Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:05:28.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intergenerational Occupational Mobility across Three Continents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2019

Santiago Pérez
Santiago Pérez*
Affiliation:
Santiago Pérez is Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of California, Davis, 1116 Social Sciences and Humanities, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I compare rates of intergenerational occupational mobility across four countries in the late nineteenth century: 1869–1895 Argentina, 1850–1880 United States, 1851–1881 Britain, and 1865–1900 Norway. Argentina and the United States had similar levels of intergenerational mobility, and these levels were above those of Britain and Norway. These findings suggest that the higher mobility of nineteenth-century United States relative to Britain might not have been a reflection of “American exceptionalism,” but rather a manifestation of more widespread differences between settler economies of the New World and Europe.

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 383 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article was part of my dissertation completed at Stanford University. I thank my advisor Ran Abramitzky, as well as Arun Chandrasekhar, Victor Lavy, Melanie Morten, and Gavin Wright for outstanding guidance as part of my dissertation committee. I also thank the editor and two anonymous referees for valuable feedback. I have benefitted from feedback from seminar participants at the University of Arizona, PUC Chile, and UC Davis. I acknowledge the financial support of the Stanford University Economics Department, the Economic History Association, the Stanford Center for International Development, and the Leonard W. Ely and Shirley R. Ely Graduate Student Fund Fellowship.

References

REFERENCES

Abramitzky, Ran, Roy, Mill, and Santiago, Pérez. “Linking Individuals Across Historical Sources: A Fully Automated Approach.” NBER Working Paper No. 24324, Cambridge, MA, October 2018.Google Scholar
Adelman, Jeremy. Frontier Development: Land, Labour, and Capital on the Wheatlands of Argentina and Canada, 1890–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Eliana, La Ferrara. “Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities.” Journal of Public Economics 89, no. 5 (2005): 897–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Stefanie, Stantcheva, and Edoardo, Teso. “Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution.” American Economic Review 108, no. 2 (2018): 521–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altham, Patricia M.E. “The Measurement of Association of Rows and Columns for an R S Contingency Table.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 32, no. 1 (1970): 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Martha, Connor, Cole, Morgan, Henderson, et al. “How Well Do Automated Linking Methods Perform in Historical Samples? Evidence from New Ground Truth.” NBER Working Paper No. 24019, Cambridge, MA, November 2017.Google Scholar
Bazzi, Samuel, Martin, Fiszbein, and Mesay, Gebresilasse. “Frontier Culture: The Roots and Persistence of ‘Rugged Individualism’ in the United States.” NBER Working Paper No. 23997, Cambridge, MA, November 2017.Google Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, and Efe, A. Ok. “Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 2 (2001): 447–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yuyu, Suresh, Naidu, Tinghua, Yu, et al. “Intergenerational Mobility and Institutional Change in Twentieth Century China.” Explorations in Economic History 58 (2015): 44–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel, Hendren, Patrick, Kline, et al. “Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, no. 4 (2014a): 1553–623.Google Scholar
Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel, Hendren, Patrick, Kline, et al. “Is the United States Still a Land of Opportunity? Recent Trends in Intergenerational Mobility.” American Economic Review 104, no. 5 (2014b): 141–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilliers, Jeanne, and Johan, Fourie. “Social Mobility During South Africa’s Industrial Take-Off.” South African Journal of Economics 86.1 (2018): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregory. The Son Also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory, and Anthony, Clark. “Common Rights to Land in England, 1475–1839.” Journal of Economic History 61, no. 4 (2001): 1009–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conde, Roberto Cortés. “El Progreso Argentino: 1880–1914.” ed. Sudamericana, , 1979.Google Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas F.R. “Patterns of Development in Nineteenth Century Europe.” Oxford Economic Papers 36, no. 3 (1984): 438–58.Google Scholar
Dempster, Arthur P., Nan, M. Laird, and Donald, B. Rubin. “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 39, no. 1 (1977): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. Vol. 10. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1835.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., and Kenneth, L. Sokoloff. “Once Upon a Time in the Americas: Land and Immigration Policies in the New World.” In Understanding Long-Run Economic Growth: Geography, Institutions, and the Knowledge Economy, 13–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, James J. “Multiple Measures of Historical Intergenerational Mobility: Iowa 1915 to 1940.” Economic Journal, forthcoming 2017.Google Scholar
Ferrie, Joseph. “Migration to the Frontier in Mid-Nineteenth Century America: A Re-Examination of Turner’s ‘Safety Valve’.” Mimeo, 1997.Google Scholar
Fuente, Diego Gregorio de la. Primer Censo de La República Argentina: Verificado En Los Dias 15, 16 Y 17 de Setiembre de 1869. Impr. del Porvenir, 1872.Google Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy W. “The Historical Fertility Transition: A Guide for Economists.” Journal of Economic Literature 49, no. 3 (2011): 589–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton, Timothy J., and Jeffrey, G. Williamson. The Age of Mass Migration: Causes and Economic Impact. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy. The Landowners of the Argentine Pampas: A Social and Political History 1860–1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy. “La Evolución de La Desigualdad En La Argentina Del Siglo XIX: Una Agenda En Construcción.” Desarrollo Económico 47, no. 187 (2007): 487–501.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy, and Leandro, Losada. “Clases altas y medias en la Argentina, 1880–1930. Notas para una agenda de investigación.” Desarrollo Económico 50, no. 200 (2011): 611–630.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Jan O., David, B. Grusky, Reinhard, Pollak, et al. “Occupations and Social Mobility: Gradational, Big-Class, and Micro-Class Reproduction in Comparative Perspective.” In Persistence, Privilege, and Parenting: The Comparative Study of Intergenerational Mobility, edited by Timothy, M. Smeeding, Robert, Erikson, and Markus, Jäntti, 138–72. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011.Google Scholar
Krueger, Alan. “The Rise and Consequences of Inequality.” Presentation made to the Center for American Progress, 12 January 2012. Available at http://www.Americanprogress.Org/Events/2012/01/12/17181/the-Rise-and-Consequences-of-Inequality.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, M. H. D. van, Ineke Maas, and Andrew, Miles. HISCO: Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H. Growing Public: Volume 1, the Story: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century. Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H., and Jeffrey, G. Williamson. Unequal Gains: American Growth and Inequality Since 1700. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Long, Jason, and Ferrie, Joseph. “The Path to Convergence: Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Britain and the United States in Three Eras.” Economic Journal 117, no. 519 (2007): C61–C71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Jason, and Ferrie, Joseph. “Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States Since 1850.” American Economic Review 103, no. 4 (2013): 1109–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Jason, and Ferrie, Joseph. “Grandfathers Matter (Ed): Occupational Mobility Across Three Generations in the United States and Britain, 1850–1911.” Economic Journal 128, no. 612 (2018): F422–F445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Rockville, MD: Wildside Press LLC, 2008.Google Scholar
Mill, Roy, and Luke, C. D. Stein. “Race, Skin Color, and Economic Outcomes in Early Twentieth-Century America.” Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, December 2012.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan, and Samuel, Berrick Saul. The Economic Development of Continental Europe 1780–1870. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modalsli, Jørgen. “Intergenerational Mobility in Norway, 1865–2011.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 119, no. 1 (2017): 34–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivetti, Claudia, and Daniele Paserman, M.. “In the Name of the Son (and the Daughter): Intergenerational Mobility in the United States, 1850–1940.” American Economic Review 105, no. 8 (2015): 2695–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parman, John. “American Mobility and the Expansion of Public Education.” Journal of Economic History 71, no. 1 (2011): 105–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Santiago. “The (South) American Dream: Mobility and Economic Outcomes of First-and Second-Generation Immigrants in Nineteenth-Century Argentina.” Journal of Economic History 77, no. 4 (2017): 971–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Santiago. “Replication files for ‘Intergenerational Occupational Mobility Across Three Continents.’ ” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019. https://doi.org/10.3886/E108367V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. “Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, no. 3 (1995): 551–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Evan, Roberts, Sula, Sarkar, et al. “The North Atlantic Population Project: Progress and Prospects.” Historical Methods 44, no. 1 (2011): 1–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., and Stanley, L. Engerman. “History Lessons: Institutions, Factors Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, no. 3 (2000): 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, Gary. “Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States.” American Economic Review 82, no. 3 (1992): 393–408.Google Scholar
Solon, Gary. “Cross-Country Differences in Intergenerational Earnings Mobility.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, no. 3 (2002): 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, Gary. “A Model of Intergenerational Mobility Variation over Time and Place.” In Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe, edited by Miles, Corak, 38–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, Gary. “What Do We Know so Far About Multigenerational Mobility?” NBER Working Paper No. 21053, Cambridge, MA, March 2015.Google Scholar
Somoza, Jorge L. Muestras de Los Dos Primeros Censos Nacionales de Población, 1869 Y 1895. 46. Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Centro de Investigaciones Sociales, 1967.Google Scholar
Taylor, Alan M. “Latifundia as Malefactor in Economic Development? Scale, Tenancy, and Agriculture on the Pampas, 1880–1914.” NBER Historical Working Paper No. 96, Cambridge, MA, March 1997.Google Scholar
Taylor, Alan M., and Jeffrey, G. Williamson. “Convergence in the Age of Mass Migration.” European Review of Economic History 1, no. 1 (1997): 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. “Latin American Inequality: Colonial Origins, Commodity Booms, or a Missed Twentieth Century Leveling?” NBER Working Paper No. 20915, Cambridge, MA, January 2015.Google Scholar
Winkler, William E. “Using the EM Algorithm for Weight Computation in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 667–671. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1988.Google Scholar
Winkler, William E. “String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage.” ERIC No. ED325505, Education Resources Information Center, Washington, DC, 1990.Google Scholar
Xie, Yu, and Alexandra, Killewald. “Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States Since 1850: Comment.” American Economic Review 103, no. 5 (2013): 2003–20.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pérez supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Pérez supplementary material(File)
File 118.1 KB