Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:39:03.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did They Jump or Were They Pushed? The Exit of Older Men from the London Labor Market, 1929–1931

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Dudley Baines  and
Paul Johnson
Dudley Baines
Affiliation:
Dudley Baines is Reader, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics, Houghton street, London WC2AE, England. Email: [email protected].
Paul Johnson
Affiliation:
Paul Johnson is Professor, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics, Houghton street, London WC2AE, England. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the income of older men in London around 1930, based on a large sample. The income of nonworking older men was substantially below that of men still working. We find no evidence that retirement rates increased at the state-penionable—unsurprisingly, since pension paryments provided less than a povertyline income. Less demanding or part-time work was unavailable. Hence we conclude that the decision of older manual workers to leave the labor market was determined primarily by the absence of appropriate employment opportunities, rather than the presence of substantial assets or nonlabor income.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 949 - 971
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baines, D. E., The Computerisation of the New Survey of London Life and Labour, 1929–1931. Working Papers in Economic History, LSE, 1999.Google Scholar
Beck, G. M.A Survey of British Employment and Unemployment, 1927–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 1951.Google Scholar
Beveridge Report, Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: HMSO, 1942.Google Scholar
Booth, C.Life and Labour of the People of London. 5 Volumes. Reprinted, New York: A. Kelley, 1969. (Originally published 1889–1891.)Google Scholar
Bulmer, M., Bales, K., and Sklar, K. K.. The Social Survey in Historycal Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Cohen, P.The British System of Social Insurance. London: Phillip Allen, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, C. “La naissance de la retraite moderne: l' Allemagne dans une comparison internationale (1850–1960).” Population 45, no. 3 (1990): 561–64.Google Scholar
J., Falkingham, and Hills, J., eds. The Dymanics of Welfare. The Welfare State and the Life Cycle. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
Feinstein, C., Statistical Tables of National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Gordon, C., “Familial Support for the Elderly in the Past: the Case of London's Working Class in the Early 1930s”, Ageing and Society 8, no. 3 (1988): 287–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, B., and Rotondo, F.. “Industrialization, the Family Economy, and the Economic Status of the Amercian Elderly”, Social Science History 15, no. 3 (Fall, 1991): 337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, M., and Goodman, A.. “A Home of One's Own: Aging and Home Ownership in the United States in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century”. In Aging in the Past, edited by Kertzer, D. and Laslett, P., 203–26. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hannah, L.Inventing Retirement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P.Saving and Spending. The Working Class Economy in Britain, 1870–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. “The Employment and Retirement of Older Men in England and Wales, 1881–1981”. Economic History Review 47, no. 1 (02 1994): 106–28.Google Scholar
D. C., Jones, ed. Social Survey of Merseyside. London: King and Co., 1934.Google Scholar
Linsley, C. A., and Linsley, C. L.. “Booth, Rowntree and Llwellyn Smith: A Reassessment of Interwar Poverty”. Economic History Reivew 46, no. 1 (02. 1993): 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn-Smith, H.New Survey of London Life and Labour. 9 volumes. London: King, 1930'1935.Google Scholar
Political and Economic Planning, The Exit from Industry. London: PEP, 1935Google Scholar
Richardson, H. W., and Aldcroft, D. A.. Building in the British Economy Between the Wars. London: Allen and Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar
Riley, J.Sickness, Recovery and Death. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Routh, G.Occupation and Pay in Great Britain, 1906 –1979. 2nd ed.London: Macmillan, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowntree, B. S.Poverty and Progress. A Second Social Survey of York London: Longman, 1941.Google Scholar
Sheppard, D.Growth and Role of UK Financial Institutions, 1880–1962. London: Methuen, 1971.Google Scholar
Stone and Cox Insurance Tables, 1931. 2nd ed. London: Stone and Cox, 1931.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. “Labour Market Structure and the Nature of Unemployment in Interwar Britain”. In Interwar Unemployment in International Perspective, edited by Eichengreen, B. and Hatton, T., 97–148. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Kingdom. Census of England and Wales, 1921.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Census of England and Wales, 1931.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Census of Production, 1930.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Census of Production, 1930 Part 5: General Report. London: HMSO, 1935.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. National Advisory Committee on the Employment of Older Men and Women, First Report. Cmd 8963. London: HMSO, 1953.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Registrar General's Decennial Supplement, England and Wales, Part IIa: Occupational Mortality. London: HMSO, 1938.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Statistical Abstractfor the United Kingdom, Cmd. 5903. London: HMSO, 1939.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Ministry of Labour Gazette. Monthly.Google Scholar