Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:40:39.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Mediation of Global Financial Forces: Different Paths of Structural Reforms in Japan and South Korea1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Yves Tiberghien
Yves Tiberghien*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article compares the process of corporate structural reforms in Japan and South Korea in the late 1990s and raises two questions. Why have state-led economies such as Japan and South Korea engaged in politically costly corporate structural reforms in the late 1990s? What explains the variation in the reform process between Japan and South Korea?

I argue that the process of structural reforms in state-led economies has been the result of state mediation of global financial forces. The rise of portfolio capital inflows increases the pressure for domestic reforms, a change that is common to Japan and Korea in the late 1990s. However, the actual success of structural reforms depends on the ability of the elite bureaucracy to mediate among between global investors, domestic interest groups and the general public. In contrast to Korea, Japan exhibits a low level of bureaucratic control over the legislative agenda and a situation of tripolar deadlock.

The evidence presented here includes quantitative data, government documents, and legislative records as well as information gathered from over 100 interviews with bureaucrats, politicians, business leaders, labor leaders, and other actors in the two countries.

Keywords

structural reformscorporate restructuringJapanSouth Koreaglobalizationcapital flowsbureaucratic controllegislative agenda
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , August 2002 , pp. 103 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amyx, Jennifer. 1998. Banking Policy Breakdown and the Declining Institutional Effectiveness of Japan's Ministry of Finance. . Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bank of Japan, International Department. 1999. Comparative Economic and Financial Statistics: Japan and Other Major Countries. Tokyo: Bank of Japan.Google Scholar
Bayoumi, Tamin and Collyns, Charles (eds.) 2000. Post-Bubble Blues: How Japan Responded to Asset Price Collapse. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Blustein, Paul. 2001. The Chastening: Inside the Crisis that Rocked the Global Financial System and Humbled the IMF. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Calder, Kent. 1987. Crisis and Compensation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calder, Kent. 1993. Strategic Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, Scott. 1995. Divided Sun: MITI and the Breakdown of Japanese High-Tech Industrial Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1939. The Twenty Year's Crisis, 1919–1939. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chow, Peter C.Y. and Gill, Bates (eds.) 2000. Weathering the Storm: Taiwan, its Neighbors, and the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, Mark L. 1998. Troubled Tiger: Businessmen, Bureaucrats, and Generals in South Korea. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin. 1998. The Geography of Money. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald. 2000. Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald. and Berger, Suzanne (eds.) 1996. National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
French Senate. Japon: Crise et Douloureuses Mutations. Document de Travail du Senat, No GA 28. Janvier 2000. (Report written based on a French parliamentary mission in Japan in April 1999).Google Scholar
Garelli, Stephane. Executive Summary of the World Competitiveness Yearbook 2001 (WCY 2001), IMD.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Cycle?. International Organization 52(4): 787: 824.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Global Proxy Watch. Various Issues 2000–2001. Davis Global Advisers Inc. Google Scholar
Goldstein, Morris. 1998. The Asian Financial Crisis: Causes, Cures, and Systemic Implications. Washingon, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics. International Organization 32(4): 881–911.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics In Hard Times. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen. 2000. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen. and McCubbins, Mathew D. 2000. Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Soskice, David (eds.) 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
IMF. Staff Country Reports. France, Japan, and Korea. Various Issues (1998 to October 2001).Google Scholar
IMF. International Financial Statistics, September 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF. World Economic Outlook, October 1999.Google Scholar
IMF. World Economic Outlook, October 2000.Google Scholar