Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:18:51.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capitalism and Freedom: Manumissions and the Slave Market in Louisiana, 1725–1820

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2005

SHAWN COLE
SHAWN COLE
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field Road, Boston, MA 02163. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I use a rich new dataset of Louisiana slave records to answer long-standing questions about manumission. I examine who was manumitted, by whom, and whether manumittees paid prices above market for their freedom, shedding some light on the debate of the efficiency of slavery. Legal changes after the Louisiana Purchase allow us to conclude that manumission laws were quite important in determining the terms at which manumission agreements were struck: when slaves lost the right to sue for self-purchase at market price, there was a precipitous drop in the number of manumissions, while prices paid increased.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 1008 - 1027
Copyright
© 2005 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aimes Hubert. (February 1909): “Coartacion: A Spanish Institution for the Advancement of Slaves into Freedmen.” Yale Review 17 412– 31.Google Scholar
Baade Hans. 1983. “The Law of Slavery in Spanish Luisiana, 1769–1803.” In Louisiana's Legal Heritage, edited by Edward Haas, 45– 86, Pensacola, FL: Perdido Bay Press,
Bergad Laird, Iglesias Garcia, and Maria del Carmen Barcia. 1995. The Cuban Slave Market 1790–1880. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Conrad Alfred H., and John R. Meyer. 1958: “The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South.” Journal of Political Economy 66, no. 2 95– 130.Google Scholar
Conrad Alfred H., and John R. Meyer. 1960: “Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 68, no. 5 187– 89.Google Scholar
Dew Charles. 1994. Bond of Iron: Master and Slave at Buffalo Forge. New York: W.W. Norton,
Goveia Elsa. 1970: “West Indian Slave Laws of the 18th Century.” Chapters in Caribbean History 2, 9– 105.Google Scholar
Fenoaltea Stefano. (1984): “Slavery and Supervision in Comparative Perspective: A Model.” This JOURNAL 44, no. 3 635– 68.Google Scholar
Findlay Ronald. 1975: “Slavery, Incentives, and Manumission: A Theoretical Model.” Journal of Political Economy 83, no. 5 923– 33.Google Scholar
Fogel Robert, and Stanely Engerman. 1974: “Philanthropy at Bargain Prices.” The Journal of Legal Studies 32, no. 2 377– 401.Google Scholar
Goldin Claudia. 1976. Urban Slavery in the American South, 1820–1860: A Quantitative History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
Hall Gwendolyn. 2000. Databases for the Study of Afro-Louisiana. New Orleans: Louisiana State University Press,
Hall Gwendolyn. 2001 Prices of Slaves in Louisiana, 1720–1820. Unpublished Manuscript. New Orleans
Hanger Kimberly. 1997. Bounded Lives, Bounded Places: Free Black Society in Colonial New Orleans. Durham, NC: Duke University Press,
Holland E. C. 1822. A Refutation of the Calumnies Circulated against the Southern and Western States Respecting the Institution and Existence of Slavery among Them. Charleston,
Ingersoll Thomas. 1991: “Free Blacks in a Slave Society.” William and Mary Quarterly 48, no. 2 173– 200.Google Scholar
Knight Franklin. 1970. Slave Society in Cuba During the Nineteenth Century, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,
Kotlikoff Laurence J. 1979: “The Structure of Slave Prices in New Orleans, 1804 to 1862.” Economic Inquiry 17, no. 4 496– 518.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff Laurence J., and Anton Rupert. 1980: “The Manumission of Slaves in New Orleans, 1827–1846.” Southern Studies 19, no. 2 173– 81.Google Scholar
Matison Sumner Eliot. 1948: “Manumission by Self-Purchase.” Journal of Negro History 33, no. 2 146– 67.Google Scholar
McCusker John. 1992. How Much is that in Real Money? Worcester, MA: American Antiquarian Society,
Moes John. 1960: “The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South: Another Comment.” Journal of Political Economy 68, no. 2 183– 87.Google Scholar
Morris Richard. 1954: “The Measure of Bondage in the Slave States.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 42, no. 2 219– 40.Google Scholar
Phillips Ulrich 1940. American Negro Slavery. New York: Appleton-Century Company,
Rubin Donald. B. 1974: “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66, no. 5 688– 701.Google Scholar
Schafer Judith Kelleher. Slavery, the Civil Law, and the Supreme Court of Louisiana
Tadman Michael. 1989. Speculators and Slaves: Masters, Traders, and Slaves in the Old South. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,
Temin Peter. 2004: “The Labor Supply of the Early Roman Empire.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34, no. 4 513– 38.Google Scholar
United States. 1866. “Statistics of the United States, 1860.” Washington, DC: GPO,
Wahl Jenny Bourne. 1997: “Legal Constraints on Slave Masters: The Problem of Social Cost.” American Journal of Legal History 41, no. 1 1– 24.Google Scholar
Wergeland A. M. (1902): “Slavery in Germanic Society During the Middle Ages: III.” Journal of Political Economy 10 230– 54.Google Scholar
Westerman William. 1955. The Slave Systems of Greek and Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society,
Whitman Stephen. 1995: “Diverse Good Causes: Manumission and the Transformation of Urban Slavery.” Social Science History 19, no. 3 333– 70.Google Scholar