Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:01:01.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did Capitalism Lead to the Decline of the Peasantry? The Case of the French Combraille

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Anne C. Meyering
Anne C. Meyering
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of History at Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growth of French cities made possible the growth of population in the Combraille that lasted from about 1730 until about 1830. After 1830 the growth of cities and the rise of industrial capitalism explain the decline in population in the Combraille. Permanent out-migration accelerated. Temporary seasonal migration and the rate of natural increase declined. But the economic situation of the peasants in the Combraille improved. By 1950 the size of the population of the Combraille had returned to its pre-1730 level, but the majority of the inhabitants were much better off than they had been 200 years earlier.

Type
Papers Presented at the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, 3 vols. (New York, 1967), 1:745, 747.Google Scholar

2 See Vries, Jan de, “Patterns of Urbanization in Pre-Industrial Europe, 1500–1800,” in Patterns of European Urbanization since 1500, ed. Schmal, H. (London, 1981), pp. 77–110;,Google Scholarsee also Mols, Roger, Introduction à la Démographie historique des Villes d' Europe du XIVe au XVIIIe siècle, Recueil de Travaux d' Histoire et de Philologie de l' Université de Louvain, 4th ser., fasc. 2 (Louvain, 1955), vol. 2:Google ScholarLes Résultats, pp. 514–17.Google Scholar

3 See Weber, Adna, The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century (1899; reprint ed., Ithaca, New York, 1963);Google Scholarsee also Marczewski, J., “Take-off Hypothesis and the French Experience,” in The Economics of Take-Off into Sustained Growth, ed. Rostow, W. W. (New York, 1963), pp. 119–38;Google ScholarLevy-Leboyer, Maurice, “La Croissance économique en France au XIXe siècle. Résultats préliminaires,” Annales: Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 23 (07-08 1968), 788–807;CrossRefGoogle ScholarFrançois Crouzet, “Essai de Construction d'un Indice annuel de la Production industrielle française au XIXe siécle,” ibid., 25 (Jan.-Feb. 1970), 56–99.

4 For example, on the French iron and steel industry, see the studies of Gille, Bertrand, La Sidérurgie française au XIXe siècle (Geneva, 1968), especially chap. 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13.Google Scholar

5 André Fel believes that most peasants in the Massif Central, which includes the Combraille, continued to produce primarily for their own subsistence until 1920. See Fel, André, Les Hautes Terres du Massif Central: Tradition paysanne et Économie agricole, Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences humaines de Clermont-Ferrand, n.s., fasc. 3, Institut de Géographie, no. 23 (Paris, 1962), p. 190.Google Scholar

6 See Guerines, Guy de, “La Région nord-ouest du Puy-de-Dôme (dite Montagne de Riom),” in Les Populations rurales du Puy-de-Dōme, ed. Arbos, Philippe et al. , Mémoires de l' Académie des Sciences, Belles Lettres et Arts de Clermont-Ferrand, 33 (Clermont-Ferrand, 1933), pp. 103, 124–35;Google Scholarsee also Estienne, Pierre, “Les Populations de la Combraille,” Revue de Géographie de Lyon, 43 (1955), 757–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Corbin, Alain, Archaisme et Modernité en Limousin au XIXe siècle, 1845–1880, 2 vols. (Paris, 1975), 1:628.Google Scholar

7 See Estienne, “ Les Populations,” pp 761–65; Guerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” pp. 208–11;Google ScholarPerrein, R., “Les Mouvements de la Population en Auvergne, Bourbonnais et Velay,” Revue d' Auvergne, 63, nos. 3–4 (1949), 65–96;Google ScholarEstienne, Pierre, “Aspects démographiques actuels du Massif central,” Revue d' Auvergne, 73, nos. 1–2 (1959), 4–14.Google Scholar

8 See Estienne, Pierre, “Les Problèmes de Surpeuplement rural: L'Exemple de la Combraille,” Revue de Géographie alpine, 38 (1950), 306, 310;CrossRefGoogle ScholarDelaspre, Suzanne, “L'Émigration temporaire en Basse-Auvergne au XVIIIe siècle jusqu'à la Veille de la Revolution,” Revue d' Auvergne, 68, nos. 1–2 (1954), 51;Google ScholarPoitrineau, Abel, La Vie rurale en Basse-Auvergne au XVIIIe siècle (1726–1789), 2 vols., Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences humaines de l' Université de Clermont-Ferrand, 2nd ser., fasc. 23 (Paris, 1965), 1:570–1.Google Scholar

9 Rouchon, Charles, “L'Émigration: Étude,” Revue d' Auvergne, 63 (1949), 153–77;Google Scholarsee also Merlier, André, “Types d'Émigration limousine,” Revue de Géographie de Lyon, 10, nos. 3–4 (1934), Fig. 4, p. 238, on the canton of Crocq in the department of Creuse which lies just across the department border from Fernoël.Google Scholar

10 See Estienne, “Les Problèmes,” pp. 321–23; idem, “Les Populations,” p. 767; idem, “Aspects démographiques,” pp. 9–12; Guerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” pp. 177–80.Google Scholar

11 See Estienne, “Les Populations,” p. 773;Google Scholaron the part of the Combraille situated in the department of the Creuse, see Carron, Marie-Antoinette, “Prélude à l' Exode rural en France: Les Migrations anciennes des Travailleurs creusois,” Revue d' Histoire économique et sociale, 43, no. 3 (1965), 289–320;Google Scholarsee Corbin, , Archaisme, 1:195–204;Google ScholarDemangeon, Albert, “La Montagne dans le Limousin,” Annales de Géographie, 20 (07 1911), 331, n. 3;Google ScholarChâtelain, Abel, Les Migrants temporaires en France de 1800 à 1914, 2 vols. (Villeneuve-d' Ascq, 1976), 2:map 111–41;Google Scholarsee also Fel, Les Hautes Terres, p. 158; Merlier, “Types d'Émigration,” pp. 232–39; Rouchon, “L'Émigration,” passim; Estienne, “Les Problèmes,” pp. 311–13, 317–18, 326–34; idem, “Les Populations,” pp. 782–89; Guerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” pp. 111–12, 173–80;Google ScholarPoitrineau, Abel, “Aspects de L'Émigration temporaire et saisonnière en Auvergne à la fin du XVIIIe et au Début du XIXe siècle,” Revue d' Histoire moderne et contemporaine, 9 (1962), 17;Google ScholarClément, Henry, “Les Émigrants du Centre de la France,” La Réforme sociale, 10 (12 1, 1885), 482–83;Google Scholaridem, “ La Désertion des Campagnes en Pays limousin: Enquête monographique,” ibid., 58 (July-Dec. 1909), 215;Julliard, Marcel, “Les Émigrants dans les Montagnes d' Auvergne au XVIIIe siècle,” Bulletin historique et scientifique de l'Auvergne, 2nd ser. (1924), 120–21;Google ScholarChâtelain, Abel, “Les Migrations temporaires anciennes à Lyon et dans les pays environnants,” Études rhodaniennes [Revue de Géographie de Lyon], 24 (1949), 40, 43–45;Google Scholar

idem, “La Formation de la Population lyonnaise: L'Apport d'Origine montagnarde (XVIIIe-XIXe siècles),” ibid., 29 (1954), 94–99;Delaspre, Suzanne, “L'Émigration temporaire,” p. 2;Google ScholarCorbin, Alain, “Migrations temporaires et société rurale au XIXe siècle: Le Cas du Limousin,” Revue historique, 246 (10 1971), 295;Google ScholarRaison-Jourde, Françoise, La Colonie auvergnate de Paris au XIXe siècle, Recherches d'Histoire municipale contemporaine de la Commission des Travaux historiques de la Ville de Paris, no. 14 (Paris, 1976), pp. 59–74;Google ScholarChevalier, Louis, La Formation de la Population parisienne au XIXe siècle, Cahiers des Travaux et Documents de l'Institut national d'Études démographiques, no. 10 (Paris, 1950), pp. 171–236.Google Scholar

12 See Guerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” pp. 110–11, 119; Merlier, “Types d'Émigration,” pp. 217–18; Poitrineau, “Aspects de l'Émigration temporaire,” pp. 32–33; Corbin, “Migrations temporaires,” pp. 313–14, 316; Estienne, “Les Populations,” p. 783; Demangeon, “La Montagne,” p. 334; Fel, Les Hautes Terres, p. 157;Google ScholarClément, , “Les Émigrants,” La Réforme sociale, 11 (03 15, 1886), 286.Google Scholar

13 On depopulation, see Fel, Les Hautes Terres, pp. 167–92.Google Scholar

14 See Poitrineau, La Vie rurale, pp. 102–3, 156–57, 426–27; Corbin, Archaisme, pp. 241–42; Guerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” p. 170.Google Scholar

15 See ibid., pp. 156–47;Estienne, “Les Problèmes,” p. 317; idem, “Les Populations,” p. 778.Google Scholar

16 See Poitrineau, La Vie rurale, pp. 157, 163, 186–247, 426–34;Google Scholarsee also Rouchon, Charles, “Techniques agricoles et Évolution sociale en pays cristallin: L'Évolution de Fernoël (Puy-de-Dôme),” Notes de Géographie humaine sur l'Auvergne, Publications de la Faculté des Lettres de l'Université de Clermont, fasc. 5, Institut de Géographie, no. 1 (Paris, 1951), pp. 14–15;Google Scholarsee also idem, , “Les Bines seigneuriaux de Fernoël: État, Gestion, et Vente,” Revue d'Auvergne, 66, nos. 3–4 (1952), 111–12, 126–30;Google ScholarDelaspre, Jean, “La Complexité des Origines du Bocage dans la Région de la Sioule moyenne,” Études rhodaniennes [Revue de Géographie de Lyon], 23 (1948), 17. Unfortunately, most of this description is based on information from tax lists that exclude the propertyless. Therefore, it is impossible to evaluate exactly what proportion of the population of the Combraille in the eighteenth century consisted of propertyless journaliers.Google Scholar

17 See Poitrineau, La Vie rurale, pp. 486–96, 569; Corbin, Archaisme, pp. 163–74.Google Scholar

18 See Rouchon, “Les Biens seigneuriaux,” pp. 126ff.Google Scholar

19 See Corbin, Archaisme, 1:241–42, 256, 608.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., pp. 611–12.

21 Ibid., pp. 256, 611–12.

22 See Fel, Les Hautes Terres, pp. 261–65; Demangeon, “La Montagne,” pp. 334–37;Google Scholarsee also Marliac, Charles, “Occupation du sol et Économie agricole dans la Montagne limousine: Genitoux et Pigerolles (Creuse),” Revue d'Auvergne, 73, nos. 1–2 (1959), 33–45.Google Scholar

23 See Rouchon, “Techniques agricoles,” pp. 26–27, 29; Corbin, Archaisme, p. 139;Google ScholarCaralp-Landon, R., Les Chemins de Fer dans le Massif Central: Étude des Voies ferrées régionales (Paris, 1959), pp. 59–60, 22;Google ScholarGuerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” pp. 193–94.Google Scholar

24 See Rouchon, “Techniques agricoles,” De Guerines, “La Région nord-ouest.”Google Scholar

25 See Corbin, Archaisme, pp. 421–61; Fel, Les Hautes Terres, p.182.Google Scholar

26 See Guerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” pp. 204–6.Google Scholar

27 See Rouchon, “Techniques agricoles,” pp. 16–17, 30–32; Guerines, De, “La Région nordouest,” pp. 172, 185–86; Poitrineau, La Vie rurale, pp. 101–14; Corbin, Archaisme, 1:53–81. These sources also discuss housing.Google Scholar

28 See Poitrineau, “Aspects de l'Émigration temporaire,” pp. 30–31; idem, La Vie rurale, pp. 565–66; Corbin, “Migrations temporaires,” pp. 314–16; Demangeon, “La Montagne,” pp. 334–35; Guerines, De, “La Région nord-ouest,” pp. 169–70; Fel, Les Hautes Terres, pp. 264–65.Google Scholar