Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:14:05.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responding to the First Era of Globalization: Canadian Trade Policy, 1870–1913

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2019

Patrick D. Alexander
Affiliation:
Patrick Alexander is Senior Economist, Bank of Canada, 234 Wellington Street, Ottawa ON. E-mail: [email protected]
Ian Keay
Affiliation:
Ian Keay is Professor, Queen’s University, 94 University Avenue, Kingston ON. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this article we document Canada’s trade policy response to late nineteenth and early twentieth century globalization by linking newly digitized annual productspecific data on the value of Canadian imports and duties paid from 1870–1913, to establishment-specific production and location information drawn from the manuscripts of the 1871 industrial census. We find evidence of a highly selective move towards protectionism following the adoption of the National Policy in 1879. Changes in the Canadian tariff schedule narrowly targeted manufactured import products that had close substitutes produced by relatively large, urban, politically influential domestic manufacturers.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Economic History Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors thank seminar participants at the 2016, 2017, and 2018 CEA Annual Meetings, Carleton University, and the Université de Montréal for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. Frank Lewis, Eugene Beaulieu, Jevan Cherniwchan, and Alexander Chernoff generously provided data and support for this project. Katrina Brazzell, Bill Dorval, Hannah Keay, and Xiangtao Meng contributed excellent research assistance. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and may differ from official Bank of Canada views. No responsibility for them should be attributed to the bank. The authors accept responsibility for all remaining errors and omissions.

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Patrick D., and Ian, Keay. “A General Equilibrium Analysis of Canada’s National Policy.Explorations in Economic History 68, no. 1 (2018): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Patrick D., and Ian, Keay. “Replication: Responding to the First Era of Globalization: Canadian Trade Policy, 1870–1913.Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-05-27. https://doi.org/10.3886/E109941V1Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Eugene, and Herbert, Emery. “Pork Packers, Reciprocity, and Laurier’s Defeat in the 1911 Canadian General Election.Journal of Economic History 61, no. 4 (2001): 1083–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, Eugene, and Jevan, Cherniwchan. “Tariff Structure, Trade Expansion, and Canadian Protectionism, 1870–1910.Canadian Journal of Economics 47, no. 1 (2014): 144–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, Richard E.Economic Models of Political Choice: Canada’s Tariff Structure.Canadian Journal of Economics 9, no. 2 (1976): 278300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Samuel D. Canadian Manufacturers’ Association: A Study in Collective Bargaining and Political Pressure. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Corden, Warner M.The Structure of a Tariff System and the Effective Protective Rate.Journal of Political Economy 74, no. 3 (1966): 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, John H. The Protective Tariff in Canada’s Development. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, William T., and Hugh Aitken, G.J. Canadian Economic History. Toronto: Macmillan, 1956.Google Scholar
Easton, Stephen T., William, A. Gibson, and Clyde, G. Reed. “Tariffs and Growth: The Dales Hypothesis.Explorations in Economic History 25, no. 2 (1988): 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowke, Vernon C.The National Policy: Old and New.Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 18, no. 3 (1952): 271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawande, Kishore, and Pravin, Krishna. “The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Empirical Approaches.” In Handbook of International Trade, Volume 1, edited by Harrigan, James and Kwan Choi, E., 131–95. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Gawande, Kishore, and Usree, Bandyopadhyay. “Is Protection for Sale? Evidence on the Grossman–Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection.Review of Economics and Statistics 82, no. 1 (2000): 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, W. Irwin. Tax, Borrow and Spend: Financing Federal Spending in Canada, 1867–1990. Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Pinelopi K., and Giovanni Maggi. “Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation.American Economic Review 89, no. 5 (1999): 1135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. “Protection for Sale.American Economic Review 84, no. 4 (1994): 833–50.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard.Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Small Open Economies with Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition.American Economic Review 74, no. 5 (1984): 1016–33.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard, Ian, Keay, and Frank, D. Lewis. “Protecting Infant Industries: Canadian Manufacturing and the National Policy, 1870–1913.Explorations in Economic History 56, no. 1 (2015): 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helleiner, Gerald K.The Political Economy of Canada’s Tariff Structure: An Alternative Model.Canadian Journal of Economics 10, no. 2 (1977): 318–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstmann, Ignatius, and James, Markusen. “Up the Average Cost Curve: Inefficient Entry and the New Protectionism.Journal of International Economics 20, no. 3 (1986): 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Kris, and Ian, Keay. “Diverse Paths to Industrial Development: Evidence from Late Nineteenth Century Canada.European Review of Economic History 16, no. 3 (2012): 311–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Kris, and Ian, Keay. “Trade Policy and Industrial Development: Iron and Steel in a Small Open Economy, 1870–1913.Canadian Journal of Economics 46, no. 4 (2013): 1265–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A.Trade Restrictiveness and Deadweight Losses from U.S. Tariffs.American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2, no. 3 (2010): 111–33.Google Scholar
Keay, Ian.Protection for Maturing Industries: Evidence from Canadian Trade Patterns and Trade Policy, 1870–1913.Canadian Journal of Economics 52, no. 4 (2019): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kee, Hiau Looi, Alessandro, Nicita, and Marcelo, Olarreaga. “Import Demand Elasticities and Trade Distortions.Review of Economics and Statistics 90, no. 4 (2008): 666–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, Markus.Explaining Nineteenth Century Bilateralism: Economic and Political Determinants of the Cobden-Chevalier Network.Economic History Review 64, no. 2 (2011): 644–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, Markus, and Paul, Sharp. “Tariffs and Income: A Time Series Analysis for 24 Countries.Cliometrica 7, no. 1 (2013): 207–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Sibylle H.The German Elections in the 1870s: Why Germany Turned from Liberalism to Protectionism.Journal of Economic History 70, no. 1 (2010): 146–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Sibylle H., and Kevin, H. O’Rourke. “The Structure of Protection and Growth in the Late Nineteenth Century.Review of Economics and Statistics 93, no. 2 (2011): 606–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, Wiliam L., and Donald, G. Paterson. Canada: An Economic History. Toronto: MacMillan, 1980.Google Scholar
McDiarmid, Orville J. Commercial Policy in the Canadian Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, Marc, and Daniel, Trefler. “Gains from trade when Firms Matter.Journal of Economic Perspectives 26, no. 2 (2012): 91118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, Kenneth, Douglas, Owram, and Herbert Emery, J.C.. A History of the Canadian Economy, Fourth Edition. Toronto: Thomson-Nelson, 2008.Google Scholar
Pomfret, Richard W. The Economic Development of Canada. Toronto: Nelson, 1993.Google Scholar
Porritt, Edward. Sixty Years of Protection in Canada: Where Industry Leans on the Politician. Toronto: Macmillan, 1908.Google Scholar
Roodman, David, James, G. MacKinnon, Morten, O. Nielsen, and Matthew, Webb. “Fast and Wild: Bootstrap Inference in Stata Using boottest.” QED Working Paper No. 1406, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, 2018.Google Scholar
Saunders, Ronald S.The Political Economy of Effective Tariff Protection in Canada’s Manufacturing Sector.Canadian Journal of Economics 13, no. 2 (1980): 340–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taussig, Frank W. Tariff History of the United States, Eighth Edition. New York: G.P. Putnam, 1931.Google Scholar
Trefler, Daniel.Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy.Journal of Political Economy 101, no. 1 (1993): 138–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urquhart, Malcolm C. Gross National Product of Canada, 1870–1926: Derivation of the Estimates. Montreal: Queen’s McGill Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Alexander and Keay supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Alexander and Keay supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 169.1 KB