Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:27:35.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Mildred Campbell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 1955 , pp. 427 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The addition of the qualifying phrase “most of” (not in the script which I saw) modifies but does not invalidate my criticism.

2 Wool here is used to include both the wool trade and the cloth industry.