¹ Stopford, John, “The Origins of British Based Multinational Manufacturing Enterprises,” Business History Review, 48 (Autumn 1974), 303–45;Google ScholarPaterson, D., British Direct Investment in Canada, 1870–1914 (Toronto, 1976);Google ScholarNicholas, S. J., “British Multinational Investment Before 1939,” Journal of European Economic History, 11 (Winter 1982), 605–30;Google ScholarBuckley, Peter J. and Roberts, Brian, European Direct Investment in the U.S.A. Before World War I (London, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Svedberg, Peter, “The Portfolio: Direct Composition of Private Foreign Investment in 1914 Revisited,” Economic Journal, 88 (12 1978), 690–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ Dunning, John, “Changes in the Level and Structure of International Production: The Last 100 Years”, mimeographed (1982), pp. 4, 31.Google Scholar

⁴ Nicholas, , “Multinational Investment”, p. 10.Google Scholar

⁵ Buckley, and Roberts, , European Direct Investment, p. 119.Google Scholar

⁶ Dunning, , “International Production”, pp. 4.26–4. 65.Google Scholar

⁷ See Buckley, Peter J. and Casson, Mark, The Future of the Multinational Enterprise (London, 1976), pp. 10–30;CrossRefGoogle ScholarCasson, Mark C., Alternative to the Multinational Enterprise (London, 1979), pp. 31–43;CrossRefGoogle ScholarJohnson, Harry G., “The Efficiency and Welfare Implications of the International Corporation,” in The International Corporation, ed. Kindleberger, Charles P. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1970), pp. 35–39;Google ScholarMagee, Steven P., “Technology and the Appropriability Theory of the Multinational Corporation” in The New International Economic Order, ed. Bhajwati, J. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1976), pp. 319–21.Google Scholar

⁸ See Buckley, and Roberts, , European Direct Investment, pp. 8–9; Nicholas, “Multinational Investment,” pp. 9–10; Dunning, “International Production,” pp. 4–24, 4–34.Google Scholar

⁹ For a review of the literature see Calvet, A. K., “A Synthesis of Foreign Direct Investment Theories and Theories of the Multinational Firm,” Journal of International Business Studies, 12 (Spring/Summer 1981), 43–57.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Coase, R. H., “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, n.s. 4 (1937), 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Ibid., p. 397.

¹² Aichian, A. and Demsetz, H., “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization,” American Economic Review, 62 (12 1972), 777–95;Google ScholarDahlman, C. J., “The Problem of Externality,” Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (04 1979), 141–62;CrossRefGoogle ScholarWilliamson, O., “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes,” Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (12 1981), 1545–50.Google Scholar

¹³ McManus, John C., “The Costs of Alternative Economic Organizations,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 8 (11 1975), 335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Nicholas, , “Multinational Investment,” pp. 14–16.Google Scholar See also Wilkins, Mira, The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1970), pp. 207–13;Google ScholarWilkins, Mira, The Maturing of Multinational Business (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1979), pp. 417–22, 432–37;Google ScholarBuckley and Roberts, European Direct Investment, pp. 44, 65, 87, 91–92.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Nicholas, , “Multinational Investment,” p. 15.Google Scholar

¹⁶ For a similar point see Calvet, , “Synthesis,” p. 56.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Magee, , “Technology,” p. 316.Google Scholar

¹⁸ This problem has been examined by the marketing channel literature. See Stern, L. W., Sternthal, B., and Craig, C. S., “Managing Conflict in Distribution Channels: A Laboratory Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (05 1973), 169–79;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPearson, M. and Monoly, J., “The Role of Conflict and Co-operation in Channel Performance,” in Marketing: 1776–1976 and Beyond, ed. Bemhardt, K. L. (Chicago, 1976), pp. 240–44;Google ScholarRosenberg, L. J. and Stem, L. W., “Conflict Measurement in the Distribution Channel,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (11 1971), 437–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (11 1976), 305–11;CrossRefGoogle ScholarRoss, Stephen, “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem,” American Economic Review, 63 (05 1973), 134–49;Google ScholarRoss, Stephen, “On the Economic Theory of Agency and the Principal of Similarity,” in Essays on Economic Behaviour Under Uncertainty, ed. Balch, M., McFadden, D., and Wu, S. (Amsterdam, 1974), pp. 215–20.Google Scholar

²⁰ Williamson, Oliver, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antit rust Implications (New York, 1975), pp. 26–37;Google ScholarTeece, David J., Vertical Integration and Divestiture in the U.S. Oil Industry (Stanford, 1976), p. 31;Google ScholarWilliamson, Oliver, “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (10 1979), p. 233. Of course, the principal could also act opportunistically. The paper, however, is concerned with the principal establishing branch selling rather than the agent's contractual problems with the principal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²¹ Klein, B., Crawford, R., and Alchian, A., “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process,” Journal of Law and Economics, 11 (10 1978), 297–326;CrossRefGoogle ScholarKlein, B., “Transaction Cost Determinants of ‘Unfair’ Contractual Arrangements,” American Economic Review, 70 (05 1980), 356–62;Google ScholarKlein, B. and Leffler, K., “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performances,” Journal of Political Economy, 89 (08 1981), 615–41;CrossRefGoogle ScholarWilliamson, , “Transaction Cost Economics,” p. 234, 238–45; Klein, “‘Unfair’ Contractual Arrangements,” pp. 358–59; Klein, Crawford, and Alchian, “Competitive Contracting Process”, pp. 302–7; Klein and Leffler, “Role of Market Forces”, pp. 618–25.Google Scholar

²² Klein, , Crawford, , and Aichian, , “Competitive Contracting Process,” p. 303; Klein and Leffler, “Role of Market Forces,” pp. 616–20.Google Scholar

²³ The firms, by industrial groups, were Huntley Palmer and Peak Frean in food; Bentall, Ransomes, Marshall and Fowler in agricultural machinery; A. W. Smith and Mirrlees Watson in sugar-crushing machinery; Alexander Cowan and Blackie Sons Ltd. in paper and publishing; in steel products and cutlery, Osborn Steel, Spear and Jackson, and George Wostenhoim & Sons; in engineering, the pump makers, Weir, and Harvey & Co.; Gourock Rope Company in rope; Morton (Sundour) and Linen Thread Company Ltd. in textiles; and Beardmore in shipbuilding and iron and steel. The merchant houses, Anthony Gibb, London, and John Finlay, Scotland, acted as agents when they signed exclusive agreements to represent British firms abroad.Google Scholar

²⁴ United Nations, Transactional Corporations in World Development: A Re-Examination, E.78 II A5 (New York, 1978). This definition is also used by the Group of Eminent Persons in their report, United NationsGoogle Scholar, The Impact of Multinational Corporations on Development and on International Relations, E.74 II AS (New York, 1974), p. 25;Google Scholar and by Dunning, John, International Production and the Multinational Enterprise (London, 1981), p. 3. Further, 13 of the firms subsequently made an investment in assembly and manufacturing in the period.Google Scholar

²⁵ Coleman, D., Courtalds: An Economic and Social History (Oxford, 1969), vol. 1, p. 193. I would like to thank Robert Kirk for information on Platt Bros. agency contracts.Google Scholar

²⁶ For example, Spear and Jackson's agent promised to “deligently and faithfully service the market to the best of his ability and judgment” (Spear and Jackson, Agreements, SJ6S 3/7/29, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives). Gourock's agent agreed “to take steps to introduce and sell to local customers” (Gourock, Agency Agreements, UGD42/163/3, 22/1/31, University of Glasgow Archives [where page numbers are not available the date of the reference is given]).Google Scholar

²⁷ Spear and Jackson, Agency Correspondence, Alex Vox, Paris, SJC65, 26/4/27, 1/6/27, 3/7/29, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.Google Scholar

²⁸ Platt, Agreement, DDPSL 1/109/1, Lancashire Record Office, Preston. Also Fowler, Toepifer Agreement, COl/9, Institute for Agricultural History, University of Reading; and Bentall, Agreements, DFI/16 1924, Essex Record Office.Google Scholar

²⁹ Smith, A. W., Directors' Minute Book, UGDI18/13/1, 19/2/69, p. 5, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar

³⁰ Rutnager, S. M., Bombay Industries: The Cotton Mills (Bombay, 1927), pp. 643–46. I would also like to thank Robert Kirk for information on this point.Google Scholar

³¹ In 1929 Fowler's stocked machinery valued at £15,297 with their Italian agents and £16,956 with their German agents. Fowler, Memorandum on Branches, AC9/63, 31/12/29, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

³² Marshall, , Agency Term Book No. 1, pp. 238–40, Institute for Agricultural History; Gourock, Agency Agreements, UGD42/103/3, 22/10, 31, University of Glasgow Archives; Smith, Minute Book, UGDI18/1311, 17/8/14, p. 114, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar

³³ Ransomes, , Agency Book, AD7/48, p. 7, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid., pp. 36–42; Marshall, Agency Term Book No. I, pp. 238–40, Institute for Agricultural History; Fowler, Toepifer Agreement, COl/9, Institute for Agricultural History.

³⁵ Marshall, , Agency Term Book No. 1, pp. 165–68, 183, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ibid., p. 274.

³⁷ Spear and Jackson, Agreements, SJC65 10/2/20, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.Google Scholar

³⁸ Osborn, , Letter Book, Osb. 17, pp. 220, 230, 397, 421, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.Google Scholar

³⁹ Osborn, Works Meeting Minutes 1907–24, Osb. 142 9/10/11, 11/12/11, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Smith, A. W., Directors' Minutes No. 1, UGD118/17/2a, pp. 11, 149; Directors' Minutes No.2, UGDI 18/17/2b, pp. 102, 104, 127, 232–34, 275, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Palmer, G., “The History of the Orwell Works,” p. SPI/IHS, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

⁴² Spear and Jackson, Agreements, SJC65 3/7/29, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives; Gourock, Agency Agreements, UGD42/103/3 1/12/27, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar

⁴³ Gourock, Agency Agreements, UGD42/103/3 1/8/14; 1/12/27.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Frean, Peak, Carr Agency Records, PK13/4 1/7/01, University of Reading Library Archives.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Spear, and Jackson, , Agreements, SJC65 12/3/19, 3/7/29, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Ransomes, , Agency Book, AD7/49, pp. 68–79, Institute for Agricultural History; Gourock, Agency Agreement, UGD42/103/3 1/6/26, 4/22, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Gibb, , General Records: Macfarlaine Strong Co. 1889, Ms 11,668/1, London Guildhall Archives;Google ScholarPerkins, E. J., Financing Anglo-American Trade: The House of Brown, 1800–1880 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978), pp. 5–8;Google ScholarCottrell, P., “Commercial Enterprise,” in The Dynamics of Victorian Business, ed. Church, Roy (London, 1980), p. 240.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Osborn, , Letter Book, Osb. 17, pp. 222–30, 397, 421, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Ransomes, , Agency Book, AD7/48, p. 8, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Ibid.

⁵¹ Fowler, Packet: Societa Anonime La Penetrazione Roma, AD6/8, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

⁵² Marshall, , Agency Term Book No. 1, pp. 47–48, 235–37, Institute for Agricultural History; Peak Frean, Special Agencies, PF14/2, University of Reading Library Archives.Google Scholar

⁵³ Spear and Jackson, Agreements, SJC65 3/7/29, Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Smith, A. W., Directors's Minute Book, UGD118/13/2, pp. 213–14, 221–27, 275, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Evans, J., The Endless Web: John Dickinson & Co. 1804–1954 (London, 1955), pp. 138–41;Google ScholarCape Asbestos: The Story of Cape Asbestos Co. Ltd., 1894–1953 (private, 1953); Harvey, Johanesberg Branch: Hosken's Account, DDH/85, Cornwall County Record OfficeGoogle Scholar, E., TruroVale, The Harveys of Hayle (private, 1960), p. 44;Google ScholarDavies, R., Twenty One and a Half Bishops Lane: A History of J. H. Fenner Co. Ltd. (private, 1961).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Palmer, , “Orwell Works,” p. SPA/1F54C, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ ”Fowler, Branch Reports, AC7/63, Institute for Agricultural History; Wostenhoim, New York Office, WosR12(b), Sheffield Public Libraries Archives.

⁵⁸ Buckley, Peter and Casson, M., “The Optimal Timing of a Foreign Investment,” Economic Journal, 91 (03 1981), 75–87;CrossRefGoogle ScholarCasson, M., “Forward”, in Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets, Rugman, A. (London, 1981), pp. 15–21;Google ScholarBuckley, , “New Theories of International Business”, pp. 2.12–15.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Fowler, South African Branch Correspondence, AD6/11 3/04, Institute for Agricultural History.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Ibid.

⁶¹ Ibid.

⁶² Cowan, Reports: Argentina 1938, UGD3 11/7/34, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar

⁶³ Cowan, Reports: Australia, UGD311/7/34, University of Glasgow Archives.Google Scholar