Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:19:11.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Byzantium and the Papacy in the Eleventh Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

D. M. Nicol
D. M. Nicol
Affiliation:
University College, Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the beginning of the eleventh century the Byzantine empire was at the height of its glory. The emperor Basil II, who died in 1025 after a reign of nearly fifty years, completed and consolidated the work of the two great soldier emperors before him, and deserves to rank with Justinian and Heraclius as among the greatest of all the rulers of Byzantium. In the East the Arabs had been beaten back and humiliated; on the North the Bulgars were savagely defeated by Basil himself and their territory reduced to a province of the empire; Armenia and parts of the Caucasus were conquered; and the Mediterranean was cleared of pirates and policed by the Byzantine fleet. The internal security of the empire seemed unshakable, its riches inexhaustible, and its prestige extended far beyond its boundaries. It was in 989, in the reign of Basil II, that the largest of the Slav states came within the Byzantine sphere of influence, when Vladimir of Kiev married the emperor's own sister and was converted to Orthodox Christianity and Byzantine culture. At the beginning of the eleventh century the Byzantines were justly proud of themselves, of their empire, its civilisation, stability and prosperity, and equally of their Church. They were more convinced than they had ever been of the truth, cherished since the days of Constantine, that the Roman empire was God's plan for the order of the world, or, as Eusebius had said, the terrestrial image of the Kingdom of Heaven, and that its ruler, the one true emperor in the ‘Queen of Cities’, was divinely ordained as God's regent on earth.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , April 1962 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 2 note 1 Dölger, F., ‘Die “Familie der Könige” im Mittelalter’, Historisches Jahrbuch, lx (1940), 397–420Google Scholar; reprinted in Byzanz und die europäische Staatenwelt, Ettal 1953, 34–69. Ostrogorsky, G., ‘The Byzantine Emperor and the hierarchical world order’, Slavonic and East European Review, xxxv (1956), 1–14Google Scholar.

page 2 note 2 Ensslin, W., Zur Frage nach der ersten Kaiserkrönung durch den Patriarchen und zur Bedeutung dieses Aktes im Wahlzeremoniell, Wurzburg 1947.Google Scholar

page 2 note 3 F. Dölger, ‘Rom in der Gedankenwelt der Byzantiner’, Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte, lxvi (1937), 1–42; reprinted in Byzanz, etc., 70–115.

page 4 note 1 Ullmann, W., The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages, London 1955, 74.Google Scholar

page 4 note 2 F. Dölger, ‘Rom in der Gedankenwelt der Byzantiner’, 110 f.

page 5 note 1 Dölger, F., ‘Byzanz und das Abendland vor den Kreuzzügen’, X Congresso Internazionale di Scienze Storiche, Relazioni, iii., Florence 1955, 84 f.Google ScholarMichel, A, Humbert und Kerullarios, i., Paderborn 1925, 20–40Google Scholar. Every, G., The Byzantine Patriarchate, 451–1204, London 1947, 149Google Scholar.

page 6 note 1 Runciman, S., The Eastern Schism, Oxford 1955, 65Google Scholar.

page 6 note 2 Radulf Glaber, in P.L. cxlii. 671.

page 6 note 3 S. Runciman, op. cit., 36, and Ostrogorsky, G., History of the Byzantine State, Oxford 1956, 296, n. 2Google Scholar, accept it as true; but, for the opposite view, cf. Michel, A., ‘Die Weltreichs und Kirchenteilung bei R. Glaber’, Historisches Jahrbuch, lxx (1951), 52–64Google Scholar, and F. Dölger, ‘Byzanz und das Abendland’, 81.

page 7 note 1 Grumel, V., ‘L'annexion de l'Illyricum oriental, de la Sicile et de la Calabre au patriarcat de Constantinople’, Recherches des sciences religieuses, xxxix–xl (1951–2), 191 f.Google Scholar, suggested that the annexation of Sicily, Calabria and Illyricum to the patriarchate of Constantinople dated from the pontificate of Stephen II, and after 754. But the traditional date of this event, 732–3, has since been defended by M. V. Anastos, ‘The transfer of Illyricum, Calabria and Sicily to the jurisdiction of the patriarchate of Constantinople in 732–33’, Silloge Bizantina in onore di S. G. Mercati (Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici, 9) (1957), 14–31.

page 7 note 2 Mayne, R., ‘East and West in 1054’, Cambridge Historical Journal, xi. 2 (1954), 146Google Scholar.

page 7 note 3 Charanis, P., ‘The Byzantine Empire in the Eleventh Century’ in A History of the Crusades, i. Philadelphia 1955, 193–4.Google Scholar

page 8 note 1 G. Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State, 297.

page 9 note 1 S. Runciman, op. cit., 43.

page 9 note 2 But cf. W. Ullmann, op. cit., 267, n. 2.

page 9 note 3 R. Mayne, op. cit., 146–8.

page 10 note 1 G. Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State, 297.

page 10 note 2 Gibbon, E., The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, ed. Bury, J. B., London 1898, vi. 370Google Scholar.

page 11 note 1 ‘To him (Humbert) the implementation of the primacy of the Roman Church was the cardinal point: the Roman Church is the hinge and head—‘cardo et caput’—of all the other Churches'. This principle ‘comprises also the Eastern half of Christendom’. ‘The Western and Eastern Emperors are the arms of the Pope.’ W. Ullmann, op. cit., 266, 267, 268.

page 11 note 2 R. Mayne, op. cit., 142.

page 11 note 3 Michel, A., ‘Die Rechtsgultigkeit des römischen Bannes gegen Michael Keroullarios’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift, xlii (1942), 193–205Google Scholar. P. Charanis, in Crusades, i. 210 n. 36. Cf. S. Runciman, op. cit., 46. (But the question was ourely academic for Cerularius).

page 12 note 1 G. Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State, 300 and references.

page 12 note 2 S. Runciman, op. cit., 56–7.

page 13 note 1 F. Dölger, ‘Byzanz und das Abendland’, 86.

page 14 note 1 F. Duncalf, ‘The Councils of Piacenza and Clermont’, in Crusades, i. 223.

page 14 note 2 Runciman, S., A History of the Crusades, i, Cambridge 1951, 99Google Scholar.

page 14 note 3 Hofmann, G., ‘Papst Gregor VII und der Christliche Osten’, Studi Gregoriani, (1947), 169–81Google Scholar. Charanis, P., ‘Byzantium, the West, and the Origins of the First Crusade’, Byzantion, xix (1949), 17–24Google Scholar. P. Charanis, in Crusades, i. 187–8, 213. W. Ullmann, op. cit., 306–7.

page 15 note 1 S. Runciman, History of the Crusades, i. 99–100.

page 16 note 1 Holtzmann, W., ‘Die Unionsverhandlungen zwischen Alexios I und Papst Urban II’, Byzantinische Zeitchrift, xxviii (1928), 38–671Google Scholar. G. Every, op. cit., 177. P. Charanis, in Crusades, i. 216 f. and references at p. 216, n. 46.

page 16 note 2 P. Charanis, op. cit., 217.

page 17 note 1 G. Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State, 318–19.

page 17 note 2 S. Runciman, History of the Crusades, i. 79.

page 18 note 1 On the authenticity of the emperor's letter to Robert, and on the whole incident, see F. Duncalf, in Crusades, i. 228.

page 19 note 1 S. Painter, ‘Western Europe on the Eve of the Crusades’, in Crusades, i. 21.

page 19 note 2 E. Gibbon, Decline and Fall, ed. J. B. Bury, vi. 287.

page 19 note 3 Anna Comnena, Alexiad, x. 8; ii. 218–20 (ed. B. Leib). Anna's views on the papacy and the crusaders are summarised by S. Runciman, Eastern Schism, 110–13, and by Lemerle, P., ‘Byzance et la Croisade’, X Congresso Internazionale di Scienze Storiche, Relazioni, iii (Florence 1955), 595–620Google Scholar (especially 597–8), who also gives an admirable account of the Byzantine attitude to the western idea of the crusade in general.