Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:22:22.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capital Structure and the Financial Development of the U.S. Sugar-Refining Industry, 1875–1905

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

William M. Doyle
William M. Doyle
Affiliation:
William M. Doyle is Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of Dallas, Irving, TX 75062-4736. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this article I develop a taxonomy of financial practices based on whether financial activity is intended to fund new capital investment or to create new financial structures to accommodate planned changes in the structure of an industry's existing capital stock. The taxonomy is then applied to the financial development of the U.S. sugar-refining industry between 1875 and 1905. The taxonomy provides an explanation of the rise of the large, widely held industrial corporation in the United States that is more consistent with the historical record than are the conventional “financial strain” or “asset liquidation” hypotheses.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 190 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baskin, Michael. “The Development of Corporate Financial Markets in Britain and the United States, 1600–1914: Overcoming Asymmetric Information.” Business History Review 62, no. 2 (1988):199–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, Jonathan, and Miranti, Paul JrA History of Corporate Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., and Willig, R. D.. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.Google Scholar
Berle, Adolph A., and Means, Gardiner C.. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1933.Google Scholar
Cameron, Rondo. A Concise Economic History of the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Cameron, Rondo, ed. Banking in the Early Stages of Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D.The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D.Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4, n.s., no. 15 (1937): 386–405.Google Scholar
Davis, Lance. “The Investment Market, 1870–1914: The Evolution of a National Market.” This JOURNAL 25, no. 3 (1965): 355–400.Google Scholar
Davis, Lance. “The Capital Markets and Industrial Concentration: The U.S. and U.K., a Comparative Study.” Economic History Review 19, no. 3 (1966): 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Lance. “Saving and Investment.” In Encyclopedia of American Economic History: Studies of the Principle Movements and Ideas, Vol. 1, edited by Glen, Porter, pp. 183–201. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1980.Google Scholar
Davis, Lance, Easterlin, Richard A., Parker, William N. et al. , American Economic Growth: An Economists History of the United States. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar
Doyle, William M. The Evolution of Financial Practices and Financial Structures Among American Manufacturers, 1875–1905: Case Studies of the Meat Packing and Sugar Refining Industries. Ph.D. diss., University of Tennessee, 1991.Google Scholar
Eichner, Alfred S.The Emergence of Oligopoly: Sugar Refining as a Case Study. Baltimore: The Johns-Hopkins Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Raymond W.Financial Structure and Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Gerald. A New Economic History of America. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friederich. The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Hughes, Jonathan. American Economic History. 3rd ed.Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co., 1990.Google Scholar
Kramer, Helen. “Harvesters and High Finance: Formation of the International Harvester Company.” Business History Review 38, no.3 (1964): 283–301.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Ludwig. Capital and its Structure. London: Bell & Sons, Ltd., 1956.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi. The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Lazonick, William. Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Louisiana Planter. 4 11 1905.Google Scholar
Mullins, Jack Simpson. The Sugar Trust: Henry O. Havemeyer and the American Sugar Refining Company. Ph.D. diss. University of South Carolina, 1964.Google Scholar
Myers, Margaret G.The New York Money Market: Origins and Development. New York: Columbia University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Navin, Thomas R., and Sears, Marian V.. “The Rise of a Market for Industrial Securities, 1887–1902.” The Business History Review 29, no. 3 (1955): 105–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Ralph. Merger Movements in American Industry, 1895–1956. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
New York Legislature, Joint Committee to Investigate Trusts (Lexow Committee). Report and Proceedings. Albany: Wynkorp, Hallenbreck, Crawford, 1897.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Anthony Patrick. “Factory Size, Economies of Scale and the Great Merger Wave of 1898–1902”. This JOURNAL 48, no. 3 (1988): 639–49.Google Scholar
Penrose, Edith. The Theory and Growth of the Firm. White Plains NY: Sharpe, 1959.Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney. “Fixed Capital in the Industrrial Revolution in Britain”. This JOURNAL 24, no. 3 (1964): 299–314.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A.History of Economie Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A.The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
U. S. Committee on Manufactures. Report on Trusts. 50th Cong., 1st sess. Washington, DC: GPO, 1888.Google Scholar
U.S. Industrial Commission. Reports. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: GPO, 1900.Google Scholar
U.S. Special Committee on the Investigation of the American Sugar Refining Company and Others (Hardwick Committee). Hearings. 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Washington, DC: GPO, 1912.Google Scholar
Vogt, Paul L. “The Sugar Refining Industry in the United States”. Publicationr in the University of Pennsylvania Series in Political Economy and Public Law, 21. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1908.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution and Attributes” Journal of Economic Literature 29, no.4 (1981): 1537–68.Google Scholar