No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ROUNDTABLE ON TERI L. CARAWAY'S “DE-THAKSINIZING THAILAND: THE LIMITS OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN” – TERI L. CARAWAY RESPONDS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Article Commentary Roundtable
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © East Asia Institute 2021
References
REFERENCES
Chambers, Paul. 2005. “Evolving Toward What? Parties, Factions, and Coalition Behavior in Thailand Today.” Journal of East Asian Studies 5 (3): 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2004. “Crafting Thailand's New Social Contract.” The Pacific Review 17 (4): 503–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2006. “Party Fabrication: Constitutional Reform and the Rise of Thai Rak Thai.” Journal of East Asian Studies 6 (3): 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2007a. “Omitted Variables, Intent and Counterfactuals: A Response to Michael H. Nelson,” Journal of East Asian Studies 7 (1): 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael. 2007. “Institutional Incentives and Informal Local Political Groups (Phuak) in Thailand: Comments on Allen Hicken and Paul Chambers. Journal of East Asian Studies 7 (1): 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit, and Baker, Chris. 2004. Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Selway, Joel. 2011. “Electoral Reform and Public Policy Outcomes in Thailand: The Politics of the 30-Baht Health Scheme.” World Politics 63 (1): 165–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed