Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:22:07.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Declining Industries and the Persistence of Government Support Programs: The Quiet Decline of Gum Naval Stores Production in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Ronald N. Johnson
Ronald N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State Universit Bozeman, MT 59717. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding industrial decline is important from both historical and policy perspectives. The United States was the world's leading producer of gum naval stores in the early twentieth centuiy, but by the late 1970s production had all but ceased. Evidence presented here indicates that changing relative prices induced forest owners, the key stakeholders, to shift production towards other forest products. Nevertheless, the federal government continued to provide transfers to this industry even as political support for it vanished. The demise of this once-great American industry lends support to the received notion that once instituted, transfer programs tend to persist.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 995 - 1016
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AT-FA Journal. various dates.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert E.The Political Economy of U.S. Import Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Barzel, YoramEconomic Analysis of Property Rights, 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Frank A., and Clutter, Jerome L.. “Multiple-Product Yield Estimates for Unthinned Slash Pine Plantations–Pulpwood, Saw Timber, Gum”. U.S. Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Research Paper SE-35, 1968.Google Scholar
Brainard, S. Lael, and Verdier, Thierry. “The Political Economy of Declining Industries: Senescent Industry Collapse Revisited”. Journal of International Economics 42, no. 1–2 (1997): 221–37.Google Scholar
Butler, Carroll. Treasures of the Longleaf Pine. Shalimar, FL: Tarkel Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
Burkley, Margaret N. “Andrew Dias Poppell, 1894–1955: A Taylor County Entrepreneur”. Florida Historical Quarterly 74, no. 3 (1996): 304–18.Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven N. S. “The Contractual Nature of the Firm”. Journal of Law and Economics 26, no. 1 (1983): 1–21.Google Scholar
Clark, Alexander, and Schroeder, James G.. “Scientists Study Turpentimng Effects on Southern Pine Plywood Grade Yields”. Naval Stores Review 80, no. 9 (1970): 4–5.Google Scholar
Clements, Ralph W. “Profitable Gum Production from Limited-Face-Height Leases”. Naval Stores Review 71, no. 2 (1961): 6–7.Google Scholar
Clements, Ralph W. “Sulfuric Acid Paste Shows Promise as Means of Reducing Production Costs. Naval Stores Review 75, no. 3 (1965): 7, 11.Google Scholar
Clements, Ralph W. “Willingness to Change—Key to Survival for the Gum Naval Stores Industry”. Naval Stores Review 78, no. 9 (1968): 4–5.Google Scholar
Clements, Ralph W. “Wages Earned, Number of Faces Chipped, Production Per Man Day in the Gum Naval Stores Industry”. Naval Stores Review 83, no. 4 (1973): 6–7.Google Scholar
Clements, Ralph W. “Gum Production–An Economic Opportunity in the South”. Naval Stores Review 83, no. 6 (1973): 8–9.Google Scholar
Clements, Ralph W. “Gum Naval Stores and Its Future as an Industry”. Naval Stores Review 92, no. 1 (1982): 10–11.Google Scholar
Coate, Malcolm B., and Kleit, Andrew N.. “Antitrust Policy for Declining Industries”. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 147, no. 3 (1991): 477–98.Google Scholar
Cogan, John. “The Decline in BlackTeenage Employment: 1950–1970”. American Economic Review 72, no. 4 (1982): 621–38.Google Scholar
Coppen, J.J.W., and Hone, G.A.. Gum Naval Stores: Turpentine and Rosin from Pine Resim. FAO Series on Non-Wood Forest Products, no. 2. Rome: FAO, 1995.Google Scholar
Courson, Maxwell Taylor. “The Cup and Gutter Experiments of Charles Holmes Herty”. Georgia Historical Quarterly 64, no. 4 (1980): 459–71.Google Scholar
Deacon, Robert T. “The Simple Analytics of Forest Economics. In Forestlands, Public & Private, edited by Robert, T. Deacon and Johnson, M. Bruce, 275–302. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1985.Google Scholar
Enders, Walter. Applied Econometric lime Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.Google Scholar
Gamble, Thomas. Naval Stores: History, Production, Distribution and Consumption. Savannah, Georgia: Review Publishing & Printing Co., 1921.Google Scholar
Gartman, J. C. “Gum Farming Profitable with Acid Paste”. AT-FA Journal 30, no. 3 (1967): 7.Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J., and Newbold., P. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”. Journal of Econometrics 2, no. 2 (1974): 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, H. Peter. “Senile Industry Protection: A Proposal”. Southern Economic Journal 39, no. 4 (1973): 569–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Robert C.Program Provisions for Rye, Dry Edible Beans, Oil Crops, Tobacco, Sugar Honey, Wool, Mohair Gum Naval Stores, and Dairy Products: A Database for 1961–1990. U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS, Washington, DC: GPO, 1990.Google Scholar
Greene, William H.Econometric Analysis, 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
Hartman, Richard. “The Harvesting Decision when a Standing Forest has Value”. Economic Inquiry 14, no. 1 (1976): 52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, Arye L. “Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives”. American Economic Review 72, no. 5 (1982): 1180–87.Google Scholar
Hughes, Jonathan R. T.The Governmental Habit Redux: Economic Controls from Colonial limes to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Naval Stores History VT-174 (video tape), 1986.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ronald N., and Libecap, Gary D.. “Efficient Markets and Great Lakes Timber: A Conservative Issue Re-examined”. Explorations in Economic History 17, no. 4 (1980): 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelle, Wayne. “Talmadge Gum Bill Passed by Senate”. AT-FA Journal 30, no. 2 (1968): 4.Google Scholar
Libecap, Gary D.. Contracting for Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Malone, Joseph J.. Pine Trees and Politics: The Naval Stores and Forest Policy in Colonial New England 1691–1775. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Martin, Donald Fraser Jr. An Historical and Analytical Approach to the Current Problems of theAmerican Gum Naval Stores Industry. Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, 1942.Google Scholar
Magee, Stephen P., Brock, William A., and Young, Leslie. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Naval Stores Review. various dates.Google Scholar
Nettels, Curtis P. “British Mercantilism and Economic Development of the Thirteen Colonies”. This JOURNAL. 12, no. 2 (1952): 105–14.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. “Ocean Freight Rates and Economic Development 1750–1913”. This JOURNAL 18, no. 4 (1958): 537–55.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C.Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outland, Robert B. III. “Slavery, Work, and the Geography of the North Carolina Naval Stores Industry: 1835–1860”. Journal of Southern History 62, no. 1 (1996): 25–56.Google Scholar
Paisley, Clifton. “Wade Leonard, Florida Naval Stores Operator”. Florida Historical Quarterly 51, no. 4 (1973): 381–89.Google Scholar
Panshin, A. J., Harrar, E. S., Bethel, J. S., and Baker, W. J.. Forest Products: Their Sources, Production, and Utilization. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.Google Scholar
Payne, Henry Mace. “The Naval Stores Situation in the United States”. Department of Commerce, United States Timber Conservation Board, Washington, DC, 1932.Google Scholar
Perry, Percival. “The Naval-Stores Industry in the Old South, 1790–1860”. Journal of Southern History 34, no. 4 (1968): 509–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltznian, Sam. “Towards a More General Theory of Regulation”. Journal of Law and Economics 19, no. 2 (1976): 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopmeyer, C. S. “Effects of Turpentining on Growth of Slash Pine: First-Year Results”. Forest Science 1, no. 2 (1955): 83–87.Google Scholar
Shofner, Jerrell H. “Forced Labor in the Florida Forests”. Journal of Forest History 25, no. 1 (1981): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Robert Paul. “A Quantitative Approach to the Study of the Effects of the British Imperial Policy Upon Colonial Welfare: Some Preliminary Findings”. This JOURNAL 25, no. 4 (1965): 615–38.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, DC: GPO, various dates.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. “A Gum Yield Table for 3/4-inch Acid- Treated Streaks on Slash Pine”. Southeast Forest Experiment Station, Research Note 138, 1959.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. U.S. Timber Production, Trade, Consumption, and Price Statistics 1950–85. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1453, Washington, DC: GPO, 1986.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial limes to 1970: Bicentennial Edition. Washington, DC: GPO, 1975.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. “Summary of Trade and Tariff Information: Naval Stores (Turpentine, Rosin and Pine Gum)”. USITC Publication 841, 1983.Google Scholar
Ward, James S.Farm Commodity and Related Programs. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, Agricultural Handbook No. 345, Washington, DC: GPO, 1976.Google Scholar
Wilcox, James A. “Why Real Interest Rates Were So Low in the 1970's”. American Economic Review 73, no. 1 (1983): 44–53.Google Scholar
Woodard, Thomas G. “Evidence of the Fisher Effect from U.K. Indexed Bonds”. Review of Economics and Statistics 74, no. 2 (1992): 315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinkel, Duane F., and Russell, James, eds. Naval Stores: Production Chemistry Utilization. New York: Pulp Chemical Association, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar