No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2011
Of all the churches affected by the Gregorian reform movement few were more notable than the monastery of Montecassino. Not only the latter's own writers but even Pope Gregory vii himself described it as famous throughout Christendom. In southern Italy it was undoubtedly the most important single institution of the Latin Church. Founded by St Benedict in 529, by the eleventh century it was exempt from normal ecclesiastical jurisdiction and was the centre of a franchise free from the obligations of lay society. Under the abbacy of Desiderius of Benevento (1058–87) it enjoyed its golden age of political, intellectual and artistic influence. Its monks filled many south Italian bishoprics, and a number of them were promoted to be cardinals. Three times in sixty years, in 1057, 1087 and 1118, a Cassinese monk attained the see of St Peter. Desiderius himself was elected to succeed Gregory vii in 1087, with the title of Victor iii.
1 Chron[ica monasterii] Cas[inensis], ed. Wattenbach, W., M.G.H. SS., Hanover 1846, vii, lib. iii, c. 30Google Scholar: The Epistolae Vagantes of Gregory VII, ed. Cowdrey, H. E. J., Oxford 1972, 74 no. a8Google Scholar.
2 For the development of immunity and concession of judicial powers to the abbey, Fabiani, L., La Terra di S. Benedetto (Miscellenea Cassinese xxxiii-iv, 1968), ii. 11–45.Google Scholar
3 The Ecclesiastical History of Orderic Vitalis, ed. Chibnall, M., Oxford 1969-1978, iv. 166.Google ScholarFor the other accounts, Fliche, A., La réforme grégorienne, Louvain 1924-1938, iii. 213 n. 1Google Scholar.
4 Fliche, A., ‘Le pontificat de Victor III’, Revue d'Histoire Ecclésiastique, xx (1924), 387–412Google Scholar; Leccisotti, T., ‘L'incontro di Desiderio di Montecassino col re Enrico ad Albano’, Studi Gregoriani, i (1947), 307–19Google Scholar.
5 Since he had not himself been consecrated he could not perform the spiritual duty of consecration, although a pontiff-elect could carry out the administrative duty of confirmation. See Benson, R. L., The Bishop-elect, Princeton 1968, 41–5.Google Scholar
6 The letter is included in Hugh of , Flavigny, Chronicon, M.G.H. SS. viii. 466–8.Google Scholar
7 For Gregory's designation, Fliche, A., ‘L'election d'Urbain II’, Moyen Age, xxviii (1915), 356–65.Google ScholarAmong those who dismiss the letter is Bloch, H., ‘Montecassino, Byzantium and the West in the Early Middle Ages’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, iii (1946), 215Google Scholar.
8 , Gregory VII, Registrum, ed. Caspar, E., M.G.H. Epistolae selectae, ii, Berlin 1920-1923, lib. v ep. 17.Google ScholarFliche (above note 3), ii. 223-5. Cowdrey, H. E. J., The Cluniacs and the Gregorian Reform, Oxford 1972, 167Google Scholar.
9 , Hugh, Epistolae, P.L. clvii. 514–16Google Scholar, no. 9.
10 Chron. Cas. iii. 69.
11 , Donizo, Vita Mathildis ii. 312Google Scholar, M.G.H. SS. xii. 386.
12 Die Kanonessammlung des Kardinals Deusdedit, ed. Glanvell, V. Wolf von, Paderborn 1905, 1.Google ScholarLiber Pontificalis, ed. Duchesne, L., Paris 1887-1892, ii. 292Google Scholar.
13 Becker, A., Papst Urban II, Stuttgart 1964, 79 n. 236.Google Scholar
14 Reg. VI. 22, Epistolae Vagartes 12 no. 5, 50 no. 19.
15 Die Briefe Heinrichs IV, ed. Erdmann, C., Berlin 1937, 68, Anhang A.Google Scholar
16 Murray, A., ‘Pope Gregory VII and his Letters’, Traditio, xxii (1966), 149–201, especially 178-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Bloch (above not e 7), 177-87.
18 M.G.H. Diplomatum iii (1900-1903) 603–4 no. 474.Google ScholarFabiani (above not e 2), i. 163.
19 Chron. Cos. ii. 63, 65. M.G.H. Diplomatum iv (1909) 372–6 no. 270.Google Scholar
20 Bloch, H., ‘Monte Cassino's teachers and library in the High Middle Ages’, Settimane di Studio del Centro Italiano di Studi sull'Alto Medioevo, xix (1972), 581–2.Google ScholarLowe, E. A., ‘The Unique Manuscript of Tacitus' Histories’, Casinensia (Montecassino 1929) 257–72.Google ScholarCavallo, G., ‘La transmissione dei testi nell'area Beneventano-Cassinese’, Settimane di Studio…, xxii (1975), 387–91Google Scholar.
21 Chron. Cos. ii. 78.Google ScholarM.G.H. Diplomatum v (1926-1931) 227–30 no. 184Google Scholar.
22 Chron. Cos. iii. 18. Willard, H. M., Abbot Desiderius and the ties between Montecassino and Amalfi in the Eleventh Century (Miscellenea Cassinese 37, 1973) 41–3.Google ScholarChron. Cos. iii. 50.
23 Cilento, N., Le origini della signoria capuana nella Longobardia Minore, Rome 1966, 78.Google Scholar
24 Montecassino, Cod. 3, and Rome, Bibl. Casanatense 641 (B IV 18). See Lowe, E. A., The Beneventan Script, Oxford 1914, 72, 341, and 357.Google Scholar
25 Caspar, E., ‘Echte und Gefalschte Karolingersurkunden für Monte Cassino’, Neues Archiv für altere deutsche Geschichtskunde, xxxiii (1907), 53–73.Google Scholar
26 , Peter the Deacon, Ortus et Vila iustorum Casinensis cenobii, ed. Rodgers, R. H., Berkeley 1972, 30-1 no. xxiiiGoogle Scholar, see the commentary, ibid., 134-5, and Caspar, E., Petrus Diaconus und die Montecassino Fälschungen, Berlin 1909, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Cf. Chron. Cos. i. 7, iv. 108-9.
27 M.G.H. Epistolae Karolini Aevi ii (Berlin 1895) 510–14Google Scholar, see the list of MSS on pp. 509–10 to which should be added British Library Add. MS 22633. fols. 84-9 and Oriel College, Oxford MS 42 fols. 218-9.
28 M.G.H. Diplomatum Karolinorum i (1906) 214–16 no. 158Google Scholar, Fabiani (above note 2), ii. 15. For the claims about , Justinian, M.G.H. Diplomatum ix (1927) 201 no. 120Google Scholar, and for Placidus, Caspar, Petrus Diaconus, 46–72Google Scholar, summarised in brief by White, L. T., Latin Monasticism in Norman Sicily, Cambridge, Mass. 1938, 8–10Google Scholar.
29 Chron. Cos. ii. 91.Hoffmann, H., ‘Der Kalendar des Leo Marsicanus’, Deutsches Archiv, xxi 1965), 97Google Scholar.
30 For the discovery, Chron. Cos. iii. 26,Meyvaert, P., ‘Peter the Deacon and the tombof St Benedict. A re-examination of the Cassinese tradition’, Revue Benedictine, lxv (1955), 3–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For references to the body, Chron. Cos. ii. 43-4, iv. 5. Le colonie cassinesi in Capitanata IV: Troia, ed. T. Leccisotti (Miscellenea Cassinese 29, 1957) 64-5 no. 12 (1080),Gattula, E., Accessiones ad Historian Abbatiae Casinensis, Venice 1734, 206–7 (1091)Google Scholar, Archivio di Montecassino, Registrum Petri Diaconi fol. 231v-232v no. 550 (1094).
31 As in Chron. Cos. iv. 5 and a forged bull of'Urban 11’ of 1091, for which Kehr, P. F., Italia Pontificia VIII: Regnum Normannorum-Campania, Berlin 1935, 152 no. 136Google Scholar, , Caspar, Petrus Diaconus, 109Google Scholar.
32 Kitzinger, E., ‘The Gregorian Reform and the Visual Arts’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th sen, xxii (1972), 97–101Google Scholar. Gregory the Great, Dialogi Lxbri IV, ed. U. Moricca (Fonti per la Storia d'ltalia, Rome 1924) lib. ii, 71-134. The famous lectionary connected with the dedication of the new church of Cassino built by Desiderius on 1 October 1071, now Cod. Vat. Lat. 1202, contained an illuminated text of Book ii of the Dialogues, reproduced by Avery, M. & Inguanez, M., Miniature cassinesi del secolo XI illustranti la vita di S. Benedetto, Montecassino 1934Google Scholar.
33 Thus the Exultet Roll now Cod. Vat. Lat. 3784 retained the text known as the Vetus Itala rather than the Vulgate,Avery, M., The Exultet Rolls of South Italy, Princeton 1936, 30.Google ScholarThis was produced under Desiderius. See also Avery, M., ‘The Beneventan lections for the Vigil of Easter and the Ambrosian Chant banned by Pope Stephen IX at Montecassino’, Studi Gregoriani, i (1947), 433–58Google Scholar.
34 , Peter the , Deacon, Ortus et Vita, 34–5Google Scholarc. xxvi, 54-5 c. xxx, and De viris illustribus casinensibus, P.L. clxxiii. 1044 c. 40. Chron. Cos. iii. 67.
35 For example in the admission of Hugh of Burgundy as a monk at Cluny in 1078, Cowdrey (above note 8), 144-5.
36 Chron. Cos. ii. 97, iv. 83.
37 Storia de’ Normanni di Amato di Montecassino volgarizzata in anticofrancese, ed. Bartholomaeis, V. de (Fonti per la Storia d'ltalia, Rome 1935), lib. viii c. 36.Google Scholar
38 Scandone, F., ‘Roccasecca. Patria de S. Tommaso di Aquino’, Archivio Storico di Terra di Lavoro, i (1956), 42–3.Google Scholar
59 Chron. Cos. ii. 69-70, 73.Wühr, W., ‘Die Wiedergeburt Montecassinos unter seinen ersten Reformabt Richer von Niederaltaich’, Studi Gregoriani, iii (1948), 412–13Google Scholar.
40 Chron. Cos. iii. 41.
41 Amatus ii. 35-40, iv. 34-48, vii. 35, viii. 2-3, 21.
42 Amatus vii. 35. Chron. Cos. iii. 15.
45 Gattula (above note 30), 164-5 (1065), 165-6 (1065), 166 (1066), and his Historia abbatiae Casinensis, Venice 1733, 312Google Scholar(1066). Chron. Cos iii. 16.Chalandon, F., Histoire de la domination normande en Italie et en Sidle, Paris 1907. i. 219–20.Google ScholarPalmarocchi, R., L'Abbaua di Montecassino e la conquista normanna, Rome 1913, 83–4.Google ScholarFabiani (above note 2), ii. 327-33.
44 Amatius ii. 35-7, Chron. Cos. ii. 56-9, 61-2 for Basil an d Todinus. Desiderius,Dialogi de miraculis Sancti Benedicti, ed. Schwarz, G. and Hofmeister, A., M.G.H. SS xxx (2)Google Scholar, especially lib. ic. 9, p. 1123, and i. 13, p. 1125–6.
45 Falkenhausen, V. von, ‘Aspetti storico-economici dell'eta di Roberto il Guiscardo’, Roberto il Guiscardo e il suo Tempo. Relazioni e Comunicazioni nelle Prime Giornate normannosveve, Barimaggio 1973, Rome 1975, 115.Google Scholar
46 , Gregory, Reg. vi. 37Google Scholar, Epistolae Vagantes, 72–3 no. 28. Chron. Cos. iii. 46.Tirelli, V., ‘Osservazioni sui rapporti tra Sede Apostolica, Capua, e Napoli durante i poncificati di Gregorio VII e di Urbano II’, Studi nel Medioevo Cristiano offerti a Rqffaello Morghen, Rome 1974, ii. 1000–1Google Scholarshows that these were two separate incidents, rather than the same as was once thought.
47 Amatus viii. 22.
41 Amatus viii. 35-6. Gregory, Reg. vi. 1 was written at Capua on 1 July 1078.
49 Martene, E. & Durand, U., Thesaurus norms anecdotorum, Paris 1717, iv. 108.Google Scholar
50 Regesto di S. Angelo in Formis, ed. Inguanez, M., Montecassino 1925, 6–8 no. 3. Chron. Cos. iii. 42.Google Scholar
51 Desiderius, Dialogi iii. 5, p. 1148, iii. introduction, pp. 1142-3, ii. 25, p. 1140. See Poole, R. L., ‘Benedict ix and Gregory vi’, Proceedings of the British Academy (1917-1918), 209–13.Google ScholarFor the abbey of St Paul, Paul of Bernried, Vita Gregorii VII, P.L. cxlviii. 43, Gerhoh of Reichersberg, Commentarius in Psalmum LXIV, M.G.H. Libelli de lite, Hannover 1891-7, iii. 461,Trifone, B., ‘Le carte del monasterio di San Paulo di Roma dei secolo xi a xv’, Archivio delta Reale Societd Storia Patria Romana, xxi (1908), 278–85 (1081).Google ScholarCowdrey (above note 8), 173.
52 Poerna di Amalo su S. Pietro Apostolo, ed. Lentini, A. (Miscellenea Cassinese 30, 1958).Google Scholar
55 Meyvaert, P., ‘Berengar de Tours contre Alberic du Mont-Cassin’, Revue Benedictine, Ixx (1960), 324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Martene & Durand, op cit. iv. 108-110. One should note that the former monk of Cassino, Archbishop Alfanus I of Salerno, apparently sympathised with Berengar:Southern, R. W., ‘Lanfranc of Bee and Berengar of Tours’, Studies in Medieval History presented to Frederick Maurice Powicke, Oxford 1948, 48Google Scholar.
35 , Guimund, De Corporis et Sanguinis veritate in Eucharistia, P.L. cxlix 1427–94.Google ScholarFor an analysis,Macdonald, A. J., Berengar and the Reform of Sacramental Doctrine, London 1930, 341–56Google Scholar.
56 Die Briefe Heinrichs IV (above not e 15), 72, Anhang C.
57 Gregory, Epistolae Vagantes 72-6 nos. 28-q. G. B. Borino, ‘Note Gregoriane’, Studi Gregoriani, iv (1952), 465-6. Chron. Cos. iii. 13, 45.
58 Ursus entered his see on 3 August 1080,Anonym Barensis Chronicon in Muratori, L. A., Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, Milan 1723-1751, v. 153Google Scholar, although he had been archbishop-elect since the previous year,Babudri, F., ‘Le note autobiografiche di Giovanni, arcidiacono barese e la cronologia dell'arcivescovato di Ursone a Bari 1078-1089’, Archivio Storico Pugliese, ii (1949), 136.Google ScholarHis translation needed papal approval, which can only have been forthcoming at die Ceprano meeting of 29 Jun e 1080. Ivo of Chartres, Epistolae, P.L. clxii. 99–100 no. 78, said that Robert ha d been promoted by apostolic authority. This was between April an d September 1080,Codice diplomatico normanno di Aversa, ed. Gallo, A., Naples 1927, pp. 3–5Google Scholarnos. 1-2, an d again the Ceprano meeting was the likely place for this.
59 , Gregory, Reg. viii. 28.Google ScholarHoffmann, H., ‘Die alteren Abtslisten von Monte Cassino’, Quellen und Forschungen aus Italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken, xlvii (1967), 352–4,Google ScholarAnhang III. There are few other references to heretics in this area, although a charter of Archbishop Atenulf of Capua of 1032 spoke of Manicheans,Ughelli, F., Italia Sacra, ed. Coletti, N., Venice 1717-1722, vi. 535–7Google Scholar.
60 , Gregory, Reg. viii. 15.Google Scholar
61 , Gregory, Reg. ix. 4, 11.Google Scholar
62 Codice diplomatico del monastero benedettino di S. Maria di Tremiti (1005-1237), ed. Petrucci, A. (Fonti per la Scoria d'ltalia, Rome 1960), iii. 250–3 no. 84.Google Scholar
63 Chron. Cos. iii. 50.
64 e.g.Hirsch, F., ‘Desiderius von Monte Cassino als Papst Victor III’, Forschungen zur deutschen Geschichte, vii (1867), 81–2.Google ScholarLeccisotti (above note 4).
65 , Gregory, Reg. viii. 21.Google ScholarOn the importance of this letter,Leyser, K., ‘The Polemics of the Papal Revolution’, Trends in Medieval Political Thought, ed. Smalley, B., Oxford 1965, 53Google Scholar.
66 Fliche (above note 3), ii. 121, M.G.H. Libelli de Lite ii. 112-42. Bernold, Ch.rom.cm. ad an. 1083, M.G.H. SS. v. 437-8.Diversorum Patrwn Sententie sive Collectio in LXXIV Titulis Digesta, ed. Gilchrist, J., Vatican City 1973, 180–96Google Scholar, especially Tit. 88, pp. 195-6.Autenrieth, J., ‘Bernold von Konstanz und die erweiterte 74-Titelsammlung’, Deutsche! Archiv, xiv (1958), 375–94.Google Scholar, Gregory, Reg. ix. 26Google Scholar.
67 , Guido, De schismate Hildebrandini, M.G.H. Libelli de Lite i. 551–2.Google ScholarKrause, H. G., Die Papstwahldekret von 1059 und seine Rolle im Investiturstreit, Studi Gregoriani vii, Rome 1960, esp. 224–6Google Scholar.
68 , Hirsch, art. cit. 81.Google ScholarKnonau, G. Meyer von, Jahrbucher des deutschen Reiches unter Heinrich IV und Heinrich V, Leipzig 1890-1909, iii. 443–6 n. 14.Google ScholarM.G.H. Diplomatum VI, Weimar 1952-3. 454-6 no. 344.
69 Erdmann, C., ‘Untersuchungen zu den Briefen Heinrichs IV’, Archiv fur Urkundenforschung, xvi (1939), 221–2.Google Scholar
70 Die Briefe Heinrichs IV (above note 15), 24-6 no. 17. For the date,Knonau, Meyer von, op. cit., iii. 477Google Scholar.
71 Vita Bennonis,ed. Bresslau, H., M.G.H. in usm scholorum (1902), 30.Google ScholarKnonau, Meyer von, op. cit., iii. 526Google Scholar.
72 Sigebert, Chronicon ad an. 1083, M.G.H. SS. vi. 364. Ekkehard. Chronicon Universale ad an. 1083, M.G.H. SS. vi. 205. Bernold, Chronicon ad an. 1083, M.G.H. SS. v. 438.
75 Raynald of Vezelay, Vita S. Hugonis, P.L. clix. 903-4, Cowdrey (above note 8), 161-2.Diener, H., ‘Das Itinerar des Abtes Hugo von Cluny’, Neue Forschungen uber Cluny und die Climiacenser, ed. Tellenbach, G., Freiburg 1959, 368, 387Google Scholar.
74 ‘Ex Epistola Anselmi ad Wibertum’, M.G.H. SS. xii. 3-5, especially 3. Bonizo of Sutri, Liber ad Amicum, M.G.H. Libelli de Lite i. 613-14.Morrison, K. F., ‘Canossa, a Revision’, Traditio, xviii (1962), 137–41Google Scholarargues that Gregory wanted a settlement. But he produces no evidence that the pope initiated negotiations or saw any settlement possible other than a complete surrender by Henry. He mistranslates Bernold on p. 140 to further his case. His letter, Reg. ix. 29 of the summer of 1083 contains no hint of any accommodation.
75 Fliche (above note 7), 364-5.
76 , Bernold, Chronicon ad an. 1084,Google ScholarM.G.H. SS. v. 441-3. Liber de Unitate Ecclesiae, M.G.H. Libelli de Lite ii. 239-41. Becker (above note 13), 64-74.M.G.H. Briefe der Deutschen Kaiserzeit v: Briefsammlungen der Zeit Heinrichs IV, ed. Erdmann, C. & Fickermann, N., Weimar 1950, 375–80 no. 5Google Scholar.
77 Chalandon (above note 43), 274.
78 Von Falkenhausen (above note 45), 132
79 Chron. Cos. iii. 58. Accessiones (above note 30), 183-4 (1080), Le Colonie Cassinesi (above note 30), 64-5 no. 12 (1080), Archivio di Montecassino, Registrum Petri Diaconi fol. 251v no. 601 (1082), a summary of which is given by Willard (above note 22), 62, and Gattula, Accessiones pp. 192-3(1086).
80 The first of these was Gattula, Accessiones, 161. Others included ibid., 163-4 (1063). the confiscations of 1065-6 (see above note 43), Regesto di S. Angela in Formis, 43-5 no. 15 (1072), 45-6 no. 16 (1072), Gattula, Accessiones, 186 (1077) and 189-90 (1077), Codex diplomaticus Caiettmus, Montecassino 1888-92, ii. 120-2 no. 51 (1078), Gattula, Accessiones, 184-6 (1080), 187-8 (1081).
81 Amatus (above note 37), 16-17, 23-4.Pouille, Guillaume de, La Geste de Robert Guiscard, ed. Mathieu, M., Palermo 1961, lib. v. lines 118-20, p. 242.Google ScholarSome doubts have been expressed about the truth of William's claim.Deer, J., Papsttum und Normannen, Cologne 1972, 140.Google Scholar, Chalandon, op. cit., i. 274.Google ScholarBut Salerno, Romuald of, Chronicon sive Annales, ed. Garufi, C. A., Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, 2nd ed., Citta di Castello 1935, ad an. 1082, p. 195Google Scholar, says that Capua was captured by Robert.
82 Archivio di Montecassino, Aula ii, Caps, xxxvi no. 54. Regesto di S. Angelo in Formis, 55-6 no. 19. Gregory, Reg. ix. 26-7.
83 Benno, Contra Gregorium VII et Urbanum II, M.G.H. Libelli de Lite ii. 380, 407-8.
84 M.G.H. Libelli de Lite ii. 310. Krause (above note 67), 225-6.
85 Flavigny, Hugh of, Chronicon, M.G.H. 55. viii. 460–1.Google ScholarTirelli (above note 46), 1002.Klewitz, H. W., ‘Montecassino und Rom’, Quellen und Forschungen aus Italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken, xxviii (1937-1938), 40–1Google Scholar.
86 Archivio di Montecassino, Registrum Petri Diaconi fol. 251v no. 601.
87 Chron. Cos. iii. 51-3. Gregory, Reg. ix. 35a. Ughelli, Italia Sacra, x. 491-3.
88 Bloch (above note 7), 212-18.
89 Chron. Cos. iii. 66-7.Kuttner, S., ‘Cardinalis, the history of a canonical concept’, Traditio iii (1945), 173-4, 197–8Google Scholar.
90 Amatus viii. 15. Gregory, Reg. viii. 23.
91 Chron. Cos. iii. 67. In spite of a dispute in 1093,Pflugk-Harttung, J. von, Acta ponlificum Romanorum inedita, Leipzig 1880-1886, ii. 149Google Scholarno. 184, Alfanus and Roger had a continuous and close relationship. They were together at the consecration of La Cava in 1092,Guillaume, P., Essai hislorique sur l'abbaye de Cava, Gava dei Tirreni 1877, 59Google Scholar; and Roger made the following donations to the archbishop:Balducci, A., L'archivio della curia arcivescovile di Salerno, i: Regestro delle peragmene (945-1727), Salerno 1945, Area Prima 26 (1089), 33 (1101), 35(1103), 38(1110)Google Scholar.
92 , Ughelli, Italia Sacra i. 1182–3.Google ScholarHirsch (above note 64), 102.
93 Jamison, E. M., review of Palmarocchi, L'abbazia di Montecassino, E[nglish] H[istorical] R[eview], xxx (1915), 109Google Scholar, based on Orderic Vitalis, iv. 168.
94 Chron. Cos. iii. 65, 67-8. Becker (above note 13), 83-4.
95 Ekkehard of Aura, M.G.H. SS. vi. 206, ad an. 1085. Annales Augustani ad an. 1087, M.G.H.SS.Vu. 132.
96 Fedele, P., ‘Carte del monastero dei SS. Cosmae Damiano in Mica Aurea’, Archivio della Reale Societa Storia Patria Romana, xxii (1899), 436–7 no. 93.Google ScholarChronicon Farferue di Gregorio di Catino, ed. Balzani, U. (Fonti per la Storia d'ltalia, Rome 1903), ii. 194.Google ScholarII Regestro di Farfa, ed. Giorgi, I. and Balzani, U., Rome 1879-1914, v. 106 no. 1106, 107-8 no. 1107.Google ScholarLe charte di S. Erasmo di Veroli, ed. Mottironi, S., Rome 1957, 131–52 nos. 73–88 (except no. 82, which is wrongly dated)Google Scholar.
97 Lupus Protospatharius, Annales ad an. 1087, M.G.H. 55. v. 62.
98 Cowdrey, H. E. J., ‘The Mahdia Expedition of 1087’, EHR, xcii (1977), 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99 Chron. Cos. iii. 72, drawing on Deusdedit (above note 84). M.G.H. Libelli de Lite ii. 327 8.Hoffmann, H., ‘Zum Register und zu den Briefen Papst Gregors VII’, Deutsches Archiv, xxxii (1976), 102Google Scholar.
100 Chron. Cos. iii. 73. Hoffmann (above not e 29), 118. Il Necrologio di Cod. Cos. 47, ed. M. Inguanez (Fonti per la Storiad'Italia, Rome 1941).
101 e.g. Bernold, Libellus ix. Pro Gebhardo episcopo Constantiensi Epistola Apologetica, M.G.H. Libelli de Lite ii. 111.
102 Ekkehard of Aura, M.G.H. 55. vi. 206. For the date Wattenbach, W., Holtzrnann, R., Schmale, F.J., Deutschlands, Geschichtsquellen vmMittelalter, Cologne 1967, ii. 492Google Scholar.
105 Chron. Cos. iii. 71. Cowdrey, EHR, xcii, 17.
104 Smidt, W., ‘Guido von Monte Cassino und die Forsetzung der Chronike Leos durch Petrus Diaconus’, Festschrift Albert Brackmam, Weimar 1931, 293–323.Google ScholarHoffmann, H., ‘Studien zur Chronik von Montecassino’, Deutsches Archiv, xxix (1973), 137–50Google Scholar.
105 Chron. Cos. iii. 70.
106 Deacon, Peter the, De viris illustribus Casinensibus, P.L. clxxiii. 1044–5, c. 41.Google Scholar, Hoffmann, Deutsches Archiv, xxix (1973), 110–11Google Scholar.
107 Chron. Cos. iv. 42.Brunonis, Vita, Ada Sanctorum, ed. Bollandiana, July, iv, 483Google Scholar. On the dispute,Gregoire, R., Bruno de Segni, exégete médiéval et théologien monastique, Spoleto 1965, 52–6Google Scholar.
108 Chron. Cos. iv. 108-16.
109 , Bernard, Epistola 124Google Scholar, P.L. clxxxii. 268-g, cf. nos. 125–7 cols. 269-82. Vita Prima Sancti Bemardi, P.L. dxxxv. 294-5., Suger, Vita Ludovici Sexti, ed. Waquet, H., Paris 1929, 258.Google Scholar, Arnulf, Girardum Engolismensem Invectiva de schismate Petri Leonis, M.G.H. Libelli de Lite iii. 106–7Google Scholar.
110 Palumbo, P. F., Lo Schisma del MCXXX, Rome 1942, 170–301.Google Scholar
111 P.L. clvii. 514-16 no. 9.
112 RegestrodiFarfav. 236 no. 1257. ChroniconFarfense ii. 199-200.
113 Chron. Cos. lib. iii. introduction, M.G.H. SS. vii. 698.