Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:50:02.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Financial Reform in Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand: When, Why, and How Democracy Matters?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Byung-Kook Kim
Byung-Kook Kim*
Affiliation:
Korea University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the impact of political regime and state bureaucracy on policy responses to the 1997 financial crisis in Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand. The political regime type — classified broadly into democracy and authoritarianism — is found to shape the direction of policy responses by influencing the political elites' understanding on causes, processes, and consequences of the crisis, whereas the state bureaucracy — classified into hybrid and Weberian types — decides the implementation of reform plans by determining the power of big business to resist policy change, as well as the state's organizational capacity to counter that resistance. The article argues that only when the political regime is democratic and the state Weberian will comprehensive — as opposed to partial — reform succeed.

Type
Regional Report
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , February 2002 , pp. 185 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bangkok Post.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bedeski, Robert E. 1994. The Transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstruction in the Sixth Republic under Roh Tae Woo, 1987–1992. Seoul: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berger, Suzanne and Dore, Ronald (eds). 1996. National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongini, Paola, Claessens, Stijn, and Ferri, Giovanni. January 2000. The Political Economy of Distress in East Asian Financial Institutions. World Bank Working Paper No.2265.Google Scholar
Boorman, Jack, Lane, Timothy, Schulze-Ghattas, Marianne, Bulir, Ales, Ghosh, Atish R., Hamann, Javier, Mourmouras, Alexandros, and Phillips, Steven. June 2000. Managing Financial Crises: The Experience in East Asia. IMF Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Drache, Daniel (eds). 1996. State against Markets: The Limits of Globalization. London: Routeledge.Google Scholar
Bunbongkarn, Suchit. 1991. Thailand in 1991. Asian Survey 32(2): 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunbongkarn, Suchit. 1996. State of the Nation: Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Bunbongkarn, Suchit. 1999. Thailands Successful Reforms. Journal of Democracy 10(4): 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunbongkarn, Suchit. 2001. Who Monitors the State? A paper prepared for a conference on “Democratic Consolidation and Transition,” jointly organized by The Gorbachev Foundation of North America and Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior, on October 19–20, 2001, in Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Case, William. 2001. Malaysia's Resilient Pseudodemocracy. Journal of Democracy 12(1): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chosun Ilbo.Google Scholar
Christensen, Scott R. 1993. Democracy without Equity?: The Institutions and Political Consequences of Bangkok-based Development. A paper presented at a conference on “Who Gets What and How?: Challenges for the Future,” organized by TDRI on December 10–11.Google Scholar
Christensen, Scott R. and Siamwalla, Ammar. 1993. Beyond Patronage: Tasks for the Thai State. A paper presented at a conference on “Who Gets What and How?: Challenges for the Future,” organized by TDRI on December 10–11.Google Scholar
Cooper, Donald F. 1995. Thailand: Dictatorship or Democracy? London: Minerva.Google Scholar
Crone, Donald K. 1988. State, Social Elites, and Government Capacity in Southeast Asia. World Politics 15(2): 252–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Collin and Streeck, Wolfgang (ed). 1998. Modern Capitalism or Modern Capitalisms. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Dekle, Robert and Kletzer, Kenneth. May 2001. Domestic Bank Regulation and Financial Crises: Theory and Empirical Evidence from East Asia. IMF Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donga Ilbo.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard F. and Ramsay, Ansil. 1997. Competitive Clientelism and Economic Governance: The Case of Thailand. In Business and the State in Developing Countries, edited by Maxfield, Sylvia and Schneider, Ben Ross. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Emmerson, Donald K. 1999. A Tale of Three Countries. Journal of Democracy 10(4): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gills, Barry K. and Gills, Dong-Sook S. 2000. South Korea and Globalization: The Rise to Globalism? In East Asia and Globalization, edited by Kim, Samuel S. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar
Girling, John. 1981. Thailand: Society and Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, Edmund Terence and Jomo, K.S. 1999. Malaysia's Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 1990. Pathways from the Periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 2000a. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 2000b. The Politics of the Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Democracy 11(2): 130–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. and Kaufman, Robert R. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton-Hart, Natasha. 2000. Thailand and Globalization. In East Asia and Globalization, edited by Kim, Samuel S. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar
Hankyoreh sinmun.Google Scholar
Han'guk Ilbo.Google Scholar
Hayek, , Hayek, F. A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel S. 1998. Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics 50(2): 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1965. Journeys Toward Progress. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, , John, G. Winter 1986. The Irony of State Strength: Comparative Responses to the Oil Shocks in the 1970s. International Organization 40(1): 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. February 2000a. Thailand: Selected Issues. IMF Staff Country Report No.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. February 2000b. Republic of Korea: Economic and Policy Developments. IMF Staff Country Report No.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. October 2000c. Malaysia: Statistical Appendix. IMF Staff Country Report No. 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesudason, James V. 1989. Ethnicity and the Economy: The State, Chinese Business, and Multinationals in Malaysia. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jomo, K. S., et al. 1997. Southeast Asia's Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Policy and Economic Development in Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1987. Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Government-Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. In The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism, edited by Deyo, Frederic C. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Joongang Ilbo.Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. 1994. Bundan'gwa hyokmyongui donghak: hangukgwa mexicoui jeongchi kyongjae (The Dynamics of National Division and Revolution: The Political Economy of Korea and Mexico). Seoul: Munhakgwa jiseongsa.Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. 2000a. The Politics of Crisis and a Crisis of Politics: The Presidency of Kim Dae Jung. In Korea Briefing 1997–1999: Challenges and Change at the Turn of the Century, edited by Oh, Kongdan. New York: M. E. Shape.Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. 2000b. Electoral Politics and Economic Crisis, 1997–1998. In Consolidating Democracy in South Korea, edited by Diamond, Larry and Kim, Byung-Kook. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. Forthcoming. Chaebol Reform, 1981–1997. In Corporate Restructuring in Korea, edited by Haggard, Stephan.Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. and Im, Hyug Baeg. 2001. Crony Capitalism in South Korea, Thailand, and Taiwan: Myth and Reality. Journal of East Asian Studies, 1(1): 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. and Lim, Hyun-Chin. 2000. Labor Against Itself: Structural Dilemmas of State Monism. In Consolidating Democracy in South Korea, edited by Diamond, Larry and Kim, Byung-Kook. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Kim, Dong Hoon. 1999. Han'guk chaebolui jibae gujo (The corporate governance structure of Korean chaebol). In Han'guk chaebol gaehyokron (The theory of chaebol reform), edited by Kim, Dae Hwan and Kim, Kyun. Seoul: Nanam.Google Scholar
Kim, Samuel S. 2000. East Asia and Globalization: Challenges and Responses. In East Asia and Globalization, edited by Kim, Samuel S. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar
Kim, Su Jin. 1996. Minju ihaeng'gi han'guk jeongdang jeongchiui bipanjeok bunseok (A critical analysis on Korean party politics during democratic transition). Uijeong yeongu 2: 16–34.Google Scholar
King, Daniel and LoGerfo, Jim. 1996. Thailand: Toward Democratic Stability. Journal of Democracy 7(1): 102–117.Google Scholar
Klingebiel, Daniela, Kroszner, Randy, Laeven, Luc, and van Oijen, Pieter. March 2001. Stock Market Responses to Bank Restructuring Policies during the East Asian Crisis. World Bank Working Paper No.2571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1998. What happened to Asia? http://www.mit.edu/people/krugman/index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1999. Analytical Afterthoughts on the Asian Crisis. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~pkrugman.Google Scholar
Laeven, Luc. 1999. Risk and Efficiency in East Asian Banks. World Bank Working Paper No.2255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laothamatas, Anek. 1988. Business and Politics in Thailand: New Patterns of Influence. Asian Survey 28 (4): 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laothamatas, Anek. 1992. Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Carl-Johan, Balino, Tomas J. T., Enoch, Charles, Guide, Anne-Marie, Quintyn, Marc, and Teo, Leslie. 1999. Financial Sector Crisis and Restructuring: Lessons from Asia. IMF Occasional Paper 188.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. A. C. 1988. Economic Growth in the ASEAN region: The Political Underpinnings. In Achieving Industrialization in East Asia, edited by Hughes, Helen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maxfield, Sylvia. October 2000. Capital Mobility and Democratic Stability. Journal of Democracy 11(4): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVey, Ruth. 1992. The Materialization of the Southeast Asian Entrepreneurs. In Southeast Asian Capitalists, edited by McVey, Ruth. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Resources. May 1993. Daekyumo group jipdanui upjong jeonmunhwa yudo bangab (A measure to induce sectoral specialization of large business groups). Seoul: Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Resources.Google Scholar
Morell, David and Samudavanija, Chai-Anan. 1981. Political Conflict in Thailand: Reform, Reaction, Revolution. Cambridge: Oelgeschlager Gunn & Main Publishers.Google Scholar
North, Douglas. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Changes, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Overholt, William H. November/December 1999. Thailand's Financial and Political Systems: Crisis and Rejuvenation. Asian Survey 39(6): 1009–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Yung Chul. 1994. Korea: Development and Structural Change of the Financial System. In The Financial Development of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan: Growth, Repression, and Liberalization, edited by Patrick, Hugh T. and Park, Yung Chul. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, Hugh T. 1994. Comparisons, Contrasts, and Implications. In The Financial Development of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan: Growth, Repression, and Liberalization, edited by Patrick, Hugh T. and Yung, Chul Park. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phongpaichit, Pasuk. 1980. The Open Economy and Its Friends: The “Development” of Thailand. Pacific Affairs 53 (3): 440–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phongpaichit, Pasuk. 1992. Technocrats, Businessmen, and Generals: Democracy and Economic Policymaking in Thailand. In The Dynamics of Economic Policy Reform in South-East Asia and South-West Pacific, edited by MacIntyre, Andrew J. and Jayasuriya, Kanishka. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phongpaichit, Pasuk. and Baker, Chris. 1996. Thailand's Boom. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Radelet, Steven and Sachs, Jeffrey. 1998. The East Asian Financial Crisis: Diagnosis, Remedies, Prospects. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, Fred W. 1996. Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. Honolulu: East-West Center, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Samudavanija, Chai-Anan and Chotiya, Parichart. 1998. Beyond Transition in Thailand. In Democracy in East Asia, edited by Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Siamwalla, Ammar. 1997. Can a Developing Democracy Manage Its Macro-economy?: The Case of Thailand. In Thailand's Boom and Bust: Collected Papers, edited by Thailand Development Research Institute. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute.Google Scholar
Suh, Jin-Young and Kim, Byung-Kook. 1999. The Politics of Reform in Korea: Dilemma, Choice, and Crisis. In The World After the Cold War: Issues and Dilemmas, edited by Suh, Jin-Young and Soh, Changrok. Seoul: Graduate School of International Studies, Korea University.Google Scholar
Vongvipanond, Pairoj. 1990. Reform and Privatization of State Enterprises in Thailand. In Privatization and Deregulation in ASEAN and the EC, edited by Pelkmans, Jacques and Wagner, Nobert. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
Welsh, Bridget. 2000. Malaysia and Globalization: Contradictory Currents. In East Asia and Globalization, edited by Kim, Samuel S. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar