Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:20:27.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Die Domschule von Konstanz zur Zeit des Investiturstreits: die wissenschaftliche Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und zweier Kleriker dargestellt auf Grund von Handschriftenstudien. By Johanne Autenrieth. (Forschungen zur Kirchen und Geistesgeschichte, Neue Folge, Band III). Pp. 179 + 4 plates. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1956. DM. 13.20.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Walter Ullmann
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 240 note 1 In this context reference should have been made to Urban II's advice: Loewenfeld, S., Epistolae Pontificum Romanorum ineditae, Leipzig 1885, 61 no. 126Google Scholar. It might have been helpful if a comparison had been made with Bonizo's method; cf. Lewald, Ursula, An der Schwelle der Scholastik: Bonizo von Sutri & das Kirchenrecht seiner Tage, Weimar 1938Google Scholar; also Reinke, A., Die Schuldialektik im Investiturstreit, Stuttgart, 1937Google Scholar.

page 241 note 1 This is noteworthy in view of the recent findings by Ryan, J. J., S. Peter Damian and his canonical sources, Toronto 1956Google Scholar, who shows that Pseudo-Isidore was not used by Peter Damian either.