Article contents
Historical Aspects of Imperfect Competition
Theory and History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2011
Extract
Operating theories are more or less concealed in the structure of all historical writing. They are readily discerned when the theories are comprehensive and at variance with generally accepted ideas, as in the case of Thomism or Marxism. They are hard to detect when like Spencerianism they conform closely to the mores of American life. Writers may honestly deny in this latter case that they have any special theory; they are simply recording the “facts” from a “common-sense” viewpoint. But since theory must be either implicit or explicit, it is better for scholarly purposes that it should be explicit. Carefully formulated theory restricts unconscious bias, gives meaning to otherwise formless data, and is more likely to reveal unexpected relationships.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1943
References
1 Robinson, Joan, The Economics of Imperfect Competition (London: Macmillan and Company, 1933), 327.Google Scholar
2 Chamberlin, Edward, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Third Edition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938), 146.Google Scholar
3 Chamberlin, 81–82.
4 Chamberlin, 109.
5 Chamberlin, 166.
6 Chamberlin, 175–176.
7 Robinson, 3–4.
8 Clark, J. M., “Toward a Concept of Workable Competition,” American Economic Review, XXX (1940), 242.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by