^{page 115 note 1} Raines, F. R., Notitia Cestriensis, Chetham Society, 1850, II, 372Google Scholar.

^{page 115 note 2} Wallace, John M., ‘The Engagement Controversy 1649–1652, An Annotated List of Pamphlets’ in The Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 68 (1964), 384–405Google Scholar.

^{page 115 note 3} Gee is mentioned in: Laslett, P. (ed.), Patriarcha and other Political Works of Sir Robert Filmer, Oxford 1949, 38Google Scholar; Zagorin, P., A History of Political Thought in the English Revolution, London 1954, 75–77Google Scholar; J. M. Wallace, loc. cit., 386–389, and also in Wallace's Destiny His Choice: The Loyalism of Andrew Marvell, Cambridge 1968, 58–59Google Scholar; Tuck, Richard, ‘Power and Authority in Seventeenth-Century England’ The Historical Journal XVII, (1974), 43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

^{page 116 note 1} The Divine Right and Originall of the Civill Magistrate from God Illustrated and Vindicated (1658), Preface (unpaginated), Section 2.

^{page 116 note 2} Ibid., Preface, Section 6.

^{page 116 note 3} Ibid., 20–21.

^{page 117 note 1} Ibid., 22–23.

^{page 117 note 2} A Vindication of the Oath of Allegiance (1650), 37.

^{page 117 note 3} Samuel Rutherford, Lex Rex (1644), 5 and 14.

^{page 117 note 4} Philip Hunton, A Treatise of Monarchie (1643), 4.

^{page 117 note 5} Henry Ferne, The Resolving of Conscience (1642), 14.

^{page 117 note 6} Bramhall, John, ‘The Serpent-Salve’, in Works of John Bramhall, Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology, Oxford 1844, III, 317–18Google Scholar.

^{page 118 note 1} Divine Right and Originall, 168; Vindication, 35; A Plea for Non-Subscribers (1650), appendix 35–36.

^{page 118 note 2} Baxter, Richard, ‘King James His Abdication of the Crown Plainly Proved’ in Schlatter, Richard, Richard Baxter and Puritan Politics, New York 1957, 159Google Scholar.

^{page 118 note 3} Ibid., 161–162.

^{page 118 note 4} Divine Right and Originall, 43.

^{page 118 note 6} Ibid., 62.

^{page 118 note 7} Ibid., 70–71; An Exercitation concerning usurped powers (1650), 1–2; Plea, appendix, 13; A Treatise of Prayer and of Divine Providence as relating to it (1653), 447–448.

^{page 119 note 1} Divine Right and Originall, 41–43, 57–59, 112–113, Exercitation 62–63.

^{page 119 note 2} Treatise of Prayer, 438 and 452; Divine Right and Originall, 84–85, 88; Exercitation, 62–63.

^{page 119 note 3} Hunton, op. cit., 1.

^{page 119 note 4} Divine Right and Originall, 91.

^{page 120 note 1} (Anon.) A Pack of Old Puritans (1650), 34.

^{page 120 note 2} Halley, Robert, Lancashire, Its Puritanism and Non-conformity, Manchester 1869, ii, 68Google Scholar.

^{page 120 note 3} Ibid., 115–116.

^{page 120 note 4} Exercitation, 81.

^{page 120 note 5} Plea, 33; see also, 21.

^{page 120 note 6} Divine Right and Originall, 271–272.

^{page 121 note 1} Ibid., 180, 184, 124–126.

^{page 121 note 2} Ibid., 296.

^{page 121 note 3} Parkinson, Richard (ed.), The Life of Adam Martindale, Written by Himself, Chetham Society, 1845, 98Google Scholar.

^{page 121 note 4} (Francis Rous?), The Exercitation Answered (1650), 18.

^{page 121 note 5} Knachel, Philip (ed.), Nedham, Marchamont, The Case of the Commonwealth of England Staled, Charlottesville, Va., 1969, 30–31Google Scholar.

^{page 121 note 6} John Dury, Objections against the taking of the Engagement Answered (1650), 4.

^{page 121 note 5} Ibid., 9 and 12.

^{page 121 note 8} Ibid., 7; see also Dury's Just Re-Proposals to Humble Proposals (1650), 10 and 25.

^{page 122 note 1} Nedham (ed. Knachel), 41.

^{page 122 note 2} Plea, 11.

^{page 122 note 3} Exercitation, 20–21.

^{page 122 note 4} Nedham (ed. Knachel), 30; Exercitation Answered, 17; Dury, Objections, 15–16 and 21.

^{page 123 note 1} Nedham (ed. Knachel), 15–29 and 38.

^{page 123 note 2} Ferne, op. cit., Section III, and Bramhall, Works, iii, 318–319, and 341–342.

^{page 123 note 3} Divine Right and Originall, 293.

^{page 124 note 1} Parkinson, Richard (ed.), The Autobiography of Henry Newcome M.A. Chetham Society, 1852, 119Google Scholar.

^{page 124 note 2} Divine Right and Originall, 157 and 148–149.

^{page 124 note 3} Ibid., 150.

^{page 124 note 4} Ibid., 138–143.

^{page 124 note 5} Ibid., 332.

^{page 124 note 6} Ibid., 331–332.

^{page 125 note 1} Ibid., 160.

^{page 125 note 2} Ibid., 160–161.

^{page 125 note 3} Sir Robert Filmer, ‘The Anarchy of a Limited or Mixed Monarchy’ in Laslett (ed.), Patriarcha, 288.

^{page 125 note 4} Divine Right and Originall, 185–186.

^{page 125 note 5} Ibid., 172, and 185–186.

^{page 125 note 6} Ibid., 186.

^{page 126 note 1} Ibid., 186–187.

^{page 126 note 2} Parkinson (ed.), Martindale, 98–100.

^{page 126 note 3} John Dury, A Second Parcel of Objections against the taking of the Engagement Answered (1650), 82.

^{page 126 note 4} Ibid., 87.

^{page 127 note 1} Ibid., 89 and 93.

^{page 127 note 2} Halley, Lancashire, 187.