Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:19:05.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamics of Relief Spending and the Private Urban Labor Market During the New Deal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

Todd C. Neumann ,
Price V. Fishback  and
Shawn Kantor
Todd C. Neumann*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, University of California, Merced, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343. E-mail: [email protected]. National Bureau of Economics
Price V. Fishback*
Affiliation:
Frank and Clara Kramer Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. E-mail: [email protected]. National Bureau of Economics
Shawn Kantor*
Affiliation:
County Bank Professor of Economics, University of California, Merced, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343. E-mail: [email protected]. National Bureau of Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the dynamic relationships between relief spending and local private labor markets using a panel data set of relief, private employment, and private earnings. Positive shocks to relief during the First New Deal were followed by increased private employment and earnings, consistent with demand stimulus in that period. On the other hand, increases in work relief spending during the Second New Deal were followed by decreased employment and increased earnings, consistent with crowding out. The timing of spending is consistent with claims that the Roosevelt administration used relief spending to sway elections.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 195 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, Sam, and Yocum, James C.. Ohio Business Data, 1926–1948, in charts and tables Columbus: Ohio University State Bureau of Business Research, 1949Google Scholar
Bakke, E. Wight. The Unemployed Worker: A Study of the Task of Making a Living Without a Job Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1969 [1940]. Reprint.Google Scholar
Bernanke, Ben S. “Employment, Hours, and Earnings in the Depression: An Analysis of Eight Manufacturing Industries.” The American Economic Review 76, no. 1(1986): 82–109.Google Scholar
Blumberg, BarbaraThe New Deal and the Unemployed: The View from New York City Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1978Google Scholar
Brimhall, Dean M. “Alleged Labor Shortages During Periods of Large Government Spending for Relief.” Draft of Internal Memo, April 30, 1937. WPA Records. Records of the Statistics Division, Entry 27, Box 40, National Archives II in College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
Brown, Josephine Chapin. Public Relief, 1929–1939. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1940.Google Scholar
Coyle, David Cushman “The WPA—Loafers or Workers?” Reprint from Forum and Century. March 1939, no page numbers listed. WPA Records. Records of the Statistics Division, Entry 27, Box 40, National Archives II in College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
Darby, Michael R. “Three-and-a-Half Million U.S. Employees Have Been Mislaid: or, an Explanation of Unemployment, 1934–1941.” Journal of Political Economy 84, no. 1(1976): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Works Agency Works Projects Administration. Report on Progress of the WPA Program Washington, DC: GPO, 1940Google Scholar
Fishback, Price V., Haines, Michael R., and Kantor, Shawn “Births, Deaths, and New Deal Relief During the Depression.” Review of Economics and Statistics 89, no. 1(2007): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishback, Price V., Horrace, William C. and Kantor, Shawn “The Impact of New Deal Expenditures on Local Economic Activity: An Examination of Retail Sales, 1929–1939.” This Journal 65, no. 1 (2005): 36–71.Google Scholar
Fishback, Price V., Kantor, Shawn and Wallis, John Joseph “Can the Three R's Be Rehabilitated? A Comprehensive Analysis, Program-by-Program, County-by-County.” Explorations in Economic History 40, no. 3(2003): 278–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Robert K. “The Marginal Effect of New Deal Relief Work on County-Level Unemployment Statistics.” This Journal 59, no. 3 (1999a): 659–87.Google Scholar
Fleck, Robert K. “The Value of the Vote: A Model and Test of the Effects of Turnout on Distributive Policy.” Economic Inquiry 37, no. 4(1999b): 609–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Donald S.The WPA and Federal Relief Policy. New York: Russel Sage, 1943.Google Scholar
Kesselman, Jonathan “Work Relief Programs in the Great Depression.” In Creating Jobs: Public Employment Programs and Wage Subsidies, edited by Palmer, John L.153–229Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1978.Google Scholar
Love, Inessa, and Ziccino, Lea “Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behavior: Evidence from Panel VAR?” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46, no. 2(2005): 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G. S., and Wu, S.. “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and New Simple Test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, no. 4(1999): 631–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margo, Robert A. “Interwar Unemployment in the United States: Evidence from the 1940 Census Sample.” In Interwar Unemployment in International Perspective, edited by Eichengreen, B. and Hatton, T. J.325–52. DordrechtKluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margo, Robert A. “The Microeconomics of Depression Unemployment.” This Journal 51, no. 2 (1991): 333–41.Google Scholar
McJimsey, G. T.Harry Hopkins: Ally of the Poor and Defender of Democracy Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKean, Eugene, and Taylor, HaroldPublic Works and Employment from the Local Government Point of View. A Report of the W. E. Upjohn Institute for Community Research. Chicago: Public Administration Service, 1955.Google Scholar
Millett, John D.The Works Progress Administration in New York City Chicago: Public Administration Service, 1938Google Scholar
Moulton, Harold G. “In Defense of the Longer Work Week.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 184, no. 1(1936): 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Archives II. College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
National Resources Planning Board. Security, Work, and Relief Policies Washington DC: GPO, 1942Google Scholar
Neumann, Todd C., Fishback, Price V., and Kantor, Shawn “The Dynamics of Relief Spending and the Private Urban Labor Market During the New Deal—Extended.” NBER Working Paper No. 13692, Cambridge, MA, December 2007.Google Scholar
Petree, John Reports of the State Director on the Functions of the Various Federal Emergency Agencies in Alabama. Various dates between 1934 and 1937. Office of Government Reports, Record Group 44, National Archives II in College Park, Maryland. Entry 29, Box 392. Periodical Reports of State Directors, 1934–1938.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie Fox. The Civil Works Administration, 1933–1934 Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jason Scott. Building New Deal Liberalism: The Political Economy of Public Works, 1933–1956 New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Sundstrom, William A. “Last Hired, First Fired? Unemployment and Urban Black Workers During the Great Depression.” This Journal 51, no. 2 (1992): 415–29.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, William A. “Did the WPA Displace Private Employment? Evidence from the 1940 Census Manuscripts.” Working paper, Santa Clara University, 1995.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jason “Work-Sharing During the Great Depression: Did the President's Reemployment Agreement Promote Reemployment?” Economica, forthcoming.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment and Earnings Washington, DC: GPO, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment and Payrolls Washington, DC: GPO, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Monthly Labor Statistics Washington, DC: GPO, various issues.Google Scholar
Walker, ForrestThe Civil Works Administration: An Experiment in Federal Work Relief, 1933–1934 New York: Garland Publishing, 1979Google Scholar
Walker, L. C. “The Share-the-Work Movement.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 165, no. 1(1933): 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, John Joseph. “Employment in the Great Depression: New Data and Hypothesis.” Explorations in Economic History 26, no. 1(1981): 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, John Joseph and Daniel, K. Benjamin “Public Relief and Private Employment in the Great Depression.” This Journal 41, no. 2 (1981): 97–102.Google Scholar
Wallis, John Joseph “Private Employment and Public During the Great Depression.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Maryland, 1989.Google Scholar
Wallis, John Joseph, Fishback, Price V., and Kantor, Shawn “Politics, Relief, and Reform: Roosevelt's Efforts to Control Corruption and Political Manipulation During the New Deal.” In Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America's Economic History, edited by Glaeser, Edward and Goldin, Claudia343–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edward A.Federal Aid for Relief New York: AMS Press, 1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Progress Administration. Series of Internal Memos on Labor Shortages with no names attached. WPA Records. Records of the Statistics Division, Entry 27, Box 40, National Archives II in College Park, Maryland, 1937.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin “The Political Economy of New Deal Spending: An Econometric Analysis.” Review of Economics and Statistics 56, no. 1(1974): 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar