialized more slowly than Britain. To do so, it uses the Tableauxdu Maximum. It begins by presenting this source and then checks if the data from the source are plausible using a logit theoretical gravity equation. The results of this gravity equation are then employed to compute the expected market size of specific supply centers. Even if differences in real, nominal, and disposable income are taken into account, some French supply centers had access to domestic markets that were larger than the whole of Britain.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 716 - 743
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, James E., and van Wincoop, Eric. “Trade Costs.” Journal of Economic Literature 42, no. 3 (2004): 691–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbellot, G., Lepetit, Bernard, and Bertrand, J.. Atlas de la Révolution Française, Routes et voies de communication t. 1. Edited by Bonin, Serge and Langlois, Claude. Paris: EHESS, 1987.Google Scholar
Arnould. De la balance du commerce et des relations commerciales extérieures de la France dans toutes les parties du globe particulièrement à la fin du règne de Louis XIV et au moment de la révolution. 3 vol., dont 1 de tableaux vols. Paris: Buisson, 1791.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, and Taglioni, Daria. “Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations.” NBER Working Paper No. 12516, Cambridge, MA, 2006.Google Scholar
Béaur, Gérard, and Minard, Philippe. Atlas de la Révolution Française, Èconomie t. 10. Edited by Bonin, Serge and Langlois, Claude. Paris: EHESS, 1997.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. B., and Jensen, J. B.. “Why Some Firms Export.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86, no. 2 (2004): 561–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Brian J. L.“Interdependency of Spatial Structure and Spatial Behavior: AGeneral Field Theory Formulation.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 21 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Freeman, L. C.. UCINET 6 Social Network Analysis Software v. 6.125. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Analytic Technologies, 2006.Google Scholar
Bosher, J. F.The Single Duty Project: A Study of the Movement for a French Custom Union in the Eighteenth Century. London: Athlone Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Bourgin, H., and Bourgin, G.. L'industrie sidérurgique en France au début de la Révolution. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1920.Google Scholar
Caron, P. Le Maximum général, instruction, recueil de textes et notes: Commission de recherche et de publication des documents relatifs à la vie économique sous la Révolution, 1930.Google Scholar
Carrière, Charles. Négociants marseillais au XVIIIe siècle. 2 vols. Marseille: Institut historique de Provence, 1973.Google Scholar
Conchon, Anne. Le péage en France au XVIIIe siècle: Les privilèges à l’épreue de la réforme. Paris: Comité pour l'histoire économique et financière de la France, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corvisier, Andrée. Précis d'histoire moderne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1971.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R.British Economic Growth During the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford Economic Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R.“Exogenous or Endogenous Growth? The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered.” The Journal of Economic History 55, no. 4 (1995): 745–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daudin, Guillaume. Commerce et prospérité: la France au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: PUPS, 2005.Google Scholar
Davis, Ralph. The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade. Leicester: Leicester University Press, Humanities Press Inc., 1979.Google Scholar
de Vries, Jan. The Industrious Revolution: Consumer Behavior and the Household Economy, 1650 to Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmet, Klaus, and Parente, Stephen. “Bigger is Better: Market Size, Demand Elasticity, and Resistance to Technology Adoption.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5825, 2006.Google Scholar
Dupâquier, Jacques. Histoire de la population française, III: De 1789 à 1974. Paris: PUF, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Frantz, Brian, and Taylor, Alan M.. “The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870–1939.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no. 2 (2003): 359–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etemad, Bouda. La Posession du monde: poids et mesure de la colonisation (XVIIIe–XXe). Bruxelles: Complexe, 2000.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon J., and Venables, Anthony J.. “Export Growth in Developing Countries: Market Entry and Bilateral Trade Flows.” Manuscript, 2002.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded. “From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N., 171–293. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.Google Scholar
Grantham, George W.“Jean Meuvret and the Subsistence Problem in Early Modern France.” The Journal of Economic History 49, no. 1 (1989): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grantham, George W.“Espaces privilégiés: Productivité agraire et zones d'approvisionnement des villes dans l’Europe préindustrielle.” Annales H.S.S., no. 3 (1997): 695–725.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT, 1991.Google Scholar
Harris, Chauncy D.“The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44, no. 4 (1954): 315–48.Google Scholar
Head, Keith, and Mayer, Thierry. “Illusory Border Effects: Distance Mismeasurment Inflates Estimates of Home Biais in Trade.” CEPII Working Paper No. 2002-1, 2002.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philip T.Growth in a Traditional Society: The French Countryside, 1450–1815. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Philip T., Jacks, David S., Levin, Patricia A., et al. “Real Inequality in Europe Since 1500.” The Journal of Economic History 62, no. 2 (2002): 322–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, Michael. “Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1993): 681–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Laboratoire de Démographie Historique/EHESS. BD–Cassini–EHESS (French census database), 2008.Google Scholar
Landes, David. The Unbounded Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. London: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Le Bouëdec, Gérard. “Intra-European Coastal Shipping from 1400 to 1900: A Long Forgotten Sector of Development.” In A Deus ex Machina Revisted: Atlantic Colonial Trade and European Economic Development, edited by Emmer, P. C., Pétré-Grenouilleau, O., and Roitman, J. V., 90–107. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Georges. Ètudes orléannaises. 2 vols. Vol. II : Subsistances et Maximum (1789-an IV), Mémoires et documents d'histoire de la Révolution française, 15. Paris: Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques (CTHS), 1963.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre. “La Réponse de l'industrie.” In Histoire économique et sociale de la France, edited by Braudel, F. and Labrousse, E., 217–66. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993 [1970]. Reprint.Google Scholar
Lepetit, Bernard. Les Villes dans la France moderne. Paris: Albin Michel, 1988.Google Scholar
Le Roux, Thomas. Le Commerce intérieur de la France à la fin du XVIIIe siècle: les contrastes économiques régionaux de l'espace français à travers les archives du Maximum, Jeunes Talents. Paris: Nathan, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesger, Cl. The Rise of the Amsterdam Market and Information Exchange: Merchants, Commercial Expansion, and Change in the Spatial Economy of the Low Countries, c. 1550–1630. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter, and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Revisiting England's Social Tables, 1688–1812.” Explorations in Economic History 19 (1982): 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus. Chinese Economic Performance in the Long Run. Paris: OECD, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus. The World Economy: A Millenial Perspective. Paris: OECD, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margairaz, Dominique. “Dénivellation des prix et inégalités de développement régional dans la France de 1790. Essai de cartographie.” Annales Historiques de la Révolution Française (avril-juin 1981): 262–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margairaz, Dominique. “Le Maximum, une grande illusion libérale ?” In Ètat, Finances et Èconomie pendant la Révolution, 399–427. Paris: Comité pour l'histoire économique et financière, Imprimerie nationale, 1991.Google Scholar
Margairaz, Dominique. “L'approvisionnement de Melun.” In Atlas de la Révolution française (10): Èconomie, edited by Béaur, Gérard, Minard, Philippe, and Laclau, Alexandra, 36. Paris: Editions de l’EHESS, 1997.Google Scholar
Mathias, Peter, and O’Brien, Patrick. “Taxation in Britain and France, 1715–1810: A Comparison of the Social and Economic Incidence of Taxes Collected for the Central Governments.” Journal of European Economic History 5, no. 3 (1976): 601–50.Google Scholar
Meuvret, Jean. Le Problème des subsistances à l’époque Louis XIV. 3: Le commerce des grains et la conjoncture. Vol. 2. Paris: Ècole des hautes études en sciecnes sociales, 1988.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko, Lindert, Peter, and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Measuring Ancient Inequality.” NBER Working Paper No. 13550, Cambridge, MA, 2007.Google Scholar
Mitchener, Kris James, and Weidenmier, Marc. “Trade and Empire.” Economic Journal 118, no. 533 (2008): 1805–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrisson, Christian, and Snyder, Wayne. “The Income Inequality of France in Historical Perspective.” European Review of Economic History 4 (2000): 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousnier, Roland. Les institutions de la France sous la monarchie absolue: 1598–1789. 2 vols. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1974.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin M., Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. “Income Distribution, Market Size, and Industrialization.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, no. 3 (1989): 537–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, Lawrence H.“The Annual Real and Nominal GDP for the United Kingdom, 1086–2005.” Economic History Services, 2006. Available at http://www.eh.net/hmit/ukgdp/.Google Scholar
Parker, William N.Europe, America, and the Wider World, Essays in the Economic History of Western Capitalism, America, and the Wider World. 2 vols. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Peaucelle, Jean-Louis. “Adam Smith's Use of Multiple References for His Pin Making Example.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13, no. 4 (2006): 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, Stephen, and Venables, Anthony J.. “Economic Geography and International Inequality.” Journal of International Economics 62, no. 1 (2004): 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rémond, André. Ètudes sur la circulations marchandes en France aux XVIIIe et XIXe siècles. T. 1: les prix des transports marchands de la Révolution au 1er Empire. Paris: M. Rivière, 1956.Google Scholar
Roehl, R. “French Industrialization: A Reconsideration.” Explorations in Economic History 13 (1976): 233–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul. “Endogenous Technological Change.” The Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5 (1990): S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London, 1776.Google Scholar
Szostak, Rick. The Role of Transportation in the Industrial Revolution: A Comparison of England and France. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toutain, Jean-Claude. “Le produit intérieur brut de la France, 1789–1990.” Histoire et société, histoire économiqu et quantitative, Cahiers de l’ISMEA 1, no. 11 (1997): 5–136.Google Scholar
Veverka, Jindrich. “The Growth of Governement Expenditure in the United Kingdom Since 1790.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, no. 10 (February 1963): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Nikolaus. “Path Dependent Border Effects: The Case of Poland's Reunificiation (1918–1939).” Explorations in Economic History 42 (2005): 414–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woronoff, Denis. L’Industrie sidérurgique en France pendant la Révolution et l’Empire. Paris: Presses de l’EHESS, 1984.Google Scholar
Yang, Xiaokai, and Ng, Siang. “Specialization and Division of Labour: A Survey.” In Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis, edited by Arrow, Kenneth J., Ng, Yew-Kwang, and Yang, Xiaokai, 3–63. London: Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweimüller, Josef. “Schumpeterian Entrepreneurs Meet Engel's Law: The Impact of Inequality on Innovation-Driven Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 5, no. 2 (2000): 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar