Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:07:34.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Railways and Price Convergence in British India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2010

Tahir Andrabi  and
Michael Kuehlwein
Tahir Andrabi*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711. E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected].
Michael Kuehlwein*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711. E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The period 1861 to 1920 witnessed sharp price convergence in British Indian grain markets. Previous research attributed this to the construction of railways. But tests examining price differences between districts provide surprisingly weak support for that hypothesis. Railways mattered, but seem capable of explaining only about 20 percent of the decline in price dispersion. One explanation may be that India was a partially integrated economy at the time of railroad expansion. Lines connecting districts on preexisting trade routes had very small price effects. There is also some evidence of a “border effect” on lines between British India and princely states.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 351 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, and Johnson, Simon. “Unbundling Institutions.” Journal of Political Economy 113, no. 5 (2005): 949–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, John, and West, Robert Craig. “Money, Prices, and Economic Development in India, 1861–1895.” The Journal of Economic History 39, no. 1 (1979): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Administration Report on the Railways in India for Calendar Year 1910. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1911.Google Scholar
Andrabi, Tahir, and Kuehlwein, Michael. “Railways and Price Convergence in British India.” SSRN Working Paper, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=1442013.Google Scholar
Bell, Horace.Railway Policy in India. London: Rivington, Percival, and Co., 1894.Google Scholar
Berry, Thomas.Western Prices Before 1861. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Chandigarh Tribune. Online Edition, December 22, 2003. Available at www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20031222/agro.htm.Google Scholar
Coleman, Andrew. “Storage, Slow Transport, and the Law of One Price: Evidence from the Nineteenth-Century U.S. Corn Market.” Research Seminar in International Economics Discussion Paper No. 502, Gerald Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2005.Google Scholar
Collins, William.“Labor Mobility, Market Integration, and Wage Convergence in Late-Nineteenth-Century India.” Explorations in Economic History 36, no. 3 (1999): 246–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Arthur.“Indian Railways and Indian Wheat.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 48, no. 2 (1885): 236–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul.“The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox.” American Economic Review 80, no. 2 (1990): 355–61.Google Scholar
Department of Statistics. India. Prices and Wages in India. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, 1896 and 1922.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, I. D.“Economic Change and the Railways in North India, 1860–1914.” Modern Asian Studies 21, no. 2 (1987): 521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobado, Rafael and Marrero, Gustavo. “Corn Market Integration in Porfirian Mexico.” The Journal of Economic History 65, no. 1 (2005): 103–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition.Online version, http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/. London: Cambridge University Press, 1911.Google Scholar
Engel, Charles, and Rogers, John. “How Wide is the Border?” American Economic Review 86, no. 5 (1996): 1112–25.Google Scholar
Engel, Charles, Rogers, John, and Wang, Shing-Yi. “Revisiting the Border: An Assessment of the Law of One Price Using Very Disaggregated Consumer Price Data.” International Finance Discussion Papers No. 777, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC, September 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremdling, Rainer.“Railroads and German Economic Growth: A Leading Sector Analysis with a Comparison to the United States and Great Britain.” The Journal of Economic History 37, no. 3 (1977): 583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Suresh C.“The Utilitarianism of Dalhousie and the Material Improvement of India.” Modern Asian Studies 12, no. 1 (1978): 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Reuven, and Rose, Andrew. “Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time Series Evidence.” European Economic Review 46, no. 6 (2002): 1125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, Michael, and Margo, Robert. “Railroads and Local Economic Development: The United States in the 1850s.” NBER Working Paper No. 12381, Cambridge, MA, July 2006.Google Scholar
Hurd, John II.“Railways and the Expansion of Markets in India, 1861–1921.” Explorations in Economic History 12, no. 3 (1975): 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, John II. “Railways.” In Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 2: c. 1757–1970, edited by Kumar, D. and Desai, M., 737–61. London: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacks, David.“What Drove Nineteenth-Century Commodity Market Integration?” Explorations in Economic History 43, no. 3 (2006): 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lew, B., and Cater, B.. “The Telegraph, Coordination of Tramp Shipping, and the Growth of World Trade, 1870–1910.” European Review of Economic History 10, no. 2 (2006): 147–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, W. J.“Investment in Indian Railways, 1845–1875.” The Economic History Review 8, no. 2 (1955): 177–86.Google Scholar
McAlpin, Michelle.“Railroads, Prices, and Peasant Rationality: India, 1860–1900.” The Journal of Economic History 34, no. 3 (1974): 662–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpin, Michelle.“Dearth, Famine, and Risk: The Changing Impact of Crop Failures in Western India, 1870–1920.” The Journal of Economic History 39, no. 1 (1979): 143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpin, Michelle. “Price Movements and Fluctuations in Economic Activity (1860–1947).” In Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 2: c. 1757–1970, edited by Kumar, D. and Desai, M., 878–904. London: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzer, Jacob.“Railroad Development and Market Integration: The Case of Tsarist Russia.” The Journal of Economic History 34, no. 3 (1974): 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Railways, Government of India. History of Indian Railways. Calcutta: Government of India Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Moris, Moris D.“Towards a Reinterpretation of Nineteenth-Century Indian Economic History.” The Journal of Economic History 23, no. 4 (1963): 606–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Mukul.“Railways and Their Impact on Bengal’s Economy, 1870–1920.” Indian Economic Social History Review 17, no. 2 (1980): 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, Kevin, and Williamson, Jeffrey. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Gyan.Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, Sarah J.“Court-Ordered Desegregation: Successes and Failures in Integration Since Brown vs. Board of Education.” Journal of Human Resources 40, no. 3 (2005): 559–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Matthew.“Does Trade Liberalization Converge Factor Prices? Evidence from the Antebellum Transportation Revolution.” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 10, no. 3 (2001): 339–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Abstract Relating to British India from 1840 to 1865. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1867.Google Scholar
Statistical Abstract Relating to British India from 1867/8 to 1876/7. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1878.Google Scholar
Studer, Roman.“India and the Great Divergence: Assessing the Efficiency of Grain Markets in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century India.” The Journal of Economic History 68, no. 2 (2008): 393–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar