Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:08:49.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calvin and the Duty of the Guardians to Resist: A Further Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Documents
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In this Journal, xxxii (1981) 6570Google Scholar.

2 See, for instance, Meijers, E. M., Études d'histoire du droit, Leyden 1959, iii. 3Google Scholarff; further literature in Ullmann, W., Principles of Government and Politics in the Middle Ages, 4th edn, London 1978, 312Google Scholar.

3 For this see Ullmann, W., The Carolingian Renaissance and the Idea of Kingship, London 1969, 102Google Scholar, where the ordines are cited.

4 M. G. H., Capitularia 252 at 212, lines 30f; details in Carolingian Renaissance 123f.

5 Extra: II. xxiv. 33.

6 Cf. Ullmann, Carolingian Renaissance, 177ff with details.

7 Baldus clc Ubaldis, Lectura in ires priores Libras decretalium (ed. Lyons 1585), II. xxiv. fo. 234.

8 Panormitanus. Lectura in Decretales (ed. Lyons 1512), II. xxiv. 33, to. 128V.

9 Cited from Kantorowicz, E., The King's Two Bodies, Princeton 1957, 377Google Scholar.

10 Maitland, F. W., History of English Law, 2nd edn, Cambridge 1923, ii. 445Google Scholar.

11 For this cf. Ullmann, Principles, 180ff, 321f.

12 That, incidentally, was one of the reasons why the jurists held the Constitutum Constantini to be invalid and why the English Parliament in 1366 revoked the grant made by Kingjohn to the papacy.

13 L. Wenger, ‘Hausgewalt und Staatsgewalt im romischen Altertum’ in Miscellanea Francesco Ehrle (=Studi e Testi, cxxxviii, 1924), 1–35, here p. 24.

14 See Deusdedit. Collectio canonum, ed. W. von Glanvell. Paderborn 1905, iii. 269, at 378: ‘Novit prudentia tua Anglorum regnum … sub apostolorum principis manu et tutela extitissc”

15 See the passages cited from St Augustine and St Jerome in W. Ullmann, ‘Schranken der Konigsgewalt im Mittelalter’, repr. in his The Church and the Law in the earlier Middle Ages, Collected Studies, i, London 1975, ch. 8, at 13f, notes 35, 36. Sec further Rhabanus Maurus, Enanationes in Epistolas Pauli in P.L. cxn. 310D and 31 iD; Haimo of Halbcrstadt, Exposilia in Epistolas Pauli, in P.L. cxvu. 684f’. Cf. also Halmel, A., Ober romisches Recht im Calaterbrief, Essen 1895Google Scholar.

16 Here special mention should be made of Justinian's Institutes, iv. 10 pr. See also Diocletian in Cod. Just. II. liv. 4: ‘Respublica iurc minorum uti solet.' For the enormous implications and consequences of this view of the kingdom's minority, el. Ullmann, ‘Schranken der Konigsgewalt’, 14ff; idem, Individual and Society in the Middle Ages, London and Baltimore 1966, esp. 123; Law and Politics in the Middle Ages, London and Cambridge 1975, 58, 92, 206f.; Jurisprudence in the Middle Ages, Collected Studies, iv, London 1980, ch. 2, at 205ff.

17 For this cf. Ullmann, W., ‘Der Souveranitatsgedanke in den mittelalterlichen Kronungsordines’ in Festschrift f. P. E. Schramm, ed. Classen, P. und P. Scheibert, Wiesbaden 1964, i. 7289Google Scholar, repr. The Church and the Law, ch. 6; ‘Zur Enrwicklung des Souveranitatsbe-griffs im Spatmittelalter’ in Festschrift f. Nikolaus Crass, ed. Steinegger, H., Innsbruck 1974Google Scholar. i. 9–27, repr. in Scholarship and Politics in the Middle Ages, Collected Studies, iii, London 1978Google Scholar, ch. 9.