Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:00:36.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government versus Bankers: Sovereign Debt Negotiations in Porfirian Mexico, 1888–1910

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2015

Leonardo Weller Open the ORCID record for Leonardo Weller [Opens in a new window]
Leonardo Weller*
Affiliation:
Leonardo Weller is Assistant Professor, São Paulo School of Economics (EESP-FGV), Rua Itapeva 474, sala 1019, São Paulo, SP, 01332-000, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article assesses how the government of Porfirio Díaz (1876–1910) negotiated sovereign loans. Mexico was a serial defaulter that established a good reputation and issued bonds abroad at progressively better conditions. Based on new archival material, the article demonstrates that borrowing terms improved not only because of sounder fundamentals, but also due to the efforts of high officials to negotiate with debt underwriters. The Mexicans never accepted a patron bank and used the offers from American banks to bargain with European competitors. They acted according to the government's reputation, the underwriters' status, and the ideology of the Porfirian state.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 1030 - 1057
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I benefited from the thoughtful comments given by Colin Lewis, Stephen Haber, Rui Esteves, Carlos Brando, Joe Francis, Coskun Tuncer, the editor and referees of this Journal, and the participants of the 2013 Economic History Society Conference and the 2014 Congreso Latinoamericano de Historia Económica. I also thank Leonor Ludlow, Paolo Riguzzi, and Alma Parra for generously helping me during my field research in Mexico City. This research has been financed by the Council for Higher Education of the Brazilian Government (CAPES).

References

REFERENCES

Bordo, Michael D., and Rockoff, Hugh. “The Gold Standard as a Housekeeping Seal of Approval.” Journal of Economic History 56, no. 2 (1996): 389–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmagnani, Marcello. La Economía Pública del Liberalismo Mexicano, 1850–1911. Mexico City: Colégio de México, 1994.Google Scholar
Carosso, P. Vincent, and Sylla, Richard. “U.S. Banks in the International Finance.” In International Banking: 1870–1914, edited by Cameron, Rondo and Bovykin, V. I., 48–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Casteloe, Michel P. Bonds and Bondholders: British Investors and Mexico's Foreign Debt, 1824–1888. Westport: Praeger, 2003.Google Scholar
Catão, Luís. “Mexico and Export-Led Growth: The Porfirian Period Revisited.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 22, no. 1 (1998): 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, Kenneth S. “Porfirian Investment Policies.” Mimeo, PhD thesis, University of New Mexico, 1978.Google Scholar
Economist, 26 March 1898 .Google Scholar
Ficker, Sandra K. “Nuevas Series del Comercio Exterior de México.” Revista de História Económica 20, no. 2 (2002): 213–70.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “Bonds and Brands: Foundations of the Sovereign Debt Markets, 1820–1830.” Journal of Economic History 69, no. 3 (2009): 646–84.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “Hamlet Without the Prince of Denmark: Relationship Banking and Conditionality Lending in the London Market for Foreign Government Debt, 1815–1913.” Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Working Paper No. 8, 2010.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “Bondholders vs. Bondsellers? Investment Banks and Conditionality Lending in the London Market for Foreign Government Debt, 1815–1913.” European Historical Economic Society Working Paper No. 2, 2011.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Flores, Juan H.. “The Peaceful Conspiracy: Bond Markets and International Relations During the Pax Britannica.” International Organization 66, no. 2 (2012): 211–41.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, and Frédéric , Zumer. The Making of Global Finance 1880–1913. Paris: OECD, 2004.Google Scholar
Flandreau, Marc, Flores, Juan H., Gaillard, Norbert, et al. . “The Changing Role of Global Financial Brands in the Underwriting of Foreign Government Debt (1815–2010).” Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Working Paper No. 15, 2011.Google Scholar
Flores, Juan H. “Competition in the Underwriting Markets of Sovereign Debt: The Baring Crisis Revisited.” Law and Contemporary Problems 73, no. 4 (2010): 129–50.Google Scholar
Flores, Juan H. “Fundamentos Económicos, Fallos de Mercado y Exportación de Capitales: América y el Mercado de Londres, 1880–1913.” América Latina en la Historia Económica 19, no. 3 (2011): 5–30.Google Scholar
Flores, Juan H. “Economic Fundamentals, Market Failures and Capital Exports: Latin America and the Market of London, 1880–1913.” América Latina en la Historia Económica 39, no. 3 (2012): 5–30.Google Scholar
Gruntein, Arturo. “Surgimiento de los Ferrocarriles Nacionales de México (1900–1913): Era Inevitable la Consolidación Monopólica?” In Historia de las Grandes Empresas en México, 1850–1930, edited by Marichal, Carlos and Cerutti, M., 65–106. Mexico City: Fundo de Cultura Económica, 1997.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen, Razo, Armando, and Maurer, Noel. The Politics of Property Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
“Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática”. Estadísticas Históricas de México. Mexico City: INEGI, 2000.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Leonor. “El Banco Nacional de México y el Banco Mercantil Mexicano: radiografía social de sus primeros accionistas, 1881–1882.” Historia Mexicana 39, no. 4 (1990): 979–1027.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Leonor, and Marichal, Carlos. “La Deuda Pública en México en el Siglo XIX: el Tránsito Hacia la Modernidad.” In Un Siglo de Deuda Pública en México, edited by Ludlow, Leonor and Marichal, C., 7–24. Mexico City: Instituto Mora, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marichal, Carlos. “El Manejo de la Deuda Pública y la Crisis Financiera de 1884–1885.” In Los Negocios y las Ganancias de la Colonia al México Moderno, edited by Ludlow, Leonor and Silva, R., 419–44. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigadores Dr. José María Luis Mora, 1993.Google Scholar
Marichal, Carlos. “Foreign Loan, Banks and Capital Markets in Mexico, 1880–1910.” In La Deuda Pública en América Latina en Perspectiva Histórica, edited by Liehr, Reinhald, 338–367. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert, 1995.Google Scholar
Maurer, Noel. The Power and the Money: The Mexican Financial System, 1876–1932. Sanford University Press: Stanford, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, Paolo, Sussman, Nathan, and Yafeh, Yafeh. Emerging Markets and Financial Globalization: Sovereign Bond Spreads in 1870–1913 and Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mitchener, Kris J., and Weidenmier, Mark. “The Baring Crisis and the Great Latin American Meltdown of the 1890s.” Journal of Economic History 68, no. 2 (2008): 462–500.Google Scholar
Officer, Lawrence H., and Williamson, Samuel H.. “The Price of Gold, 1257 – Present.” MeasuringWorth, 2015. http://www.measuringworth.com/gold/.Google Scholar
Passananti, Thomas. “Conflicto y Cooperación Financiera en la Belle Époque: Bancos Alemanes en el Porfiriato Tardio.” In México y la Economía Atlántica, Siglos XVIII–XX, edited by Ficker, Sandra K. and Pietschmann, H., 173–203. Mexico City: Colegio de México, 2006.Google Scholar
Passananti, Thomas. “‘Nada de Papeluchos!’ Managing Globalization in Early Porfirian Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 42, no. 3 (2007): 101–28.Google Scholar
Passananti, Thomas. “Dynamizing the Economy in a Façon Irréguliére: A New Look at Financial Politics in Porfirian Mexico.” Mexican Studies 24, no. 1 (2008): 1–29.Google Scholar
Riguzzi, Paolo. “From Globalisation to Revolution? The Porfirian Political Economy: An Essay on Issues and Interpretations.” Journal of Latin American Studies 41, no. 2 (2009): 347–68.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Fernando. “El Desarrollo Económico de México de 1877 a 1911.” In Historia Económica de México, edited by Cárdenas, Enrique, 43–67. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1992.Google Scholar
Russell, Philip L. The History of Mexico: From Pre-Conquest to Present. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Salvucci, Richard J. Politics, Markets, and Mexico's ‘London Debt,’ 1823–1887. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. Colección de Leyes y Disposiciones Relacionadas con la Deuda Exterior de México. Clásicos de la Economía Mexicana. Mexico City: UNAM, 1989.Google Scholar
Stein, Fritz. Gold and Iron: Bismarck, Bleichroeder, and the Building of the German Empire. London: Allen and Unwin, 1980.Google Scholar
Stelo, María E. R. “Patrón Oro y Estabilidad Cambiaria en México, 1905–1910.” América Latina en la Historia Económica 32 (2009): 81–109.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Toshio. Japanese Government Loan Issues in the London Capital Market 1870–1913. London: Athlone, 1994.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Topik, Steven C. “Controversia Crediticia: los ‘Azulitos' del Periodo de Maximiliano.” In Los Negocios y las Ganancias de la Colonia al México Moderno, edited by Ludlow, Leonor and Silva, R., 445–70. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigadores Dr. José María Luis Mora, 1993.Google Scholar
Topik, Steven C. “When Mexico Had the Blues: A Transatlantic Tale of Bonds, Bankers and Nationalists, 1862–1910.” American Historical Review 105, no. 3 (2000): 714–38.Google Scholar
Weiner, Richard. “Battle for Survival: Porfirian Views of the International Marketplace.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32, no. 1 (2000): 645–70.Google Scholar