Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:20:19.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time and Work in Eighteenth-Century London

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Hans-Joachim Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
Affiliation:
Consulting Assistant Professor of Economics at Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305–6072.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Witnesses' accounts are used to analyze changes in working hours between 1750 and 1800. Two findings stand out. The article demonstrates that the information contained in witnesses' accounts allows us to reconstruct historical time-budgets and provides extensive tests of the new method. Estimates of annual labor input in 1749/63 and 1799/1803 are presented. It emerges that the number of annual working hours changed rapidly between the middle and the of the eighteenth century. These findings have important implications for the issue of total factor productivity during the Industrial Revolution.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 29 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berg, Maxine, and Hudson, Pat. “Rehabilitating the Industrial Revolution.” Economic Histoiy Review 45, 1 (1992): 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bienefeld, Michael. Working Hours in British Industry: An Economic History. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1972.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa. “Comment.” In “Work and Leisure in Industrial Society.” Past and Present 30 (1965): 96–98.Google Scholar
Campbell, Richard. The London Tradesman. London: T. Gardner, 1747.Google Scholar
City of London and County of Middlesex. Old Bailey Session Papers. Whole Proceedings on the King 's Commission of the Peace, and Oyer and Terminer and Gaol Delivery for Newgate. London, various years.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory, and van der Werf, Y.. “The Industrious Revolution or the Calvinist Middle Ages? Agrarian Work Life in Pre-Industhal England.” Working Paper 87, Agricultural History Center, University of California at Davis, 1996.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory. “A Revolution Too Many: The Agricultural Revolution, 1700–1850.” Working Paper 91, Agricultural History Center, University of California at Davis, 1997.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., and Harley, C. Knick. “Output Growth and the Industrial Revolution: A Restatement of the Crafts-Harley View.” Economic History Review 45, 4 (1992): 703–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R.British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Craine, Roger. “On the Service Flow from Labour.” Review of Economic Studies 40, 11 (1973): 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demaris, Alexander. Logit Modeling. Practical Applications. Newbury Park: Sage 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Jan,. “Between Purchasing Power and the World of Goods: Understanding the Household Economy in Early Modern Europe.” In Consumption and the World of Goods, edited by Porter, R. and Brewer, J., 85–132. London: Routledge 1993.Google Scholar
de Vries, Jan,. “The Industrial Revolution and the Industrious Revolution.” this JOURNAL 54, 2 (1994): 249–70.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H. “Conjectures and Contrivances: Economic Growth and the Standard of Living in Britain During the Industrial Revolution.” Oxford Economic History Working Paper No. 9, 1996.Google Scholar
Feldstein, Martin. “Specification of Labour Input in the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economic Studies 34 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenberger, Herman, and Cummins, Gaylord. “Health, Work and Leisure before the Industrial Revolution.” Explorations in Economic History 13, 1 (1976): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenberger, Herman. “Das Arbeitsjahr.” In Wirtschaftliche und soziale Strukturen im sækularen Wandel. Festschrift für Wilhelm Abel zum 70. Geburtstag, Bd.2. Die vorindustrielle Zeit: Auβeragrarische Probleme, edited by Ingomar, Bog et al., 85–108. Hannover: n.p., 1974.Google Scholar
Hardy, Melissa. Regression with Dummy Variables, Newbury Park: Sage 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Michael. “Introduction.” In The Old Bailey Proceedings. Parts One and Two. A Listing and Guide to the Harvester Microfilm Collection, 1714–1834, 1–71. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hauck, Walter, and Donner, Allan. “Wald's Test as Applied to Hypotheses in Logit Analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 72 (1977): 851–53.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Eric. “Working Hours and Conditions during the Industrial Revolution: A Re-Appraisal.” Economic History Review 35, 1 (1982): 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, Michael, and Lewchuk, Wayne. “Glory Days? Work Hours, Labor Market Regulations and Convergence in Late Nineteenth Century Europe.” Paper presented at the All-U.C. Group in Economic History Conference, University of California, Davis, 11 14–16, 1997.Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul, and Nicholas, Steve. “Health and Welfare of Women in the United Kingdom 1785–1920.” Paper presented to the NBER conference on health and welfare during industrialization, Cambridge, MA, 04 21–22, 1995.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric. Agriculture and the Industrial Revolution (New York: Wiley, 1974).Google Scholar
Thomas, Juster F., Thomas, F.. “Response Errors in the Measurement of Time Use.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 394 (1986): 390–402.Google Scholar
Thomas, Juster F., Thomas, F., and Stafford, Frank. “The Allocation of Time: Empirical Findings, Behavioral Models, and Problems of Measurement.” Journal of Economic Literature 29, 2 (1991): 471–522.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Pauper Inventories and the Material Lives of the Poor in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries.” Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge 1995.Google Scholar
Komlos, John. Nutrition and Economic Development in the Eighteenth Century Habsburg Monarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John. “The Secular Trend in the Biological Standard of Living.” Economic History Review 46, 1 (1993): 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Derek. “The Productivity of Hours in U.S. Manufacturing Industries.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 66, 3 (1984): 486–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, Peter, and Williamson, Jeffrey. “Revising England's Social Tables, 1688–1913.” Explorations in Economic History 19, 4 (1982): 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus. Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Matthews, Robin, Feinstein, Charles H., and John, C. Odling-Smee. British Economic Growth 1856–1973. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. “1780–1860: A Survey.” The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, 2d ed., edited by Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald, 242–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Millan, J.Coins, Weights and Measure of all Nations reduced into English. London, 1749.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. “The Industrial Revolution and the New Economic History.” In The Economics of the Industrial Revolution, edited by Mokyr, Joel, 1–51. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. “The New Economic History and the Industrial Revolution.” In The British Industrial Revolution. An Economic Perspective, edited by Mokyr, Joel, 1–131. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Stephen. “British Economic Performance and Total Factor Productivity Growth, 1870–1940.” Economic History Review 38, 4 (1985): 576–82. P.R.O. (Kew) Rail 883–189.Google Scholar
Phelps, Brown E. H., and Browne, Sheila V.. “Labor Hours: Hours of Work.” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 7 (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney. “Labour in Great Britain.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. 7: The Industrial Economies: Capital, Labour, and Enterprise, edited by Mathias, Peter and Postan, Michael, 97–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Reid, Douglas. “The Decline of St. Monday, 1776–1876.” Past and Present 71 (1976): 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, John. The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth Century Industry. London: St. Martin's, 1981.Google Scholar
Rule, John. The Labouring Classes in Early Industrial England 1750–1850. London and New York: Longman, 1986.Google Scholar
Schwarz, L. D. “The Standard of Living in the Long Run: London, 1700–1860.” Economic History Review 38, 1 (1985): 24–41.Google Scholar
Schwarz, L. D.London in the Age of Industrialization: Entrepreneurs, Labour Force, and Living Conditions, 1700–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Richard, and Temin, Peter. “The Inputs for Growth.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. 7: The Industrial Economies: Capital, Labour, and Enterprise, edited by Mathias, Peter and Postan, Michael, 1–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past and Present 38 (1967): 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voth, Hans-Joachim. “Why Did Working Hours Increase in Eighteenth-Century London? Labour Supply Decisions and Consumer Durables During the Industrial Revolution.” University of Oxford Discussion Paper in Social and Economic History, no. 8 (1996).Google Scholar