Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T21:59:26.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ROUNDTABLE ON TERI L. CARAWAY'S “DE-THAKSINIZING THAILAND: THE LIMITS OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN” – TERI L. CARAWAY RESPONDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary Roundtable
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chambers, Paul. 2005. “Evolving Toward What? Parties, Factions, and Coalition Behavior in Thailand Today.” Journal of East Asian Studies 5 (3): 495520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2004. “Crafting Thailand's New Social Contract.” The Pacific Review 17 (4): 503–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2006. “Party Fabrication: Constitutional Reform and the Rise of Thai Rak Thai.” Journal of East Asian Studies 6 (3): 381407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2007a. “Omitted Variables, Intent and Counterfactuals: A Response to Michael H. Nelson,” Journal of East Asian Studies 7 (1): 149158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael. 2007. “Institutional Incentives and Informal Local Political Groups (Phuak) in Thailand: Comments on Allen Hicken and Paul Chambers. Journal of East Asian Studies 7 (1): 125147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit, and Baker, Chris. 2004. Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Selway, Joel. 2011. “Electoral Reform and Public Policy Outcomes in Thailand: The Politics of the 30-Baht Health Scheme.” World Politics 63 (1): 165202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed