Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:27:26.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The English Evangelicals and the Pilgrim Tax in India, 1800–1862

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Kenneth Ingham
Kenneth Ingham
Affiliation:
Lecturer in History, University College of East Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The East India Company's accession to political and administrative responsibility in India in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries was greatly complicated by the simultaneous development of the evangelical movement in England with its missionary agents overseas. India was one of the first areas of British expansion to feel the pressure of evangelical influence upon the conduct of its government. South Africa was to take its turn soon afterwards, and in both cases the younger Charles Grant played an important part, through his tenure of the offices of President of the Board of Control and Colonial Secretary.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1952 , pp. 191 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 192 note 1 Buchanan, C., Memoir of the Expediency of an Ecclesiastical Establishment for British India London 1805Google Scholar.

page 193 note 1 Parl. Papers 1812–13, viii, ‘Papers relating to the Temple at Juggernaut,’ 41.

page 193 note 2 Bengal Letters Received i, Revenue Letter dated 21 August 1806 and lvi, Revenue Letter dated 30 December 1809.

page 193 note 3 C.R.O. Home Misc. lix. 465 ff.

page 194 note 1 C.R.O. Bengal Despatches 1, 117.

page 194 note 2 Parl. Papers 1812–13, x. Two letters from John Bebb Esq., dated 22 and 23 April 1813.

page 194 note 3 C.R.O. Court Minutes, cxxi, 129.

page 194 note 4 English Works of Raja Ram Mohun Roy, ed. Ghose, J. C., Calcutta 1885, 107–47Google Scholar.

page 195 note 1 L.M.S. MSS. India, Bengal, Box 2, 1824–9. Letter of G. Mundy to the Rev. G. Burder, Chinsurah 8 May 1824.

page 195 note 2 C.R.O. Bengal Despatches, cxxi, 1138.

page 195 note 3 C.R.O. Bengal Despatches, lxvi, 313–4.

page 195 note 4 Op. cit., 3rd Edition, London 1832, 120, 141–2.

page 196 note 1 Townley, H., An Answer to the Abbé Dubois, London 1823, 212Google Scholar.

page 197 note 1 C.R.O. Bengal Despatches, cxxi, 1136, 1149 ff.

page 197 note 2 Ibid. 1140–1.

page 198 note 1 Ibid. 1181–94.

page 198 note 2 L.M.S. MSS. South India, Tamil, Box 4, 1831–2. Letters of W. Taylor to the Treasurer and Secretary of L.M.S., Madras 17 March 1831 and E. Crisp to W. Hankey, Combaconum 6 October 1831.

page 199 note 1 Missionary Register, London 1831, 31–2.

page 199 note 2 C.R.O. Bengal Despatches, cxxi, 1195–1279.

page 200 note 1 L.M.S. MSS. South India, Tamil, Box 5, 1833. Letter of W. H. Drew to the Rev. W. Ellis, Madras 26 November 1833.

page 200 note 2 Parl. Papers 1839, xxxix. ‘Idolatry (India)’, p. 1 and 1841, xvii. ‘East India’, p. 1.