Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:34:12.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consumption, Social Capital, and the “Industrious Revolution” in Early Modern Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2010

Sheilagh Ogilvie
Sheilagh Ogilvie*
Affiliation:
Professor of Economic History, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study uses evidence from central Europe to address open questions about the Consumer and Industrious Revolutions. Did they happen outside the North Atlantic economies? Were they shaped by the “social capital” of traditional institutions? How were they affected by social constraints on women? It finds that people in central Europe did desire to increase market work and consumption. But elites used the social capital of traditional institutions to oppose new work and consumption practices, especially by women, migrants, and the poor. Although they seldom blocked new practices wholly, they delayed them, limited them socially, and increased their costs.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 287 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ågren, Maria, and Erickson, Amy L., eds. Marital Economy in Scandinavia and Britain, 1400–1900. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher A.The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Beck, Rainer. “Luxus oder Decencies? Zur Konsumgeschichte der Frühneuzeit als Beginn der Moderne.” In Luxus und Konsum. Eine historische Annäherung, edited by Reith, R. and Meyer, T., 29–46. Münster: Waxmann, 2003.Google Scholar
Belfanti, Carlo Marco, and Giusberti, Fabio. “Clothing and Social Inequality in Early Modern Europe: Introductory Remarks.” Continuity and Change 15 (2000): 359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benscheidt, Anja R.Kleinbürgerlicher Besitz: Nürtinger Handwerker-Inventare von 1660–1840. Münster: Lit-Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine.The Age of Manufactures: Industry, Innovation, and Work in Britain, 1700–1820. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine.Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
BlondéBruno, E. Bruno, E.Briot, N. Coquery, and Van Aert, Laura, eds. Retailers and Consumer Changes in Early Modern Europe: England, France, Italy, and the Low Countries. Tours: Presses Universitaires François Rabelais, 2005.Google Scholar
Blondé, Bruno, and Damme, Ilya Van. “Consumer and Retail ‘Revolutions’: Perspectives from a Declining Urban Economy: Antwerp in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” Paper presented to the XIV International Economic History Congress, Helsinki, 21–25 Aug 2006.Google Scholar
Brewer, John, and Porter, Roy eds. Consumption and the World of Goods. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Bulst, Neithard.“Kleidung als sozialer Konfliktstoff. Probleme kleidergesetzlicher Normierung im sozialen Gefüge.” Saeculum 44, no. 1 (1993): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Peter, and Slack, Paul. English Towns in Transition, 1500–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Coleman, Donald C.The Economy of England, 1450–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha.An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Davids, Carel A. “Neringen, hallen en gilden. Kapitalisten, kleine ondernemers en stedelijke overheid in de tijd van de Republiek.” In Kapitaal, ondernemerschap en beleid, edited by K., Davids, Fritschy, W., and van der Valk, L. A., 95–121. Amsterdam: NEHA, 1996.Google Scholar
Davids, Carel A. “Guilds, Guildsmen, and Technological Innovation in Early Modern Europe: The Case of the Dutch Republic.” Economy and Society of the Low Countries Working Papers 2003-2, 2003.Google Scholar
de Vries, Jan. “Between Purchasing Power and the World of Goods: Understanding the Household Economy in Early Modern Europe.” In Consumption and the World of Goods, edited by Brewer, J. and Porter, R., 85–132. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
de Vries, Jan.“The Industrial Revolution and the Industrious Revolution.” The Journal of Economic History 54, no. 2 (1994): 249–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Jan. “The Industrious Revolution and Economic Growth, 1650–1830.” In The Economic Future in Historical Perspective, edited by David, P. A. and Thomas, M., 43–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
de Vries, Jan.The Industrious Revolution: Consumer Behavior and the Household Economy, 1650 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Jan, and Woude, Ad Van der. The First Modern Economy: Success, Failure, and Perseverance of the Dutch Economy, 1500–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennison, T. K., and Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Serfdom and Social Capital in Bohemia and Russia.” Economic History Review 60, no. 3 (2007): 513–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, Renate.Mägde in der Stadt. Das Beispiel Schwäbisch Hall in der Frühen Neuzeit. Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 1995.Google Scholar
Fairchilds, Cissie.“Consumption in Early Modern Europe: A Review Article.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 35, no. 4 (1993): 850–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenberger, Herman.“Fashion, Sumptuary Laws, and Business.” Business History Review 37, no. 1/2 (1963): 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Dennis A. “Industrious Households: Wealth Management and ‘Handwerker’ Strategies in Göppingen, 1735–1865.” Ph.D. diss., University of Syracuse, 1999. Hauptstaatsarchiv Stuttgart (HStAS). Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Hooper, Wilfrid.“The Tudor Sumptuary Laws.” English Historical Review 30, no. 119 (1915): 433–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Alan.Governance of the Consuming Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knodel, J. E.Demographic Behavior in the Past: A Study of Fourteen German Village Populations in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landwehr, Achim.Policey im Alltag. Die Implementation fruhneuzeitlicher Policeyordnungen in Leonberg. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2000.Google Scholar
Laurence, Anne. “How Free were English Women in the Seventeenth Century?” In Women of the Golden Age: An International Debate on Women in Seventeenth-Century Holland, England, and Italy, edited by Kloek, E., Teeuwen, N., and Huisman, M., 127–35. Hilversum: Verloren, 1994.Google Scholar
Maisch, Andreas.Notdürftiger Unterhalt und gehörige Schranken: Lebensbedingungen und Lebensstile in württembergischen Dörfern der frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart: G. Fischer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynes, Mary Jo.“Gender, Labor, and Globalization in Historical Perspective: European Spinsters in the International Textile Industry, 1750–1900.” Journal of Women’s History 15, no. 4 (2004): 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCants, Anne E. C.“After-Death Inventories as a Source for the Study of Material Culture, Economic Well-Being, and Household Formation Among the Poor of Eighteenth-Century Amsterdam.” Historical Methods 39, no. 1 (2006): 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKendrick, Neil. “Home Demand and Economic Growth: A New View of Women and Children in the Industrial Revolution.” In Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society, edited by McKendrick, N., 152–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
McKendrick, Neil. “The Consumer Revolution in Eighteenth-Century England.” In The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, edited by McKendrick, N., Brewer, J., and Porter, R., 9–33. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Medick, Hans. “Village Spinning Bees: Sexual Culture and Free Time Among Rural Youth in Early Modern Germany.” In Interest and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship, edited by Medick, H. and Sabean, D. W., 317–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Medick, Hans.“Biedermänner und Biederfrauen im alten Laichingen. Lebensweisen in einem schwäbischen Ort an der Schwelle zur Moderne.” Journal Geschichte 13 (1991): 46–61.Google Scholar
Medick, Hans.Weben und Überleben in Laichingen, 1650-1900. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.Google Scholar
Moyer, Johanna B. “Sumptuary Law in Ancien Régime France, 1229–1806.” Ph.D. diss., Syracuse University, 1996.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Women and Proto-Industrialisation in a Corporate Society: Württemberg Textile Manufacture, 1590–1790.” In Women’s Work, Family Income and the Structure of the Family in Historical Perspective, edited by Lee, W. R. and Hudson, P., 76–103. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Social Institutions and Proto-Industrialization.” In European Proto-Industrialization, edited by Ogilvie, S. and Cerman, M., 23–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.State Corporatism and Proto-Industry: The Württemberg Black Forest, 1580-1797. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “The German State: A Non-Prussian View.” In Rethinking Leviathan: The Eighteenth-Century State in Britain and Germany, edited by Hellmuth, E. and Brewer, J., 167–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.A Bitter Living: Women, Markets, and Social Capital in Early Modern Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.“Guilds, Efficiency, and Social Capital: Evidence from German Proto-Industry.” Economic History Review 57, no. 2 (2004): 286–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.“How Does Social Capital Affect Women? Guilds and Communities in Early Modern Germany.” American Historical Review 109, no. 2 (2004): 325–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.“Women and Labor Markets in Early Modern Germany.” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 2004, no. 2 (2004): 25–60.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.“The Use and Abuse of Trust: The Deployment of Social Capital by Early Modern Guilds.” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 2005, no. 1 (2005): 15–52.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.“’So That Every Subject Knows How to Behave’: Social Disciplining in Early Modern Bohemia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 48, no. 1 (2006): 38–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Can We Rehabilitate the Guilds? A Sceptical Reappraisal.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0745, 2007.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.“’Whatever is, is Right’? Economic Institutions in Preindustrial Europe.” Economic History Review 60, no. 4 (2007): 649–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh.“Rehabilitating the Guilds: A Reply.” Economic History Review 61, no. 1 (2008): 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Verheiratete Frauen und Märkte im Württemberg der Frühen Neuzeit.” In Frauen und Geld. Wider die ökonomische Unsichtbarkeit von Frauen, edited by Regnath, R. J. and Rudolph, C., 43–86. Königstein: Ulrike Helmer Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Consumption, Social Capital, and the ‘Industrious Revolution’ in Early Modern Germany (long version).” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No. 0943, Oct. 2009.Google Scholar
OgilvieSheilagh, Markus Küpker Sheilagh, Markus Küpker, and Maegraith, Janine Christina. “Women and the Material Culture of Food in Early Modern Germany.” Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4 (2009): 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, Mark, Whittle, Jane, Dean, Darron, et al. Production and Consumption in English households, 1600-1750. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Penn, Simon A. C.“Female Wage Earners in Late Fourteenth-Century England.” Agricultural History Review 35 (1987): 1–14.Google Scholar
Pfarrarchiv Ebhausen (PAE). Ebhausen, Germany, various volumes.Google Scholar
Pfarrarchiv Wildberg (PAW). Wildberg, Germany, various volumes.Google Scholar
Pinchera, Valeria. “Art Consumption in Early Modern Florence.” Paper presented to the XIV International Economic History Congress, Helsinki, 21–25 Aug. 2006.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Kenneth.The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Rafaella Y.. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Ramos, Fernando. “Patterns of Textile Consumption in Preindustrial Spain: Castile, 1750–1850. Consumption Revolution Without Industrial Revolution?” Paper presented to the Economic History Society Annual Conference, London, 2–4 April 2004.Google Scholar
Reyscher, August Ludwig.Vollständige, historisch und kritisch bearbeitete Sammlung der württembergischen Gesetze. 18 volumes. Tübingen: Fues, 1828ff.Google Scholar
Ringrose, David R.Spain, Europe, and the “Spanish Miracle,” 1700-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Roche, Daniel.A History of Everyday Things: The Birth of Consumption in France, 1600-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Roper, Lyndal.The Holy Household: Women and Morals in Reformation Augsburg. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.Google Scholar
Ross, Robert. “Sumptuary Laws in Europe, the Netherlands, and the Dutch Colonies.” In Contingent Lives: Social Identity and Material Culture in the VOC World, edited by Worden, Nigel, 382–91. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, 2006.Google Scholar
Rye, William Brenchley.England as Seen by Foreigners in the Days of Elizabeth and James I. London: John Russell Smith, 1865.Google Scholar
Sabean, David W.Property, Production, and Family in Neckarhausen, 1700-1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Safley, Thomas Max.Children of the Laboring Poor: Expectation and Experience Among the Orphans of Early Modern Augsburg. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schama, Simon.The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age. London: Collins, 1987.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ariadne.“Survival Strategies of Widows and Their Families in Early Modern Holland, c. 1580–1750.” The History of the Family 12, no. 4 (2007): 268–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soly, Hugo.“The Political Economy of European Craft Guilds: Power Relations and Economic Strategies of Merchants and Master Artisans in the Medieval and Early Modern Textile Industries.” International Review of Social History 53 (2008): 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styles, John, and Vickery, Amanda, eds. Gender, Taste, and Material Culture in Britain and North America, 1700-1830. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Troeltsch, Walter.Die Calwer Zeughandlungskompagnie und ihre Arbeiter. Studien zur Gewerbe- und Sozialgeschichte Altwürttembergs. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1897.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, Claudia.Shulamit und Margarete: Macht, Geschlecht und Religion in einer ländlichen Gesellschaft des 18. Jahrhunderts. Vienna: Böhlau, 1999.Google Scholar
Van den Heuvel, Danielle.Women and Entrepreneurship: Female Traders in the Northern Netherlands, c. 1580-1815. Amsterdam: Aksant, 2007.Google Scholar
Van Nederveen Meerkerk, Elise.De draad in eigen handen. Vrouwen in loonarbeid in de Nederlandse textielnijverheid, 1581-1810. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, 2006.Google Scholar
Vickery, Amanda.“His and Hers: Gender, Consumption, and Household Accounting in Eighteenth-Century England.” Past and Present 192 (2006): 12–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Patrick.“Apprenticeship and Training in Premodern England.” The Journal of Economic History 68, no. 3 (2008): 832–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warde, Paul.“Law, the “Commune,” and the Distribution of Resources in Early Modern German State Formation.” Continuity and Change 17 (2002): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar