Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2009
This article summarizes recent research on the agrarian depression in seventeenth-century Spain, relying primarily upon data from the provinces of Segovia and Toledo. Both regions suffered sustained losses of population and stagnation of production and failed to develop a permanent interior market structure. Due to its reliance upon sheepherding, the Segovian rural economy recovered slightly by the end of the century, but in Toledo, an economy almost entirely dependent upon grain production, demographic and economic indices were negative throughout the entire period.
1 Sanz, Angel García, Desarrollo y crisis del Antiguo Régimen en Castilla la Vieja (Madrid, 1977).Google Scholar
2 de Pison, Eduardo Martínez, ed., Los paisajes naturales de Segovia, Avila, Toledo y Caceres (Madrid, 1977).Google Scholar
3 Sanz, García, Desarrollo y crisis, pp. 112–24;Google ScholarSalomon, N., La campagne de Nouvelle Castille a la fin du XVIe siécle (Paris, 1964), pp. 76–79.Google Scholar
4 Sanz, García, Desarrollo y crisis, pp. 44–52;Google ScholarSalomon, La campagne, pp. 253–302.Google Scholar
5 Lacarra, José, ed., La reconquísta espanola y la repoblacíon del país (Zaragoza, Spain, 1951).Google Scholar
6 The parish archives of Yebenes and Orgaz contain nearly complete baptismal counts from the 1540s. The decennial averages in both parishes nearly doubled between the 1540s and the 1570s, and then increased by nearly 25 percent by the 1590s.Google Scholar
7 Sanz, García, Desarrollo y crisis, pp. 52–53.Google Scholar
8 The census of 1715, which admittedly underestimates actual population, nonetheless shows a decline in Toledo province of more than 25 percent from the figures of 1646. I wish to thank David Ringrose for securing a copy of the 1715 document for me.Google Scholar
9 Sanz, García, Desarrollo y crisis, pp. 94–96.Google Scholar
10 Weisser, Michael, The Peasants of the Montes (Chicago, 1976), chap. 4.Google Scholar
11 Sanz, Garcīa, Desarrollo y crisis, pp. 99–101.Google Scholar
12 Weisser, Peasants, pp. 56–57;Google ScholarSanz, García, Desarrollo y crisis, p. 143.Google Scholar
13 On Toledo see Weisser, Michael, “The Decline of Castile Revisited: The Case of Toledo,” Journal of European Economic History, 3 (Winter, 1973), 214–40;Google Scholar on Segovia see de Leruela, Miguel Caxa, Restauracíon de la abundancia de Espana, ed. LeFlem, Jean-Paul, new edition (Madrid, 1975), especially the introduction.Google Scholar
14 Weisser, Michael, “Les marchands de Tolède dans l'économie castillane, 1565–1635,” Mélanges de la Casa de Velazquez 7 (1971), 223–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Archivo General de Simancas, section: Expedientes de Hacienda, leg. 183.Google Scholar
16 Sanz, García, Desarrollo y crisis, pp. 208–16.Google Scholar Contemporaries in Toledo complained that city artisans could not compete with cheaper products produced in the countryside; cf.de Moncada, Sancho, Restauracíon política de Espana, ed. Vilar, Jean, new edition (Madrid, 1974).Google Scholar
17 Parker, Geoffrey and Smith, Leslie, eds., The General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century (London, 1978).Google Scholar
18 The last word on this question has obviously not been written, but a recent contribution is Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System, Vol. II, Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750 (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
19 Sanz, García, Desarrolo y crisis, pp. 327–38.Google Scholar
20 Phillips, Carla, Ciudad Real, 1500–1750: Growth, Crisis and Readjustment in the Spanish Economy (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1979).Google Scholar
21 Thompson, I. A. A., War and Government in Habsburg Spain, 1560–1620 (London, 1976).Google Scholar