Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T06:35:21.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Uneven Rise of American Public Schools to 1850

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

Sun Go  and
Peter Lindert
Sun Go*
Affiliation:
Visiting Fellow, Korea Institute of Public Finance (KIPF), 28 Bangjugmalgil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-774, Korea. E-mail: [email protected].
Peter Lindert*
Affiliation:
Distinguished Professor of Economics, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three factors help to explain why school enrollments in the Northern United States were higher than those in the South and in most of Europe by 1850. One was affordability: the northern schools had lower direct costs relative to income. The second was the greater autonomy of local governments. The third was the greater diffusion of voting power among the citizenry in much of the North, especially in rural communities. The distribution of local political voice appears to be a robust predictor of tax support and enrollments, both within and between regions. Extra local voice raised tax support without crowding out private support for education.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beadie, Nancy “Toward a History of Education Markets in the United States.” Social Science History 32 no. 1 (Spring 2008a): 47–73.Google Scholar
Beadie, Nancy “Tuition-Funding in Common Schools: Education Markets and Market Regulation in Nineteenth-Century New York, 1815–1850” Social Science History 32, no. 1, (Spring 2008b): 107–33.Google Scholar
Beadie, NancyEducation and the Creation of Capital in the Early American Republic New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Burgess, W. Randolph. Trends in School Costs New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1920Google Scholar
Carlton, Frank Tracy. “Economic Influences Upon Educational Progress in the United States, 1820–1850.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, reprinted in University of Wisconsin Bulletin, Economics and Political Science Series, Vol. IV, no. 1, 1906.Google Scholar
Carter, Linda, and Margo, Robert A.. “The Feminization of Teaching in the United States: An Historical Overview.” In Gender and Education: An Encyclopedia, edited by Barbara, J. Bank, 661–66. New York: Greenwood Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan et al. Historical Statistics of the United States: Millennial Edition New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory “England Series of Prices and Wages.” Available only at http://gpih.ucdavis.edu.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M., Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. “Electoral Data for Counties in the United States: Presidential and Congressional races, 1840–1972” [Computer file]. ICPSR08611-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 2006 11–13.Google Scholar
Cressy, DavidLiteracy and the Social Order Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, WhitneyThe Burned-over District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New York, 1800–1850 Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Cubberley, Ellwood P.Public Education in the United States Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1934Google Scholar
Einhorn, Robin L.American Taxation, American Slavery Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., Mariscal, Elisa, and Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “Schooling, Suffrage, and the Persistence of Inequality in the Americas, 1800–1945.” Unpublished Manuscript, 2002.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “The Evolution of Suffrage Institutions in the New World.” This Journal 65, no. 4, (December 2005) 891–921.Google Scholar
Epple, Dennis, and Romano, Richard E.. “Public Provision of Private Goods.” Journal of Political Economy 104, no. 1(February 1996a): 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis “Ends against the Middle: Determining Public Service Provision When There are Private Alternatives.” Journal of Public Economics 62, no. 3 (November 1996b): 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander “Economic and Demographic Determinants of Educational Commitment, Massachusetts, 1855.” This Journal 39, no. 2 (June 1979): 435–59.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert “The Common School Revival: Fact or Fancy?” In Industrialization in Two Systems, edited by Henry, Rosovsky, 40–67. New York: Wiley, 1966a.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert “Levels of Nineteenth-Century American Investment in Education.” This Journal 26, no. 4 (December 1966b): 418–36.Google Scholar
Go, Sun, and Lindert, Peter H.. “The Curious Dawn of American Public Schools.” NBER Working Paper No. 13335, Cambridge, MA, August 2007.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia “The Human Capital Century and American Leadership: Virtues of the Past.” This Journal 61, no. 2 (June 2001): 263–92.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Katz, Lawrence F.. The Race between Technology and Education Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Sokoloff, Kenneth “The Relative Productivity Hypothesis of Industrialization: The American Case, 1820–1850.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, no. 3 (August 1984): 461–88.Google Scholar
Green, Fletcher MelvinConstitutional Development in the South Atlantic States, 1776–1860: A Study in the Evolution of Democracy. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1930; reissued in 1966, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Green, Fletcher MelvinDemocracy in the Old South, and Other Essays Edited by Copeland, J. IsaacNashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1969. Includes his “Democracy in the Old South” from the Journal of Southern History, 1946.Google Scholar
Griffey, Carl HayesThe History of Local School Control in the State of New York New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1936.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R.“Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790–2000.” [Computer file]. ICPSR02896-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005–04-29.Google Scholar
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. “Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790–1970.” ICPSR 3, 1970. Downloadable from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.Google Scholar
Kaestle, CarlThe Evolution of an Urban School System: New York City, 1750–1850 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaestle, Carl “‘Between the Scylla of Brutal Ignorance and the Charybdis of a Literary Education’: Elite Attitudes toward Mass Schooling in Early Industrial England and America.” In Schooling and Society: Studies in the History of Education, edited by Lawrence, Stone177–91. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Kaestle, CarlPillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780–1860 New York: Hill & Wang, 1983Google Scholar
Kaestle, Carl, and Vinovskis, Maris “Quantification, Urbanization, and the History of Education: An Analysis of the Determinants of School Attendance in New York State in 1845.” Historical Methods Newsletter 8, no. 1 (December 1974): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaestle, CarlEducation and Social Change in Nineteenth-Century Massachusetts New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyssar, AlexanderThe Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States New York: Basic Books, 2000. (Appendix. State Suffrage Laws.)Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H.Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century Two volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H.“Massachusetts vs. England, WV.xls.” Available at http://gpih.ucdavis.edu, 2009.Google Scholar
Majewski, JohnA House Dividing: Economic Development in Pennsylvania and Virginia Before the Civil War Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, E. Jennifer. Learning to Read and Write in Colonial America Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2005.Google Scholar
New York Superintendent of Common Schools. Annual Report Albany State of New York, 1820–1855.Google Scholar
North Carolina Superintendent of Common Schools. Second Annual Report Raleigh, NC W. W. Holden 1855.Google Scholar
Perlmann, Joel, and Margo, Robert A.. Women's Work? American Schoolteachers, 1650–1920 Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prest, JohnLiberty and Locality: Parliament, Permissive Legislation, and Ratepayers’ Democracies in the Nineteenth Century Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psacharapoulos, G., and Patrinos, H. A. “Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2881, 2002.Google Scholar
Randall, Samuel SidwellA Digest of the Common School System of the State of New-York Albany, NY: C. Van Benthuysen & Co., 1844Google Scholar
Soltow, Lee, and Stevens, EdwardThe Rise of Literacy and the Common School in the United States Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Stoddard, Christiana “Why Did Education Become Publicly Funded? Evidence from the Nineteenth-Century Growth of Public Primary Schooling in the United States.” This Journal 69, no. 1 (March 2009): 172–201.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Francis NewtonThe Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters, and other Organic Laws of the State, Territories, and Colonies Now or Heretofore Forming the United States of America 59th Cong., 2nd sess., House. Washington: GPO, 1909.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64, no. 5 (September-October 1956): 416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Kim, and Beadie, Nancy “Socioeconomic Incentives to Teach in New York and North Carolina: Toward a More Complex Model of Teacher Labor Markets 1800–1850.” History of Education Quarterly 46, no. 1 (Spring 2006): 36–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Education in England and Wales—Select Committee Report …” Sessional Papers (465), 1835, vol. VII.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Report of the Commissioners … the State of Popular Education in England.” Sessional Papers, 2794-I, 1861.Google Scholar
University of Minnesota, Department of History. “Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS).” “Historical Census Project.” ICPSR 116, 2009. Downloadable from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Education. Annual Report, 1900/01.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, Maris “Have We Underestimated the Extent of Antebellum High School attendance?” History of Education Quarterly 28 (1988): 551–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, ChiltonAmerican Suffrage: From Property to Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. “The Structure of Pay in Britain, 1710–1911.” Research in Economic History 7 (1982): 1–54.Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph A.The People in Power: Courthouse and Statehouse in the Lower South, 1850–1860 Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph A.Politicians, Planters, and Plain Folk: Courthouse and Statehouse in the Upper South, 1850–1860 Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll D. “Historical Review of Wages and Prices, 1752–1860.” Sixteenth Annual Report of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor Boston: Wright & Potter, 1885Google Scholar
Wright, GavinOld South, New South New York: Basic Books 1986.Google Scholar
Wright, GavinSlavery and American Economic Development. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar