Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2011
There are many accounts of the ‘prebendaries' plot’ of 1543 against archbishop Thomas Cranmer. Some view the event as a counterattack against advancing heresy in Canterbury diocese. Others see a ‘papist’ revolt within Cranmer's own household. Nearly all agree that the plot was a wholly clerical enterprise. They have studied the clergy alone, focusing on the prebendaries' and preachers' activities against their ordinary. Recent accounts have stressed the relationship between the prebendaries' plot and the conflict between Cranmer and bishop Stephen Gardiner. That there was factional strife in the royal council, which could easily focus on religious issues, is not in question here. What is lacking, however, in recent accounts is any consideration of the substantial involvement of a number of Kentish gentlemen and royal officials, although their part in the affair was noted in near-contemporary accounts. By following these traces we may enlarge our understanding of the intrigue of 1543 in the context of Reformation politics at the county level.
page 241 note 1 Typically in Ridley, J., Thomas Cranmer, Oxford 1962, 229–44Google Scholar; a different explanation which also stresses the clergy is Gairdner, J., Lollardy and the Reformation in England, London 1908–1913, ii. 366, or in his preface to Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, of the Reign of Henry VIII (hereafter cited as LP), XVIII. ii.Google Scholar
page 241 note 2 Nichols, J. G., Narratives of the Days of the Reformation (Camden Society, old ser., lxvii (1859), 252–4.Google Scholar
page 242 note 1 William Gardiner alias Sandwich, Arthur St. Leger, Richard Parkhurst, John Miles and William Hadleigh, alias Hunt.
page 242 note 2 Robert Serles and Edmund Shether.
page 242 note 3 John Willoughby, vicar of Chilham, in particular.
page 242 note 4 LP, XVIII. ii. 546 (pp. 295–418). The LP calendar of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge MS. 128, which is cited here, is almost always accurate and includes long sections in extenso. The sad gap in the collection of depositions and allegations which make up MS. 128 is the lack of any material from Dr. John London, who was not interrogated in Canterbury.
page 243 note 1 Ibid., 295, 311.
page 243 note 2 Ibid., 311.
page 243 note 3 Ibid., 306
page 243 note 4 Ibid., 306, 308, 302, 304–5.
page 243 note 5 Ibid., 306, 307, 308.
page 243 note 6 Ibid., 307.
page 243 note 7 Canterbury Cathedral Library MS. J/Q/335/ii. On the flourishing heresy in Canterbury in the early 1530s, see the monk-chronicler of St. Augustine's abbey: British Museum, Harleian MS. 419, fol. 112v.
page 244 note 1 LP. XVIII. ii. 546 (pp. 311, 313).
page 244 note 2 J. E. Cox (ed.) Miscellaneous Writings and Letters of Thomas Cranmer, (P.S.), 335–6, 411; Archaeologia Cantiana (hereafter cited as Arch. Cant.) lxix, 159–70. George Neville, Lord Abergavenny, died in 1535.
page 244 note 3 Valor Ecclesiasticus, ed. Record Commissioners, i. 1–7.
page 244 note 4 Boulay, F. R. H. Du, ‘Archbishop Cranmer and the Canterbury temporalities,’ English Historical Review, LXVII (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 244 note 5 Valor Eccles., i. 7. The archbishop's many appointments and leases are enrolled in Registers T2 and U, in Canterbury Cathedral Library.
page 244 note 6 E.g., LP. II. p. 1513; III. 1081(8), 1928(4), 3534; IV. ii. p. 1331.
page 245 note 1 LP, V. 119(13), 787; Rowse, A. L., Tudor Cornwall: Portrait of a Society, London 1941, 17, 92; appointed Comptroller of Calais, 1539: LP, XIV. i. 906(17).Google Scholar
page 245 note 2 Cranmer, Letters, 361.
page 245 note 3 Ibid., 345, 361, 372; Ryngley was granted lands worth £37 p.a.: Public Record Office (hereafter cited as PRO) E315/232/2/fol. 41v.
page 245 note 4 Cranmer, Letters, 387.
page 245 note 5 Kent Archives Office (hereafter cited as KAO), PRC 32/19/fols. 7v—12v.
page 245 note 6 Cranmer, Letters, 330.
page 245 note 7 Ibid., 361.
page 245 note 8 Garrett, C. H., The Marian Exiles, Cambridge 1938, 195–6Google Scholar. He was regarded as a favourer of the gospel and dependable in 1564: Camden Miscellany, IX (1893), 63.Google Scholar
page 245 note 9 Cranmer, Letters, 458.
page 245 note 10 Ibid., 389 (mis-dated, should be 1538). Isak was of Well Court in Ickham and had a house in Canterbury: Canterbury Cathedral Library MS. J/Q/337/iv. Cranmer seems also to have had ties with the Boys' and the Hales; cf. Cranmer, Letters, 388.
page 246 note 1 Ridley, Cranmer, 178–85, 240–1.
page 246 note 2 Cranmer, Letters, 397.
page 246 note 3 Compare the two lists of April 1540 and April 1541: PRO E315/245/fols. 76–9 (calendared at LP, XV. 1452) and the patent creating the new chapter, 8 April 1541: LP, XVI. 779(5).
page 246 note 4 Nichols, Narratives, 253.
page 246 note 5 LP, XVIII. ii. 546(p. 325).
page 246 note 6 Ibid., 335.
page 247 note 1 Ibid., 307.
page 247 note 2 Ibid., 319.
page 247 note 3 Ibid., 360, 366.
page 247 note 4 Ibid., 341.
page 247 note 5 Ibid., 369.
page 247 note 6 Ibid., 320–1, 323–4. John Blande was parson of Addisham: PRO E334/2/fol. 52 and DNB. Turner was curate of Chartham near Canterbury: Acts of the Privy Council (new ser.) (cited as APC), i. 156.
page 248 note 1 See Berry, William, Pedigrees of the Families in the County of Kent (1830), and the list of gentry temp. Henry VII in Arch. Cant., xi, 394–7.Google Scholar
page 248 note 2 For Moyle, see DNB; W. C. Richardson, History of the Court of Augmentations; Wedgwood, J. C., Biographies of the members of the House of Commons (1936–1938), 616–7; also a biography prepared by the History of Parliament Trust, which I have been kindly allowed to consult; will and inquisition post mortem: PRO Prob. 11/43/55 and C142/129/26.Google Scholar
page 248 note 3 Seymour, Charles, Survey of Kent (1776), 335–44. His grants of Crown lands: LP, XVII. p. 695; XVIII. i. 226(89); XIX. i. 610(61, 116); one particular for sale: PRO E318/16/794. See LP, XIV ff. for his public activities.Google Scholar
page 249 note 1 LP, XII. ii. 1311. See also Arch. Cant., XI. 143; XIV. 165; Loades, David, Two Tudor Conspiracies, Cambridge 1965, 83; Nichols, Narratives, 187–8. He was sheriff in 1556–7.Google Scholar
page 249 note 2 For Baker see DNB; Richardson, Augmentations; Seymour, Survey of Kent, 729–30; LP, V ff.; APC, I, II, III; KAO U24 (Baker deeds); PRO Prob. 11/42a/24 and C142/123/99. Baker was on the 1556 heresy commission, with Moyle and Petit: Cal. of Patent Rolls 1555–57, 24–5. Also Foxe, John, Actes and Monuments, ed. Pratt, J.London, 1870, V. 438–9, vii. 291–7.Google Scholar
page 249 note 3 LP, IV. 6043 (p. 2691); History of Parliament Trust biography; Gardiner, Dorothy, Historic Haven: the Story of Sandwich (1954).Google Scholar
page 249 note 4 Berry, Pedigrees; Harleian Soc, Visitations of Kent; Hasted, Edward, History and topographical survey of the county of Kent, ed. 1778–1799, iii. 109, 245, 262, 677; the land transaction: LP, XIV. ii, 782 (p. 326); XVII. 285 (3). Will and IPM: KAO, PRC 17/26/fols. 136–41; PRO, C142/84/84.Google Scholar
page 250 note 1 PRO, E36/120/fol. 126 (LP, XV. App. 3); Strype, John, Memorials of Cranmer, Oxford 1848–1854, i. 143–4Google Scholar.
page 250 note 2 PRO, SP 1/238/fol. 206v (LP, Add. I. i. 900); Somerville, Robert, History of the Duchy of Lancaster 1265–1603, I, London 1953, 391; Wedgwood, Biographies, 854–5; Cat. Pat. Rolls, 1467–77 and 1477–85 passim; Berry, Pedigrees, 106, 207; LP, VII. 761 (39); VIII. 761 (8); Poynings' will: PRO, Prob. 11/28/21; Hasted, Kent, iii. 136.Google Scholar
page 250 note 3 Lambeth Palace Library, Register Warham, fol. 379v; Bodleian Library, charter no. 191; PRO, E179/124/190; LP, IV. 1533(1).
page 251 note 1 Canterbury Cath. Lib., Reg. T, fol. 290v; on Elizabeth Barton see William Lambard, A Perambulation of Kent, ed. 1826, 169–75; Knowles, David, The Religious Orders in England, Cambridge 1959, iii, 182–91; LP, IV. 5083 (2).Google Scholar
page 251 note 2 On the St. Legers see DNB; on Arthur see Faculty Office Registers, ed. Chambers, D. S. 1966, 86Google Scholar; Neilson, N., The Cartulary and Terrier of Bilsington Priory, 1928; LP, IV. 4557; will, KAO, PRC 22/7/fol. 27; on George, Lambeth Palace Library, Reg. Cranmer, fol. 343.Google Scholar
page 251 note 3 LP, VI. 1460 and PRO, SP 1/79/fol. 75 (LP, VI. 1149 (1); PRO, SP 1/88/fol. 171 (LP, VII. App. 30); LP, VII. 386, 1026 (10); VI. 1381.
page 251 note 4 PRO, SP 1/83/fols. 108–13 (LP, VII. 515); LP, VIII. 864, IX. 1010, XII. ii. 1099, 1122, 1151 (3); IX. 142.
page 252 note 1 31 Henry VIII, cap. 3; lands: PRO, E315/212/fol. 166v; E315/189/fol. 47; E315/215/fols. 30–2; E314/10/100.
page 252 note 2 LP, VII. 515; XVIII. ii, 546(360).
page 252 note 3 LP, XVIII. i, 623(96).
page 252 note 4 PRO, Prob. 11/33/11; C142/91/4; three years later, at his son's death the lands were valued at £108 p.a.: PRO, Wards 9/135/fol. 299.
page 252 note 5 Nichols, Narratives, 252.
page 253 note 1 De Republica Anglorum, ed. Alston, L., Cambridge 1906, 89.Google Scholar
page 253 note 2 The King's Book, or a necessary doctrine and erudition for any Christian Man, ed. Lacey, T. A., London 1932, 103–4.Google Scholar