^{page 91 note 1} ‘Acace de Mélitène, Proclus de Constantinople et la Grande Arménie,’ Memorial L. Petit, Archives de l' Orient Chrétien, 1, Bucharest 1948, 393–412.Google Scholar

^{page 91 note 2} ‘La Christologie d'Eutyches d'aprèe les Actes du synode dc Flavien (448),’ Byzantion 6(1931), 441 n. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 92 note 1} ‘The Original Lists of the Members of the Council of Nicea, the Robber-Synod and the Council of Chalcedon,’ Byzantion 16, i (1942/1943) 68 n. 133.Google Scholar

^{page 92 note 2} ‘La christologie du monophysisme syrien,’ Das Konzil von Chalkedon, Würzburg 1952. 555.Google Scholar

^{page 93 note 1} ‘Le Chalcédonisme et le Néo-Chalcédonisme,’ Das Konzil von Chalkedon, 1, 637–720Google Scholar: Moeller refers to the important pages of Richard, M., ‘Le Néo-Chalcédonisme’ in Mélanges de Science Religieuse, Lille, 3 (1946), 156–61, and to his own studies.Google Scholar

^{page 93 note 2} On this and allied questions, cf. Richard, M., ‘Léonce de Byzance était-il Origeniste ?’ Rev. Ex. Byz. 5 (1947), 31–66.Google Scholar

^{page 93 note 3} Cf. Altaner, B., ‘Der griechische Theologe Leontius und Leontius der skythische Moench,’ Tuebinger Theologische Quartalschrift, 127 (1947), 147–65, especially 153.Google Scholar

^{page 93 note 4} [Translation from the German kindly supplied by the Rev. C. Linde and the Rev. B. Leeming, S. J., and approved by Professor Grillmeier.—Ed.]