Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T15:10:40.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Papers by Eagly and Smith, and Green and Urquhart

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Michael Edelstein
Michael Edelstein
Affiliation:
Queens College, C.U.N.Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers Presented at the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 253 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Joslin, D. M., “London Private Bankers, 1720–1785,” Economic History Review, 2nd Series, 7 (1954–1955), pp. 167–186.Google Scholar

2 Leff, N. H., “Dependency Rates and Savings Rates,” American Economic Review, 59 (1969), pp. 886–96Google Scholar. Gupta, K. L., “Dependency Rates and Savings Rates: Comment,” American Economic Review, 61 (1971), pp. 469–471.Google Scholar

3 David, P. A. and Scadding, J. L., “Private Savings: Ultrarationality, Aggregation, and ‘Denison's Law’,” Journal of Political Economy, 82 (1974), pp. 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar